User talk:Duckmather/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Duckmather. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Welcome Duckmather!
I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Sm8900 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ankita Shorey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JMC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Tag bombing at Maharaja Ranjit Singh Armed Forces Preparatory Institute
Hi! I don't know if you know this, but tagbombing (adding lots of cleanup tags, both at the top and inline) is generally not very liked or useful. If it pervades in the entire article, usually only notices at the top or in a specific section are necessary. I hope this helped! :) Sennecaster (What now?) 01:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback! I'll use more of the top cleanup tags from now on. (FYI, I am fairly conservative about what kind of stuff here needs cleanup, which is why I tend to insert more cleanup tags wherever I go.) Duckmather (talk) 20:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devraj Sanyal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Duckmather! Your additions to SS City of Johannesburg have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the copyright notice, Diannaa! I'll be much more careful about using copyrighted content in the future. Duckmather (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DarkSide (hacking group), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Ukrainian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- It's fixed.Duckmather (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Machine learning in bioinformatics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dropout.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Duckmather (talk) 18:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
Hello, I'm David Gerard. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. None of crypto sites, crypto site reprints, promotional sites, personal blogs, or Forbes contributor blogs are Reliable Sources for Wikipedia - David Gerard (talk) 09:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Bad referencing in books
A book cannot be a reference in an article about itself. References must be about the subject, and except in very rare cases a book is not about itself. Please stop adding references to books in articles about those same books.
Additionally, you have been repeatedly violating WP:CITEVAR, which says not to change the established style of referencing in an article. In an article that uses Citation Style 2 (the {{citation}} template), you should not be using Citation Style 1 (the {{cite}} line of templates). And in an article using list-defined referencing (all references named at the end of the article inside the {{reflist}} template, sometimes used in conjunction with the {{r}} template to refer to later named templates) you should not be placing the references inline, in the text of the article. You have been repeatedly doing this despite my previous notifications in edit messages that you should stop. Do you want me to start mass-rollbacking your edits? Pay attention and do better. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- In addition, your edits at Combinatorial Geometry in the Plane show that you did not even make the most cursory attempt to look at the sources that were already present in the article. If you had looked at them, you would have noticed that the supposed 1950 publication date was a typo, instead of tagging it as contradictory and yet propagating the same information into the infobox you created, without checking it for correctness. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Startups in Odisha moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Startups in Odisha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. nearlyevil665 19:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Startups in Kerala moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Startups in Kerala, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. nearlyevil665 19:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Startups in Madhya Pradesh moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Startups in Madhya Pradesh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. nearlyevil665 19:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Bihar Startup Policy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bihar Startup Policy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihar Startup Policy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Steiner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Duckmather (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Ideamarket moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ideamarket, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ideamarket has a new comment
- (I know you only split the article, and did your due diligence by tagging it appropriately, so thank you for that! I'll leave this here anyways, but wanted to make note of this.) ASUKITE 00:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Coinvise
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Coinvise, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rally (cryptocurrency)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rally (cryptocurrency), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Roll (cryptocurrency)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Roll (cryptocurrency), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 06:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Calaxy
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Calaxy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Acacacacczc (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fyooz
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fyooz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Acacacacczc (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Cryptocurrency/blockchain standard notice
 | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Series expansion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Function.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Duckmather (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Signpost interview request - Random Page Patrol
Hello! I'm writing an article for The Signpost about the Random Page Patrol wikiproject. We often do interviews with Wikiproject members, and I saw your name on the list of members. As a newer member, I'd love to ask about the project, why you do it, and why you think it's valuable. I could drop a few questions for you below which you could answer in your own time over the next couple of weeks. Let me know - thank you! Ganesha811 (talk) 19:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the request! It'd be great for you to ask me some questions about this. (I'm somewhat new to the entire enterprise of writing an encyclopedia anyways ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.)
- As for the questions you've already asked: I participate in the project because I find it a great way to find stuff to write about. (As you may have already noticed, I *do* have a marked interest in mathematics and computer science, but I often find it edifying to write about other topics.) Also, I think that the project is valuable because it brings attention to articles that lack it. Duckmather (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
see User:Abraham236
User:Abraham236 contains {{User shared IP address|Duckmather}}. If true I think you should add that template to your user page. -- PBS (talk) 23:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification! The template you're asking about was already there on my userpage under the formerly autocollapsed "WP-relevant" userboxbox. (I just edited the page so that none of the userboxboxes autocollapsed, so all the userboxes are now visible.) Duckmather (talk) 04:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I hope you are entering this! Anything you've done or do in November on leads can be entered. Small cash prizes. Johnbod (talk) 02:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Done! I've entered what I've done so far. (I'll likely won't be able to accept prizes because of it beyond my means, but I'll join for the fun anyways ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) Duckmather (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fairfield Independent School District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfield County.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. Duckmather (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Startups in Odisha
Hello, Duckmather. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Startups in Odisha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Startups in Kerala
Hello, Duckmather. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Startups in Kerala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Startups in Madhya Pradesh
Hello, Duckmather. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Startups in Madhya Pradesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
List of Hindawi journals
These tags are ridiculous. Just because a journal is defunct, does not make it cease to be verifiable, e.g. Advances in Acoustics and Vibration. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ideamarket
Hello, Duckmather. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ideamarket, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)