Dwain

Please note: Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please create an account or log in if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion.

Welcome!

Peace in Christ!

Alessio Tramello

Hi! This article was tagged for notability and it caught my interest. As you would know, the guy was famous in his time and now becuse of his body of work. I added a bit of stuff and removed the tag but the article deserves some work. Someone who reads Italian could do a service on this one. I'm watching it with interest. Cheers! Stormbay 18:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Francis Matthews

That was a good catch that they are one in the same Francis Matthews. I googled it to double check, and you are right. Well done! --Briancua 23:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Carl A. Anderson

Hi Dwain. I note that you created Carl A. Anderson. Do you have any connection to the organisation? --WikiCats 14:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

If your are a good catholic man over 18 you would be eligible to be nominated.[1] If you have any interest in this organisation please email me. --WikiCats 22:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Many are called, few are chosen. Pray about it. Email me.--WikiCats 00:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Jimmy Fallon

I've reverted the article to what I believe is the better photograph. Thanks for coming to me for help, and please let me know if there are any further issues with this. - Brian Kendig 18:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Our Sun day Visitor

The stub you wrote about this has been marked for speedy. There are people looking through the edits and foolishly deleting all stubs as not showing notability. I removed the tag as absurd, but it will surely be marked for deletion in a few hours or days unless you greatly expand it. There is quite a lot to say, as I am sure you know. -- Wish I had time to help more personally.DGG 00:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Pro-Life Celebrities

Dwain, I thought you might like this list as it is going to be deleted!

This is a list of noted, or famous people that are against abortion and are of the Pro-Life ethic.

• George Allen
• Carl A. Anderson
• Maya Angelou
• Francis Cardinal Arinze
• Chuck Baldwin
• Gary Bauer
• Carlos Felipe Ximenes Belo
• Pope Benedict XVI
• Daniel Berrigan
• Philip Berrigan
• Matt Blunt
• Pat Boone
• Tom Brinkman
• Sam Brownback
• Pat Buchanan
• George H. W. Bush
• George W. Bush
• Jeb Bush
• Brett Butler
• Nick Cannon
• George Carey
• Robert P. Casey
• Robert Patrick Casey, Jr.
• Anthony Castrogiovanni
• James Caviezel
• Dick Cheney
• Tom Coburn
• Margaret Colin
• Pete Coors
• Michael Coren
• Mairead Corrigan
• Ann Coulter
• Mike Crapo
• Randy "Duke" Cunningham
• Robert Davi
• Stockwell Day
• Tom DeLay
• Jim DeMint
• Elizabeth Dole
• Jerry Doyle
• Matt Drudge
• Mia Farrow
• Mike Fitzpatrick
• Raymond Flynn
• Steve Forbes
• Ezola B. Foster
• Cheryl Gallant
• Andy Garcia
• Noelia Garcia
• Lakita Garth
• Mel Gibson
• Billy Graham
• Lindsey Graham
• Ron Gray
• A.C. Green
• Ryan Gosling
• Gustavo Gutiérrez
• Sean Hannity
• Katherine Harris
• Elisabeth Hasselbeck
• Orrin Hatch
• J. D. Hayworth
• Patricia Heaton
• Nat Hentoff
• Charlton Heston
• Jim Holt
• Mike Huckabee
• Cláudio Cardinal Hummes
• Laura Ingraham
• Jim Inhofe
• Kathy Ireland
• Johnny Isakson
• Jesse Jackson
• Pope John Paul II
• Bill Jones
• Jack Kemp
• Alan Keyes
• Al King
• Nick Lachey
• Rush Limbaugh
• Ronald A. Lisy
• Michelle Malkin
• Maya J. Marcel-Keyes
• Mel Martinez
• John McCain
• Norma McCorvey
• Tim Michels
• Jeff Miller
• Zell Miller
• Kate Mulgrew
• Marilyn Musgrave
• Bernard Nathanson
• Jack Nicholson
• Chuck Norris
• Kevin O'Brien
• Pat O'Brien
• Patrick O'Malley
• Jennifer O'Neill
• Dolores O'Riordan
• James D. Oberweis
• Joe Ortega
• Frank Pavone
• Adolfo Pérez Esquivel
• Michael Peroutka
• Rick Perry
• Howard Phillips
• Glenn Poshard
• Dan Quayle
• Michael Reagan
• Ronald Reagan
• William Rehnquist
• Pat Robertson
• Tim Roemer
• Frère Roger
• Rick Santorum
• Michael Savage
• Dana Rosemary Scallon
• Phyllis Schlafly
• Laura Schlessinger
• Jean Schmidt
• Marvin Scott
• Martin Sheen
• Brooke Shields
• Nick Smith
• Gerry St. Germain
• Rebecca St. James
• Scott Stapp
• Michael Steele
• Ben Stein
• Paul Szabo

• Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama
• Mother Teresa
• Clarence Thomas
• Jonathan Taylor Thomas
• Tommy Thompson

• Maurice Vellacott

• Lech Wałęsa
• Tom Wappel
• J.C. Watts
• Elsie Wayne
• Rowan Williams

• Loretta Young

• Franco Zeffirelli

Barnaby Cabe

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Barnaby Cabe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. •Jim62sch• 17:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

I've requested page protection at WP:RPP, hope it clears things up. (although you say you're a conservative...hey, anti-vandalism unites people!) —Ignatzmice^talk_contribs 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Why would people find your profile offensive?

I may feel it shows a certain credulity (especially in detecting any trace of leadership, honesty, morality, etc. in George W. "whited sepulchre" Bush); but there is nothing which any sane person in a democratic republic should find offensive. I hope the vandals tire of you and go bother somebody else; I haven't been harassed for days now! --Orange Mike 23:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC) (took some of that reactionary Ben Stein's money once)

Is this Pitchka who started a page on Jose Lopez-Gaston?

I would like to talk to whoever started that article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.163.185 (talk) 04:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Solomon P. Sharp

I hope to further expand this article, as well as Jereboam O. Beauchamp in the coming weeks. If all goes well, I might even create a new article for the Beauchamp-Sharp Tragedy and try to make a featured topic out of all three together. If you're interested in helping, feel free.

BTW, your user page gets some serious vandalism, huh? Amazing. Believe it or not, there are some other conservative Wikipedians! Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 21:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

That's interesting about Noah Beauchamp. If you can cite a source, you could mention the connection between the two in their respective articles. As for how to help on these articles, I usually start by adding any reliable sources I can find to the Further Reading section of each article, then start expanding the article from them, starting with the shortest source and going to the longest one. I'm almost finished expanding Solomon P. Sharp from the Cooke article; next I'll try to get my hands on a copy of the Bruce article and extract pertinent information about Sharp from it. Sharp's article will probably be ready for a GA nom by then. My cardinal rule is to cite everything as it's added; often when you're done, you end up with at least a GA-quality article. Only problem is no images of Beauchamp or Anna Cooke. If you run across any, please upload them. Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 18:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ouija Board Criticism

The article Ouija Board Criticism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A separate page solely for criticisms of something inherently fails WP:NPOV

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Ouija Board Criticism for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Ouija Board Criticism, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ouija Board Criticism until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Ouija Board Criticism

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ouija Board Criticism, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.hauntedamericatours.com/ghosts/OuijaBoard.php, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ouija Board Criticism and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Ouija Board Criticism, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ouija Board Criticism with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ouija Board Criticism. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ouija Board Criticism saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! LuckyLouie (talk) 03:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Edmund C. Gruss

I regret that my knowledge is very limited. My comments may even have gone beyond what I know. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Antonacci

The article Mark Antonacci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A lawyer who wrote a book on the Shroud of Turin called The Resurrection of the Shroud, published in 2000 by M.Evans & Company. No indication this person meets the requirements of WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page

User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AniMate 09:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oreste Migliaccio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oreste Migliaccio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheGGoose (talk) 03:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dwain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dwain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dwain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dwain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Hey Dwain! I like your edits to bad so many have been deleted by Trolls! My own User page was designated an attack page by a troll and speedily deleted! Isn't that nice? Following your User page I am taking after you! Instead of lucifer I chose satan to suck! Won't be surprised if that user page is also deleted! LOL. Friuli (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracy Marie Fiorenza (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AviationFreak was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracy Marie Fiorenza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak💬 20:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

You do realize that there is a huge article on another person Craig DeLeeuw Robertson that should also fall under the non-notable category, but, for some reason Wikipedites approved the initial article. When it was pointed out that he didn't seem to be notable suddenly the article became The Killing of Craig DeLeeuw Robertson, as if that makes him more notable. Sadly, I think there are other reasons that Robertson is being written about so vociferously here but an article about Fiorenza is prevented from even being started. Dwain (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Dwain! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AviationFreak💬 20:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tracy Marie Fiorenza

Hello, Dwain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tracy Marie Fiorenza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tracy Marie Fiorenza

Hello, Dwain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tracy Marie Fiorenza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)