November 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Paul Erik (talk) 03:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Paul Erik (talk) 03:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Daniel Resendiz

edit

A tag has been placed on Daniel Resendiz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DAJF (talk) 04:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Daniel Resendiz

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Daniel Resendiz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ARendedWinter 05:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

(moved material from a soon to be speedied page called Daniel Resendiz why do my sites keep being delleted?

You're not allowed to make a page about yourself unless you are someone famous. This page called Daniel Resendiz will be deleted very soon. I have moved the content to the only place in the encyclopedia where it is allowed to be, called User:Dresendiz. You need to be more careful about following the rules around here and not make childish edits like the one you made to Daniel, which I have changed back. Accounting4Taste:talk 04:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Daniel_Resendiz"

I've now gone through and fixed all the garbage you added to articles. Consider this your very last warning; one more piece of vandalism, and I'll block you forever. No more chances. Accounting4Taste:talk 05:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Daniel resendiz

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Daniel resendiz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Merenta (talk) 22:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I've blocked you for 48 hours so you can think about whether you want to add to Wikipedia or vandalize it. If you come back and do things against the rules, the block will become permanent. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply