Egermino
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
edit
|
Kurzweil article
editHi Egermino. I've seen that the Kurzweil article has been completely rewritten. It was great before, and it seems it was you who wrote it. Criticism of Kurzweil's ideas was there, but right now most of the article has a disparaging tone. It's full of subjective statements, petty attacks on Kurzweil himself. That has no place in Wikipedia, it should be simply about the facts. For example, should the wikipedia article describe Kurzweil as "obsessive" with living for "absolutely as long as possible"? I think it's all ridiculous. You had done an excellent job. Please respond to this message here, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.39.240.203 (talk) 05:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC) I don't know how to talk in this. Still listening? Egermino (talk) 18:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Your T-54/55 article edits.
editHello.
A user named YMB29 is having issues with what you wrote about T-54/55 tanks being outclassed by their Western counterparts. Now I tried to explain to him/her that it is sourced but he won't listen. Can you talk with him/her so that we can end this issue once and for all?
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 10:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)