User talk:ElliotGuy0000

Comprehensive merge of discussions on User talk:ElliotGuy0000 (signatured ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2026 (UTC))

Welcome!

Hello, ElliotGuy0000! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started

• Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset
• How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

• Get help at the Teahouse
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Where to ask questions
• Department directory
• Request administrator attention

Policies and Guidelines

• Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research
• Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines
• What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

---

• Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule
• Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy
• External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry
• Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community

• Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program
• Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
• No personal attacks • Resolving disputes
• Build consensus • Village pump
• Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists
• The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)

Things to do

• Task Center • Be bold in editing
• Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles
• Join a WikiProject • Translating articles
• Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism

Miscellaneous

• Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs
• User pages • Talk pages
• Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Hello, I'm Peaceray. An edit that you recently made to Case sensitivity seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

I accidentally left it behind. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 10:18, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Template:Polandball-based article for discussion

Template:Polandball-based article has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the nomination on the Templates for discussion page. Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 11:10, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Where are the discussions? ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm not making templates for vandalism, user. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Please don't merge discussions into a single heading

Hi. Please don't merge discussions into a single level-two heading, as it interferes with readability and can give the incorrect impression that several discussions are related when they are not. The talk page guidelines state that Mixing it all into one long post complicates discussion. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @SuperPianoMan9167, but not doing this strips off comprehensiveness. I do this to clean up the Table of Contents. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:41, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I also did this because I discovered the fact that discussions can be merged or split. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:46, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

To do this, change == Heading 2 == to a lower level (i.e., level 3–6). ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:48, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Its unhelpful, just leave talk pages as how they're formatted automatically Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 09:48, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @Finnfrog99, but it somehow gives a minor benefit: comprehensiveness. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:49, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

No it doesnt, what does comprehensiveness have to do with this? Leave the talk pages as how wikipedia has been set up to format them automatically. We have the WP:Manual of Style for this

It is misleading, it makes it seems as they are connected moreso than just being discussion relatign to the article, which them being on the talk page already makes clear Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 09:51, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I now merged this discussion with my comprehensive listing of discussions. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:54, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Talk pages are already comprehensive listings of discussions, thats what a talk page is Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 10:07, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I want to comprehensively merge them into one. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 10:39, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

A discussion can also be a comprehensive listing. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 10:40, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

@Finnfrog99

@[[User:SuperPianoMan9167|SuperPianoMan9167]

What do you want for this? ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 10:44, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

If this gets incorrect impressions, there are still reply buttons on the merged discussions, so there's no need for confusion, fellow editor @SuperPianoMan9167. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:44, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Custom Tag

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Custom Tag, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

This was my hard work making my first template, why did someone speedy delete it? ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I wasn't testing. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 20:38, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I hate my templates being speedy deleted while they're vital. ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Custom Tag

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Custom Tag, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 22:12, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for and apparent inability to edit productively at this time. Your edits are unhelpful and end up eating up volunteer time cleaning up and you don't appear amendable to adjusting your behaviour when concerns are raised. There may be a time when you are able to edit constructively and collaboratively, but that time is not now.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElliotGuy0000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

I was blocked for disruptive editing

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

I don't know

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

No

ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 09:16, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you cannot tell us how you were disruptive or what constructive edits you wish to make, we will need to keep you blocked to prevent your disruption from occurring. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElliotGuy0000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Disruptive editing: significant CIR issues

Decline reason:

Duplicate request RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElliotGuy0000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?

Disruptive editing: significant CIR issues

If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

Yes

ElliotGuy0000 (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You again give no reason why we should unblock you. As you cannot even fill out the unblock request correctly, the CIR concerns are of even more an issue. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.