Editerofmagic

Reply

I'm not entirely sure the claim would be valid as he is not operating the accounts at the same time. It is, of course, up to you - if you want to report it, feel free. However, I note that he has undone your edits and so on, and you might be unhappy about his actions - in this case I would avoid reporting him yet as it may be seen as a personal attack on him. I am not entirely convinced that I'm getting the whole story here, but that's as may be. You should be aware that if successfully reported for sock puppetry, the IP address will be checked and all accounts coming from it will be closed. I'm certainly not going to take any action myself - although the editor in question has not always contributed constructively, I feel that he does have useful contributions to make. In a nutshell, if you think you have enough evidence or reason to report him, do so. But I'd advise caution and I'd also suggest familiarising yourself with what could happen. If there's anything else I can help you with, please feel free to ask me either here, or, preferably, on my talk page. Also, please sign your posts on talk pages by inserting four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks. All the best, Will2710|^Talk! 20:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC) ~~

There is obviously disagreement about the content of the article in question, and I have grown so sick of the constant arguing that I have decided to leave the matter alone. If you wish to report the user in question for vandalism or sock puppetry, you have the tools at your disposal to do so. As for me, I'm staying out of it. The problem is that regardless of what anyone thinks, when people can undo or change what you've done, there is very little you can do about it. If the problem gets solved and everyone agrees to work together on the goal that we all *should* be working towards, I might return to the project. However, for now, I have better things to do with my time, of which I have precious little, than engaging in edit-warring and arguing about things which will ultimately not be done correctly anyhow. If you're really worried, there is a process of vandalism warning you need to go through, and also a process for reporting sock puppetry. These tools are at your disposal, and if you wish to take action, you must do so yourself. I don't wish to get involved. However, I do appreciate your concern and I don't believe for one moment that it is unfounded. Get back to me tonight if you want more information or whatever. Cheers. Will2710|^Talk! 21:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok, i was wrong

“Hyacinth Bucket is a social-climbing snob, she insists her name is pronounced "bouquet" and spends most of the time trying to impress her neighbors and friends. She boasts about her wealthy sister and pretends to be of a more “aristocratic” class than she actually is.” These sentences should be together not separate because she “spends most of the time trying to impress her neighbors and friends.” By boasting about “her wealthy sister and pretends to be of a more “aristocratic” class than she actually is.”, hence currently the plot doesn’t define what it should.

Further sentences are out of control as well; hence I shall revert your edits. I don’t what this to turn into a dispute, however I think you’ll find all punctuations is used correctly and the plot synopsis doesn’t need altering. If you would like to open a debate, rather than making modifications, open up a debate on my talk page.Edito*Magica 21:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

That is ridiculous!!!!!!!!! just because sentences are seperated by a full stop doesn't mean they are not together! dont be so silly. it flows so much better the way i wrote it and i will simply report you for vandalising an article that is clearly better and more sufficient than your own yours sincerely EDITEROFMAGIC

Plot doesn't changing...but the tables do!

Your new user of wikipedia, but if you take an interest in keeping up appearances then join in the episode table debate! see my talk page and K.U.A episode discussion page for more details. Edito*Magica 21:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

How can punctuation be correct when you isist on using both commars and the word and in the same word spacing. Are you unaware of the linguistic rulings behind punctuation??

The plot doen't need changing editerofmagic. It has been adjusted numerous times, and the detail the structure the puntuation is perfect maagico magica!****************

See Oxford comma. Rich Farmbrough, 07:08 11 August 2007 (GMT).

EDITO * INCORRECTO

Updoqwn has seen my plot synopsus, and hasn't changed it. Your use of ountuation is wrong, full stops are needed where commas are and saying hyacinth boost about her wealtlthy sister doesn't suggest that is how she pretends to be of a higer-class. Edito*Magica 23:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

"through..."

It said through boosting about her wealthy sister and pretending to be of more aristcratic class than she actually is. perfecto!

Editerofmagic 23:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Through:from end to end or side to side. Collins English Dictionary. Please sort yourself out, i dont need to say anymore!! the word is totally totally innapropriate

Need help?

Hey guys, feel free to message me for help and tuition! Id be happy to help

HOW!?

I'll be honest, I'm not that bothered, so in the interests of harmony if you wish to add "quest" back in, I will not revert it again. I don't not wish to argue with you, as your near-namesake and I have. But I don't think "quest" is right, and I see nothing wrong with the current sentance. --UpDown 18:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

How to creat a new article!

Simply type in "William Gillberthrope" in the search bar and click "create new page" and your away! Furthermore, i don't think various lexical choices you made in your last post were at all suitable. Some editors my get offended. Edito*Magica 22:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

William gilberthorpe

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on William gilberthorpe, by William Avery (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because William gilberthorpe fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Apparent attack page

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting William gilberthorpe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Pleae refrain from personal attacks such as this, however annoying another editor may be. Rich Farmbrough, 07:10 11 August 2007 (GMT).