From your Conservation Biology Professor

edit

It looks like you are making good progress on your Wikipedia assignment for Conservation Biology. Kyleharms (talk) 21:31, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Some of the material in your sandbox was copied directly from your sources (see for example your section "Duties..."). Please make certain that your final draft does not contain material that was directly copied - your Wikipedia contribution must be your own work. Kyleharms (talk) 03:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is still a fair amount of directly copied material in this contribution (I have indicated at least 3 sections with comments in bold type) - this material needs to be removed before you "go live" with this contribution. In addition, the overall treatment seems rather superficial. A case study or two would provide some illustrations of how the Task Force operates. Finally, you should fix your references before you "go live" with this contribution, since some of them are really just different parts of the same online document. Kyleharms (talk) 17:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

As we discussed, for the sections I indicated with comments in bold type, rather than removing them you could explicitly state that they are presented exactly as in the original source. Kyleharms (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply