Donaldmacangus

Donaldmacangus, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Donaldmacangus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the info

Thanks GermanJoe for the information, I was mainly trying to correct various errors regarding ownership. I searched in google for Pivotal CRM and noticed some outdated information in Wikipedia so thought I'd try to fix it :). I do work for the new owning company but did not realise that would be an issue - who can correct these errors if not me? - Thanks!

--Donaldmacangus (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Donaldmacangus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Pivotal CRM, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Removed as requested - will try to come up with another description for this event

--Donaldmacangus (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Avolin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Avolin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/10/30/1639375/0/en/ESW-Capital-Acquires-Aptean-Vertical-Business-Applications-Group.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Csgir (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi - I'm not getting paid to make these edits however I do work for Avolin and I also use Wikipedia a lot, I saw lots of errors and thought cleaning up the mistakes regarding who owns different product lines etc would be a good thing to do - obviously not :). I've now read the epic info who can do what and why but surely if I see an error and can correct it quickly that's a good idea? - I fully understand that we should not use Wikipedia for marketing etc but I really was just trying to add some factual information. I've also added the disclosure info as requested - anyway I'll try to restrict my editing in future - thanks --Donaldmacangus (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I would advise that you instead request changes on the article talk pages. You can use the {{request edit}} tempate to attract the attention of other uninvolved editors to help you with your changes. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Disclosure of employment

Hello Donaldmacangus. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Avolin, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Donaldmacangus. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Donaldmacangus|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)