Eightbenny
Welcome!
edit
|
February 2021
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Chespirito, you may be blocked from editing. I am placing this as a third-level warning, as this is the third warning this month. Please be aware that as per WP:TPG, it is your right to remove this warning, but it will remain in your talk page history for administrators or any other editors to view. Peaceray (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Mexican Spanish, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 01:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Cantinflas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 04:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Izno (talk) 05:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)