User talk:ENT100

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello ENT100, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! Lone Wolf ^howl 08:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. It is very much appreciated. ENT100 (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eumelanin Human Skin Colour Scale (July 27)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Eumelanin Human Skin Colour Scale to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing this draft. I note your feedback about the article appearing to contain text generated by a large language model.

Ahead of me revising this draft, i would appreciate specific clarification on which aspects of the draft that led you to this decision. Could you please indicate which passages, wording patterns, or other features raised this concern?

The draft was prepared from independent published sources, and all references were checked against the statements made. I would like to understand the basis for the assessment so that I can address any specific issues appropriately in the revised version.

Thank you for your guidance. ENT100 (talk) 12:37, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

I have still not had a response to my question. To correct the record, i wrote the draft myself and as i have declared i am involved in the development of this scale. If you flagged this as AI written because it was very well written, then it is because i am a senior physician and scientist who knows this work intimately. This is why i declared this conflict of interest, and i also stated i am happy for editors to edit the work. Did you check the inline citations before declining as AI generated? I joined Wikepedia because i wanted to contribute to this encyclopedia, and i realised that the discussions on Human Skin Colour Scales on Wikepedia was not complete, hence writing this draft on the EHSCS. ENT100 (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ENT100! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Hello, I'm B.J. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nana Kwaku Boateng seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ‎ — B.J (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

The current version about Nana Kwaku Boateng I appears to conflate two different historical figures. The cited source discussing the 1874–75 Dwaben/Juaben revolt identifies Asafo Agyei (Asafo Adjei), who assumed the Dwaben/Juaben stool after the death of Sapomaa, as the leader of the rebellion. It does not identify Nana Kwaku Boateng I, whose reign as Omanhene of New Juaben began in 1913. I have access to several peer-reviewed publications from the Historical Society of Ghana documenting the genealogy and succession, and I intend to update the article with inline citations. I started with the introduction and cited one of the published journals. Could editors please review the sources before reverting further changes? It is important that the correct history is put on Wikepedia and before deleting it is important to verify citatons. I shall be editing this article again. ENT100 (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eumelanin Human Skin Colour Scale has been accepted

Eumelanin Human Skin Colour Scale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Medievalfran (talk) 10:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. This is great news. I will continue working hard on behalf of Wikipedia, so i am grateful for the next steps you have provided. ENT100 (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2026 (UTC)