Domitius Ulpianus
Joined 29 December 2015
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Domitius Ulpianus in topic Warning
Welcome!
edit
|
Warning
editYou're treading on very thin ice. Consider this your only warning.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: what have I done now??? I only returned the warnings at the article beginning which have been there before. What is really treading on very thin ice is, that at least one user abuses for far more than one year a article about a living person to accuse this living person of commiting crimes, especially (but not only) Perverting the course of justice. The article this user translated is not supported by sources and contains a lot of puffery which was already noted by Baffle gab1978 in January. And in the last few hours it even got worse --Domitius Ulpianus (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have already spent far too much time trying to explain that this project has policies and that you are violating them repeatedly. You came here with a specific agenda, and, generally, editors with agendas are not here to benefit Wikipedia but only to advocate for a particular point of view. I don't care about the advert tag you put on the article. It strikes me as unjustified and in tension with your views on the article, but it's unimportant in the scheme of things. However, I will enforce our policies, and the next time you violate one, I will likely block you.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I'm really sorry for violating any policy. I'm working at German Wikipedia and we obviously have different policies there especially on articles about living persons. I am here with a specific agenda, that's true. This agenda is due to we had exactly the same article in deWP -from where this one was translated- and we removed most of the accusations since they are simply wrong. To prevent possible legal steps by the person treatend in this article, I think it is important, to find a way to a stable neutral text and to get rid of these wrong accusations. Maybe it looks like I was a man on a mission who -I know it from German Wikipedia as well- seldomly has any positiv influence on this whole project. But I can promise you, that we know the autor who translated this article and he is not interested in a neutral view at all and well known for giving fake sources (due to which he has been blocked yesterday and not for the first time). That is what your article is based upon too and I cannot imagine that this adheres your policies?! So please tell me what your policies want me to do in such a case? Would it make e.g. sence to contact wikimedia's legal advisor directly? --Domitius Ulpianus (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- You've made your case at ANI. Thus far, it hasn't grabbed anyone. There's nothing more for you to do here. Go back to de.wiki.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Okay bye, but I have warned you --Domitius Ulpianus (talk) 23:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- You've made your case at ANI. Thus far, it hasn't grabbed anyone. There's nothing more for you to do here. Go back to de.wiki.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: I'm really sorry for violating any policy. I'm working at German Wikipedia and we obviously have different policies there especially on articles about living persons. I am here with a specific agenda, that's true. This agenda is due to we had exactly the same article in deWP -from where this one was translated- and we removed most of the accusations since they are simply wrong. To prevent possible legal steps by the person treatend in this article, I think it is important, to find a way to a stable neutral text and to get rid of these wrong accusations. Maybe it looks like I was a man on a mission who -I know it from German Wikipedia as well- seldomly has any positiv influence on this whole project. But I can promise you, that we know the autor who translated this article and he is not interested in a neutral view at all and well known for giving fake sources (due to which he has been blocked yesterday and not for the first time). That is what your article is based upon too and I cannot imagine that this adheres your policies?! So please tell me what your policies want me to do in such a case? Would it make e.g. sence to contact wikimedia's legal advisor directly? --Domitius Ulpianus (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have already spent far too much time trying to explain that this project has policies and that you are violating them repeatedly. You came here with a specific agenda, and, generally, editors with agendas are not here to benefit Wikipedia but only to advocate for a particular point of view. I don't care about the advert tag you put on the article. It strikes me as unjustified and in tension with your views on the article, but it's unimportant in the scheme of things. However, I will enforce our policies, and the next time you violate one, I will likely block you.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)