Drunkenpeter99

I would like to start fresh with my talk page.

I apologize to Wikipedia for disrespecting its policy and would like to start over with everybody signed on. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Jerry Goldsmith

Hey, thanks for adding an AFI section on the Jerry Goldsmith article. I've been meaning to give that whole article a massive overhaul soon, but haven't got around to it yet. I've seen stubs with more sources, too. - jg2904 ^(Talk) 15:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. I figured it was necessary since he was one of the great composers of film. -Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, the overhaul of the Jerry Goldsmith article is virtually complete. What do you think? Jg2904 ^(Talk) 15:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I think it's best to merge it with the "Oscars" section. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Nino Rota

Hi Drunkenpeter99 - I noticed that you added some awards to Nino Rota. Looks good. I also have been working on Rota recently - especially the Nino Rota discography. I think that it might be appropriate (for one of us) to add an Awards and nominations section to Nino Rota. He got a lot of them! This is often done. E.g., see Audrey Hepburn or Danny Elfman. Many of Rota's awards can be found here at IMDb. There are even more awards if you look in Europe. What do you think of this idea? You can respond here (or on my talk page if you wish). Thank you for your time.--Foobarnix (talk) 21:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I think that can be arranged. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 22:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

File:AMERICAN-DAD-Hurricane-Season-6-Episode-17-550x309.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AMERICAN-DAD-Hurricane-Season-6-Episode-17-550x309.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pushing Daisies (Original Television Soundtrack).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pushing Daisies (Original Television Soundtrack).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 07:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't recall uploading that image. Or maybe I did and just forgot about it. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Nielsen ratings

Hi Dp,

Thanks for your recent contributions to Nielsen ratings. You recently added total viewership data (in millions) for the top-rated shows. Can you please provide a source for this data? None of the four sources listed in that section cite those numbers, so you must provide a citation. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 21:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 7 x 13 = 28

The article 7 x 13 = 28 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about comedy routine with no significant claim to Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 18:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Go ahead, delete it. It was a bad idea anyway. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 01:43, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Carrie (1976 film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry. I was just adding the AFI nominations for Carrie. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Right, but you need to cite where you're getting the information from. I'd recommend a source other than IMDb; perhaps there's a website for AFI that mentions the nominations? Doniago (talk) 14:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Actually, there is. They have downloads of all the nominees for their lists on their website.

We need reliable sources for our edits

Forums are not reliable sources for information such as the TV Guide 2004 list you've been adding to articles. Just look up the relevant issue of the magazine at a library and cite that! --Orange Mike | Talk 14:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Alright, there is a library of TV Guide magazines. I'll just use that as a reference.

American Broadcasting Company

Hi Drunkenpeter - when adding information about ABC's recent primetime special, please use [[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]], as ABC links to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 02:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories

Hello, I think you should stop creating all these categories for TV awards. They're beyond over-categorization, and will all probably be deleted. Some of them are already up for deletion, so it'd be nice if you'd stop creating them, because you're probably wasting your time creating and adding them, and then them having to be nominated for deletion and then removed. Thanks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 01:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Very well. Go ahead and delete them all. I didn't have to do this anyway.--Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 01:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TV Guide's 50 Greatest TV Stars of All Time

The article TV Guide's 50 Greatest TV Stars of All Time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIR - the specific list, in itself, does not seem notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ►  14:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Do what you want. I was just trying to post every TV Guide list I could find. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Star Trek (film). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TV Guide's 25 Greatest Sci-Fi Legends

The article TV Guide's 25 Greatest Sci-Fi Legends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subjective one-off list of no historical significance without any coverage in third-party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 19:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Do what you want. I already know the best science fiction shows are Star Trek, The Twilight Zone and The X-Files. --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

TV Guide lists

Stop posting all these TV guide lists on Wikipedia, they are considered a copyright violation, see this to explain why. Thanks Secret ^account 04:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Oh, alright, fine. I was just exploring other lists of theirs.--Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 04:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Please help me

The URL http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/20/pixar-announces-two-new-films_n_932198.html?ir=Entertainment reveals new titles of Pixar films. I added the titles successfully, but I cannot add this URL as a reference. Can you do it?? Georgia guy (talk) 20:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Sure, I'd be glad to. Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 20:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Honeymooner Saturdays

I think you'll find all the CBS episodes originally aired on Saturdays — I think it was the only night Gleason ever ran on CBS.  :) — HarringtonSmith (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. ;) --Drunkenpeter99 (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films considered the best for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lost Season 4 Soundtrack.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lost Season 4 Soundtrack.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)