Editiorman
Welcome to Editiorman talk page. add your comment in new section.
Editiorman, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Editiorman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
Editiorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not sure why i have been blocked. Editiorman (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have been blocked for being checkuser-confirmed as a sockpuppet of Mytisit- this means that there is technical evidence to support the block. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the evidence indicates that you are, if you are not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Editiorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have being blocked with misunderstanding, someone blocked me for guessing fake account, i see my username is listed on some Mytisit puppet page, till now i didnt made any changes which against wikipedia policy. i guess maybe it happen due to misunderstanding or something other like similar article, shared ip, wrong assumptions or something other. Editiorman (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have not provided any plausible reason to explain the sockpuppetry findings. We know you are operating from the same location, using the same browser, as that other account. Yamla (talk) 17:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Editiorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yalma said same location same browser. same location maybe possible but same browser really :? Editiorman (talk) 03:58, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
)