Hello Eeamoscopolecrushuva! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! —Khoikhoi 17:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical


Aromanians and Aromanian language

edit

Hi, can you provde an explanation why you removed the Romanian interwikis from these articles? They appear to be valid. Thanks. —Khoikhoi 17:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Because all of the Romanian interwikis contain lies about the Aromanian language and Aromanian culture, and we cannot allow such lies to be said.
I understand, but the articles are still about the Aromanians and the Aromanian language. If you know Romanian, please help correct them. Interwikis should never be removed, however. —Khoikhoi 18:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
It was not our intention to go against Wikipedias rules, mostly because it is a large contribution for our culture. Being aware of this, we promise to not remove interwikis in future. We are sorry for troubling you.
No problem, thanks again. —Khoikhoi 20:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
We are sorry if we sound a bit demanding, we're trying our best to create an Aromanian wikipedia as it should be, so please help us if you can. We'd like to change the "Armâneashti" title every time we type "roa-rup". Is it possible to change it to "Armãneashce"? Also we'd like to put "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" which would be "Di Wikipedia, Entsiclopedia liberã" under every title, can we do this automatically? Thank you in advance. Eeamoscopolecrushuva 21:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate the effort. I think the place to go is this page. Simply get an account there, and leave a comment. —Khoikhoi 03:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Great Britain

edit

I have removed the interwiki link you added to Great Britain. roa-rup:Britania Mare seems to be about the country, which is the United Kingdom, while the term "Great Britain" is a largely graphical one for the island that contains England, Scotland and Wales. See British Isles (terminology) for a fuller discussion. Thanks/wangi 22:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aromanians again

edit

In order to add a dispute tag, you're going to have to explain what parts of the article needs to be fixed on the talk page. Please cite specific examples, so that we can eventually remove the dispute tag. Thanks! Khoikhoi 21:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit to Aromanian language (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Aromanian language

edit

I know your anti-Romanian attitude from your comments on roa-rup.wikipedia (for example roa-rup:Talk:Prota frãndzã). However, please refrain from pushing that point of view anywhere on Wikipedia. Your edits at Aromanian language qualify as vandalism, as you deleted huge chunks of text supported by sources. While your editing of the "Tatã a nostru" language sample might be legitimate, deleting of several whole sections was surely not. You asked for sources: They are given in the article, under References and External links.

I suggest you first discuss any major edits on the talk page before making them. — AdiJapan  08:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Me again. In your last edit at Aromanians you give an interesting explanation of the A in Armãn, that is, a Greek negation, thus implying that Aromanian means non-Romanian. However, your language has many words starting with a, such as arîd, armîn, asparg, aumbra, avispa (corresponding to Romanian rîd, rămîn, sparg, umbra, viespe), so the most plausible explanation for that A is phonetical, not lexical. Besides, the Farsherots often call themselves ramani instead of armani, which leads to the same conclusion. — AdiJapan  14:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Aromanians

edit

Hey, I've noticed the conflict over at the Aromanians article. A suggestion: instead of edit warring, try discussing the changes you want to make on the talk page. Explain your reasons for your reverts, and ask for an explanation from Bogdan and Francis why they reverted you. That way, if you follow the path of dispute resolution, you'll eventually be able to come to a compromise and the conflict will be resolved. Khoikhoi 05:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

When you edit an article please make sure you keep all corrections that were made. With your recent edit at Aromanians you removed a source, some legitimate spelling corrections, and several other useful edits, which I am sure you had nothing against. I suspect you edited an older version, but even then you must be careful not to remove other people's work.
Also please stop using the edit summary as a battle field. If you have anything to say to other editors you can always do it calmly on the article talk page, as Khoikhoi suggests above. — AdiJapan  07:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Aromanian flag

edit

Hi. I see you've uploaded Image:Flambura armãneascã.JPG representing the Aromanian flag. Do you have a reference for this flag? As you know, any information published by Wikipedia must be verifiable in reliable sources.

On the internet I could only find these two flags: [1] and [2], of which the second looks like yours, but has a slightly different design and a different color. Other sources, including the Aromanian Association of Paris, claim that Aromanians do not have a flag at all [3]. Could you bring some light into this? Thanks. — AdiJapan  03:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for replying and explaining the situation. Certainly, it's not easy to find sources about the Aromanian symbols, especially because there is no country to officially establish and promote those symbols. You mentioned an article by Dimo Dimcev about this subject. Does that article have a drawing or a picture of the flag? If it does, could you please scan and post that picture on Wikipedia? If you do that, I offer to improve the current file Image:Flambura armãneascã.JPG by redrawing the flag in a more professional way. (You can check other flags I drew for Wikipedia: [4], [5].) Specifically, what I need to see is the exact shape, size and position of all elements, and the precise shade of yellow to use for them. I've already made a drawing based on this flag, with the blue color replaced by deep yellow, but I would need some kind of confirmation. — AdiJapan  06:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Do the Armãnji have a flag ?Or is it another Romanian propaganda ? Kp4816 (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Position on Romanians

edit

Hi, could you please clarify your position on Romanians as opposed to Aromanians, both ethnically and linguistically? Because you seem to have a view similar to the Macedonians in regards to the Bulgarians. Alex 202.10.89.28 10:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Matushi

edit

Thanks for your help. Have a nice day. --Koppany 12:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

translation

edit

hi i was just wondering if you were able to translate this text for me please? "La sosirea lor în România, aceşti grămuşteni au fost colonizaţi ca "macedoneni", iar cetăţenia regatului România le-a fost acordată abia după un deceniu" thank you . PMK1 (talk) 05:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Latin

edit

I am not sure whether you are familiar with a WikiProject or not (a description can be found here) but I'm planning on starting one for the Latin language. This is mainly because Latin is and has been such an important language in the history of western civilization but the article is only rated a 'C'. If you support my proposal then please sign your name on the proposal page here. 95jb14 (talk) 14:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Myzeqeja

edit

I don't understand why Myzeqeja is named Muzachia. I think it should be the other way round. If you do me this favour, and redirect it to where it belongs, I promise I'll post the Aromanian part of the Lexikon Tetraglosson on the net: "Dumnitzau fetse tserra, loclu, soarle", ect... --Guildenrich 19:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guildenrich (talkcontribs)

Cause this is how it was called by the Byzantine (Greeks) and it is still called like this by both Greeks and Aromanians of Greece Kp4816 (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Native Latin Speaker?

edit

In what way are you a native Latin speaker?--Herb-Sewell (talk) 16:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nobody is a "native" Latin speaker as it is extinct.All the Romance languages are coming from Vulgar or Simple Latin spoken from the plebes and the romanized Kp4816 (talk) 15:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

23:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

12:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello

edit

Hi are you Aromanian ? If yes hwere are you from ? Kp4816 (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Flambura armãneascã.JPG

edit
 

The file File:Flambura armãneascã.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply