Editor 2123578337

Hi I am an editor clearly here to build an encyclopedia.Editor 2123578337 (talk)

February 2022

I would never do such a thing to violate Wikipedia policy. i clearly am innocent.Editor 2123578337 (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor 2123578337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I Did nothing wrong and do not know who Jediknight 15 is. Editor 2123578337 (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor 2123578337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I Did nothing wrong. i also do not know who the user is which is why i am incorrectly blocked. i any way i also would not intend cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia though some will think my mistakes are vandalism. i confess to sockpupiting but i did it only for good intentions. other than that i want to be a good user Editor 2123578337 (talk) 09:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. I will upgrade the block to reflect this. This will count against you in any future unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Editor 2123578337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Now that i confessed what i did wrong i read t and Cs i wanted to only be unblocked so i can edit less disruptively and however i have been mistaken to be abusing Wikipedia because of my mistakes which is not intended to be disruptive. i promise.Editor 2123578337 (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

After looking at your contributions, both on this account and User:Jediknight15, I would say you have very little chance of being unblocked at present. I woiuld recommend taking the standard offer: make no edits at all from any account, or anonymously, for 6 months (i.e. until 23 August 2022), and then make a new appeal, concentrating on what positive contributions you could make to Wikipedia. — Voice of Clam 11:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK whatever you sayEditor 2123578337 (talk) 23:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

It is clear from this that you are not willing to wait 6 months without editing, but just intend to vandalise. Therefore I have removed your ability to edit this page. — Voice of Clam 09:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.