If you would like some questions,warnings or information feel free to let me know on my talkpage

Recent edit to Alexa Bliss

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alexa Bliss, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Happy holidays~! Babymissfortune 04:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays to you to ! ElectronicBlitz (talk) 04:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

ElectronicBlitz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi ElectronicBlitz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Royal Rumble (2019) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You need to discuss on the talk page before changing the match order again, or you will be blocked. JTP (talkcontribs) 20:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes but I Warned that I don't want conflict so I want to keep the preshow on top of the main card on then Royal Rumble (2019) page.ElectronicBlitz (talk) 21:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

That doesn't matter. Our style guide states that matches are not to be moved until the event begins. I don't know what you are trying to accomplish going against a policy based around consensus. JTP (talkcontribs) 21:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello, ElectronicBlitz, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! STATic message me! 23:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElectronicBlitz (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was not trolling all i wanted to do was to help I am a completely different user I am not identical as someone else's account. ElectronicBlitz (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Given the (now removed) personal attacks you made here on this talk page, I have revoked your ability to edit here too. See WP:UTRS if you wish to make another unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ElectronicBlitz (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23928 was submitted on Feb 12, 2019 12:47:39. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply