Ejajsheik23

Welcome!

Hello, Ejajsheik23!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SwitchBot (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SwitchBot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Ejajsheik23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, I have already edited the content as per the requirements. If you have the time, could you please take another look to see if there are any remaining issues? I conducted extensive research on the brand using search engines, and the information I added is from independent media outlets. Is this additional content appropriate? Ejajsheik23 (talk) 13:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing

Hello Ejajsheik23. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ejajsheik23. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ejajsheik23|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 12:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I have been wrongly accused. If I were indeed a paid editor, why would I seek the assistance of reviewers? Why not simply post and claim my compensation? My intention in seeking experienced editors is solely to find help in improving the content of topics that interest me, in compliance with the platform's requirements. Does actively seeking the assistance of reviewers make me a paid editor? Yes, the reviewer rightly pointed out that I did not follow the AfC process, and I acknowledge this mistake. Consequently, I am now open to going through the AfC process, and I am committed to resolving issues in a positive manner. If my initial communication was poorly worded, I am willing to amend it. If my content was not precise enough, I will revise it. Just as I said, if I had an employer, why would I go to such great lengths to seek your assistance? Would I be "committing suicide" by approaching you?? Ejajsheik23 (talk) 13:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

You have not been accused of anything. Theroadislong asked you a question – IMO not unreasonably, given your edit history – which is pretty much standard practice.

As for your rhetorical question of "Why not simply post", to be fair, that's what you first did try to do, by publishing this article directly. It's only after it was moved to the draft space that you are "now open to going through the AfC process".

Moving on to a different point, and still without accusation, let me in turn ask you a question: have you previously edited Wikipedia under a different user account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Reviewer, to clarify, I do not have multiple accounts; this is my only account. In my previous responses, what I intended to convey is that if I genuinely wanted to bypass AfC, I wouldn't have sought help in the teahouse and would have simply waited patiently. Why would I go through the trouble of requesting assistance if I were intentionally trying to sneakily publish something? Thank you for your thoroughness. Ejajsheik23 (talk) 10:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:SwitchBot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:SwitchBot. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SwitchBot (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SwitchBot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SwitchBot (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SwitchBot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 09:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Ejajsheik23 (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Z812483032 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Z812483032. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 18:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)