Eaglegrafix
Rest Stop on US 69 in East Texas
Primary interest is in articles on Texas, Texas events, Texas history and Texans.
What Makes a Person Notable?
editAfter deleting the listing of Hardy Parkerson from the listing of Longview's "Notable People" and giving my reasons, the name was re-listed. To be fair, if Mr. Parkerson believes himself or if some one who knows him believes him to be a person who has notoriety because of his connection in Longview, I am willing to let the reader decide. I do not dispute that Mr. Parkerson is notable for various reasons. He is known for his poetic ditty's and short rhyming verses. He is also known very well in Louisiana as an attorney where he practiced for some 40 years. He has supporters and admirers who may well consider him "famous" as well as detractors who consider him "infamous". He did not go quietly into the night when he resigned the Louisiana bar and retired from the practice of law.
However, since Mr. Parkerson has lived and worked in Lake Charles, Louisiana since before he graduated from high school; and since he has not done anything significant or notable in his life that has been connected to his early years in Longview; and, since he is not recognized or known by any but a very few people in Longview, it is therefore fair to question his listing as a notable person from Longview. Unlike others "Notable People" listed in the Longview Texas article, very few references can be found regarding Mr. Parkerson's Longview roots. (this contributor found only one on the Internet after extensive search). In fact, it is Lake Charles that is referenced as Mr. Parkerson's home. By comparison, in the other's listings their place of birth as Longview Texas is mentioned in almost every reference of their name.
Mr. Parkerson was born in Longview. He lived in White Oak (not Longview) until he was 12, (according to records found on the internet). He moved to Nacogdoches, Texas and at some time moved again to Lake Charles, Louisiana where he graduated from high school. Since then there is little if any record of his interaction with "his home town." As I said before, he needs to be satisfied to be a notable person from Lake Charles and Louisiana.
Therefore, if he is to be listed, and because he is not well known, some background needs to be given so that the reader will have a better understanding of Mr. Parkerson's connection to Longview. A short bio and the circumstances which led to his resignation and all should be made available to those who read his name in the list. Otherwise he should be satisfied with his legacy in Louisiana, for he has none of note here. Eagle (talk) 05:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Which Railroad Company brought the railroad to Longview?
editLongview Texas was founded during the time when railroad companies were laying new track and establishing lines between points of commerce. Many times this activity created a point of commerce as was the case with Longview.
There is confusion over what railroad actually bought the firs 100 acres on which the original town of Longview was platted. Historical records differ between the Southern Pacific Railroad Company (no connection the the SP in existence today) and the Texas and Pacific Railroad. This confusion comes from the fact that both companies were front and center during the first 2 years of Longview's history.
On April 7, 1870,O.H. Methvin sold 100 acres to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a state chartered company that had a line from Waskom, Texas to Marshall Texas. It is the Southern Pacific Railroad Company that laid out the town of Longview which led to its incorporation. At the same time, the federally chartered Texas Pacific Railroad Company. This charter was granted on March 3, 1871 almost 11 months after the sale of the 100 acres.
On March 21, 1872 the Texas Pacific Railroad acquired the Longview-Waskom rail line. The Texas Pacific Railroad Company had been granted permission to build a transcontinental railroad from Marshall, Texas to San Diego, California. On May 2, 1872, the named was changed to Texas and Pacific Railroad Company. T&PL then constructed the Longview-Dallas section putting it into service on July 1, 1873 and the Marshall-Texarkana section on December 28, 1873.
It was the Southern Pacific Railroad Company that received the 100 acres from O.H. Methvin for one gold dollar and brought the railroad to Longview. It was the Texas and Pacific Railroad Company that bought the Southern Pacific Railroad Company with the permission of the state of Texas. It was T&PL that carried on the work westward. The source of this historic record is the Handbook of Texas Online, a project of the Texas State Historical Association and the book Traditions of the Land: The History of Gregg County (Longview, Texas: Gregg County Historical Foundation, 1989) Eagle (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
The Real is Way More than Living
editFor the lack of a better term, "moto" will be used to refer to Longview's tag line which proclaims the Brand Promise recently researched and adopted by the City of Longview, Longview Partnership, Longview Convention and Visitors Bureau and Longview Economic Development Corporation. The Brand Promise to visitors, newcomers, businesses considering Longview is that in Longview one can enjoy a true East Texas experience. Longview delivers all that is good about the East Texas Region, its people, culture and customs. Yes, those seeking to move here will find Real East Texas living. In the same way those not looking to live but only to visit and experience, will find Real East Texas friendly, fun, sports, recreation, relaxation, business, excitement, festivals....etc...etc. The "moto" is not limited to Real East Texas living but expands to include all that is good in East Texas and all that makes Real East Texans in Longview proud of our city's many benefits.
Speedy deletion of Image:BrandLogoRealEastTexas.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on Image:BrandLogoRealEastTexas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:BrandLogoRealEastTexas.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q T C 03:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
editYour upload of File:AlleyFest LongviewTX.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:BalloonGlowTexasBalloon.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:BalloonsInflating.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Bill Bussey in his hot-air balloon Skydancer.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:BUSSY-ALDRICH-PHOTO.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Eaglegrafix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The file File:GTBR042.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:GTBR041.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
The file File:CITY053web.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
