The Focus Group

edit

The article was deleted because it didn't assert notability. All the article said was that it's a musical project, with no indication that it's a well known and/or important musical project. -- Steel 11:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion. Articles #7 applied to your article. -- Steel 14:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
It is not required that I see if there are objections before I delete the article. And the speedy keep guideline has absolutely nothing to do with this in the slightest. There was absulutely no assertion of notability in that article. If you can provide one, I'll undelete it and send it through WP:AFD instead. -- Steel 14:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I've restored the article, feel free to add the information you just told me to assert it's notability. I'll be around later this evening to put it up on articles for deletion. -- Steel 15:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Because it's still not notable. Just not not-notable enough to speedy delete. -- Steel 16:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ghost Box reads like an advert and has to go. Hauntology may be vaguely notable, but you'll have to make your case on the AfD, because I'm unconvinced it's worth keeping. -- Steel 18:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can I ask how ghost box reads like an advert? Im not associated with the label in any way.
Well it's not that much like an advert, but phrases like "The small number of artists may be explained by the label's determination to stick closely to its original sound and philosophy. Knowledge of the label and its music is growing" and "Ghost Box's artists are often thought of as pioneers of the Hauntology musical genre." don't do it any favours. -- Steel 19:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Could you clarify on the Afd that you're User:81.154.130.6 to avoid confusion? And sign your posts with "~~~~", again, to make it easier for others to follow the discussion. Thanks. -- Steel 19:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let's let the AfD run it's course. -- Steel 19:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
After a few days (usually around 5) an administrator will turn up and decide whether the community (those who participated on the Afd) think the articles should be kept or deleted. It's not a vote, so even if you end up in the minority it's still possible for it to end the way you want it. -- Steel 20:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ourob.gif)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ourob.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Advisorycircle.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Advisorycircle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Farmersangle.gif)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Farmersangle.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Letloose.gif)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Letloose.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Owlsmap1.jpg)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Owlsmap1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Advisorycircle1.gif)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Advisorycircle1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Releeshan2.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Releeshan2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Giantrobot.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Giantrobot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Friendswith.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Friendswith.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Octocharacter.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Octocharacter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:34, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Bigfootvinyl.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bigfootvinyl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ibn (talk) 11:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC).Reply

File:Joevegetables.JPG listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joevegetables.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Doctor Who Ghostlight synopsis size

edit
 
Hello, Dr zoidberg590. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hypothermia

edit

Hi. I've added a citation needed tag to the statement you added to Hypothermia in this edit. It would be nice if you can add a source to support it. I also fixed the link that you added to the disambiguation page elastic (wikt:elasticated is the proper target here). I see that you were notified about this link by the DPL bot. Can I ask why you removed that notification from your talk page without actually fixing the link? Lennart97 (talk) 21:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply