Ebelular

Hello there. If you have a quesstion to ask, just type it here and I'll try to answer it. :) ____Ebelular 11:22, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi. Please remember to write in full sentences. See the Wikipedia:Manual of Style for more tips. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:40, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

welcome!

Hi there, Ebelular. First, let me just say welcome to Wikipedia. I see that no-one else has welcomed you, so let me just give you a few handy links in case you haven't already discovered themQ

• The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good easy-to-follow guide to editing Wikipedia.
• Welcome is another good place to start.
• Wikipedia:How does one edit a page gives editing help.
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style gives formatting info.
• Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now.
• Wikipedia:Help covers a broad range of useful topics.
• Wikipedia:Help desk is a good place to ask questions.
• Wikipedia:Show preview explains how to double-check your edits before saving.

You should also feel free to drop me a question on my talk page.

Secondly, if you haven't already discovered it, the Irish wikipedians' notice board is a handy discussion area, in case you hadn't found it already.

Thirdly, you said in the CTYI article that it is commonly reffered to as 'nerd camp' by its students. I attended CTYI numerous times and never once heard that term used. What is your source for that?

Happy editing, JOHN COLLISON [ Ludraman] 15:57, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. I didn't know there was an Irish wikipedia notice board, I'll be sure to check it out. As for the CTYI/nerdcamp thing, I never went to CTYI, but I know a couple of people who went there. I, like them are in college now, so I don't know how recent that phrase is, or even if it's jsut a bit of a piss take. :) I should ask them again I suppose... I was just browsing around and 'was bold' :). ____Ebelular 20:49, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Copy and paste

Please do not copy and paste as a way to move an article. For a move to take place in which a page already exists it needs to be done by an admin. K1Bond007 18:08, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

All right, I was trying to move it, but couldn't, so I though I'd copy and paste. Ebelular 18:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

boards.ie

Saw you on boards... just thought I'd say hello! -- Lochaber 10:59, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Hello there. Might see you around. Ebelular 12:55, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006

Hi, this is a circular to Wikipedians in Ireland to draw your attention to Wikimedia UK, where the establishment of a local Wikimedia chapter for the United Kingdom (and possibly for the Republic of Ireland) is being discussed. See the talk page, as well as the mailing list; a meetup will take place to discuss matters in London in September, for anyone who can get there. On another topic, plans are being drawn up for a UK bid for Wikimania 2006, which would be conveniently close to Ireland. On the other hand, Dublin's bid was one of the final three last year - might we bid again? --Kwekubo 03:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

A user is trying to have the Template:Irish Republic infobox deleted. Your comments would be welcome. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 22:07, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Camara

Hello, I don't think I've met you before, I'm a 15 year old secondary school student, and I've only been with Camara for a few months now. Sorry this message is really late, I don't log in much myself. Thanks, Thesamc 22:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mighty munch packet.jpg

An image you uploaded (Image:Mighty munch packet.jpg) was tagged as "PD-self". While I do not doubt that you took this picture, simply taking a picture of a copyrighted image does not give you jurisdication over the copyright statu of that image. You do not have the authority to release an image that is, in essence, a copy of a copyrighted image into the public domain. I have tagged the image with {{no license}}; feel free to relicense it under fair use if you wish. This is merely information for the future. —Cuiviénen 05:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Metroid Prime (creature)

Metroid Prime (creature), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Metroid Prime (creature) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metroid Prime (creature) (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Metroid Prime (creature) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tallon

I have nominated Tallon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. – i123Pie _bio^contribs 14:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2009 has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. → Dylan620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 17:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Employment Act 1980

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Employment Act 1980, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Employment Act 1982. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pantibar

A tag has been placed on Pantibar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RP459 (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DublinBikes

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on DublinBikes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TParis00ap (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Irish budget, 2010

On December 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Irish budget, 2010, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Irish Taxi Council

A tag has been placed on Irish Taxi Council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. gaidheal1 ^{(talk♫contribs)} 15:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of TOG (hackerspace) for deletion

The article TOG (hackerspace) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOG (hackerspace) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 08:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Irish budget, 2010 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irish budget, 2010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish budget, 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind _talk 17:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi Ebelular,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Migrant X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HSE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss D, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Justin Barrett page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ebelular. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ebelular. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Justin Barrett page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Fetal Heartbeat Bill

Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to Fetal Heartbeat Bill adding "United States of America" to every section. Since the scope of the article, as you well pointed out, is a single country, it's much more straightforward to mention this once in the introduction. Adding the name of the country to all sections, as if this were a multi-country article, looks very clunky. If information about other countries' bills is introduced to the article at a later time, the scope and structure should of course be revisited.

If you disagree with any of the above, I'm happy to discuss it in order to reach a satisfactory state for the article. Mechordeus (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I was hoping that by putting the country specific sections it would encourage editors to add details from other countries, and hence make the article more global. However that hasn't happened. Maybe I was too optimisitic? :) ___Ebelular (talk) 08:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

That's a very good sentiment, but sadly I think it usually works out better to rely on information being there before adding too much 'scaffolding'. Thank you for the effort and subsequent edits, regardless! Looks like the article is getting a lot of attention recently, so hopefully it improves further :D Mechordeus (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Article for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irish slaves myth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish slaves myth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Reviewed!

Hi,

Just letting you know I've reviewed your page Women Hurt. It's quite refreshing being able to review an article without adding cleanup tags, so thanks for your contributions!

If you have any questions please let me know.

Regards,

DrStrauss talk 13:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for enlightening me on the usage of various spelling methods, for the unintentional changes I made with the page "every Life Counts". Hereafter, I will take care and I reaized my ignorance on 'Capitalization' too :) Bilingual2000 (talk) 13:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Amnesty International Ireland) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Amnesty International Ireland, Ebelular!

Wikipedia editor Ajpolino just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your contribution! In general, the article relies heavily on references to Amnesty International pages. It would benefit greatly from some outside references to bolster the case that Amnesty International Ireland is independently notable. Let me know if you have any questions about that! Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on Ajpolino's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ajpolino (talk) 23:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quack

Duck! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ebelular. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Dara Quigley

Hello, Ebelular,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Dara Quigley should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dara Quigley .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Icewhiz (talk) 12:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Removal of "NPOV edits"

User: Ebelular you have removed an edit seemingly without consulting the talk page, please clarify where you believe NPOV would is in my edit rather as this edit contained two edits, One stating the fact that this was planned parenthood opinion (as it was sourced start from planned parenthood a major abortion provider (thereby a non neutral party). And my second edit was sourced as counter point, as is present in all other sections. Please utilize talk before hasty changes and please provide sources if you are suggesting changes (preferably non bias sources). 135.23.244.37 (talk) 04:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

I added 2 citations to the statement, in the opinion of Planned Parenthood, a major abortion provider. [5][6] since they provide (based on latest available statistics) 49.64% of abortions in 2014 for USA. 652,639 total from CDC and 323,999 from Planned Parenthood in 2014 from CNN, released by planned parenthood.135.23.244.37 (talk) 05:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.23.244.37 (talk)

Proposed deletion of Mighty Munch

The article Mighty Munch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. st170e 00:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Amnesty

The user you reverted is actually topic-banned from indefinitely from the subjects of Savita Halappanavar, pregnancy, miscarriage and abortion, broadly construed. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 08:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

And he's now received a warning from an admin to stay away from abortion-related articles, broadly construed. Under WP:TBAN, he can be reverted at will for any edits in the topic-banned areas. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Declan Flynn.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ebelular. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Ann Lovett.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Boyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cora Sherlock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Abortion in Ireland

Hi Ebelular! I stumbled upon Wikipedia:WikiProject Abortion in Ireland. It looks like you created the project page but a full-blown WP:WikiProject never materialized. Any objection to me moving the project back to your user space (User:Ebelular/WikiProject Abortion in Ireland)? It seems misleading to have it in project space in its current form. Hope all is well! Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead. Ebelular (talk) 08:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

 Done now at User:Ebelular/WikiProject Abortion in Ireland. Thanks for the quick response! Ajpolino (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Template talk:Infobox organization#More parameters

 You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox organization#More parameters. Italawar (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"First-person adventure" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect First-person adventure has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 25 § First-person adventure until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 15:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of First-person adventure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First-person adventure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First-person adventure (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Alalch E. 08:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)