Dominakiara

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on (Don't Fear) The Reaper; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Down Under (song).

Blogs are not reliable sources - FlightTime (open channel) 04:34, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at (Don't Fear) The Reaper. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

In the future, please do not ask what is essentially the same question on multiple articles, as it creates a headache for those wishing to respond. Instead, ask on one article and, unless the situation is significantly different on another article, start with the assumption that the answer is the same. - SummerPhD^v2.0 06:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

If the answer is the same for every song on the album, then they should all be listed on the song pages I added sections to because they already are listed for one of the songs on the album. Or do you feel that should be removed?

Dominakiara (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

The answer depends on the individual cover song, per WP:COVERSONG.

If Ninja Sex Party's version is notable independent of the original, it should be in the article. Basically, if the version did not charted on its own and is not the subject of substantial coverage in independent reliable sources about the song, it should not be in the article. - SummerPhD^v2.0 11:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)