Ephraim Kagwa

Welcome!

Hello, Ephraim Kagwa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Kalimbwe (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Kalimbwe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Kalimbwe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Ephraim Kagwa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ephraim Kagwa was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 17:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Collen Maine

The article Collen Maine has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Joseph Chipango Kalimbwe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Joseph Chipango Kalimbwe. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Joseph Kalimbwe. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Joseph Kalimbwe. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 21:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Kalimbwe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph Kalimbwe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 21:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Joseph Kalimbwe, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 21:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Please enter always an URL, if you use "cite web"

Please enter always an URL (i.e. a web link), if you use "cite web". You should copy and paste the complete template including the curly brackets:

{{cite web |url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}} 

Otherwise your references will not be displayed correctly, and thus your articles look unprofessional.

--NearEMPTiness (talk) 00:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Kalimbwe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph Kalimbwe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 01:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mcebo Dlamini

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mcebo Dlamini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Collen Maine

The article Collen Maine has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 01:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Collen Maine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Collen Maine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:37, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Dear Reddogsix

Kindly help have me unblocked. I was blocked on 5 days ago and had my block indefinite time expire but I am still blocked for my then violation despite time of my block having been expired by two days. Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ephraim Kagwa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

reddogsix (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ephraim Kagwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21820 was submitted on Jun 14, 2018 22:06:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello

The review has closed but my email says I must use my talk to request unblock. Can you kindly unblock me since my endifinate block ended two days ago but yet I cannot make any contributions Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 23:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Unblock User Request

I was blocked from editing and my indefinite block passed a day ago but still I have not been unblocked. I do fully understand the reasons for it and wish to make meaningful contributions. I submitted a ticket for unlock but was referred here to my talk.

Can any admin unblock me. Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 23:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

• You are blocked for an indefinite period for abuse of multiple accounts. There is no expiry date and you will remain blocked until you explain the reasons for your block and convince the reviewing admin it would benefit Wikipedia to remove the block. You will need to use the unblock template noted in your block message above. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

I just gave my reason below Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 23:41, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Unblock User Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ephraim Kagwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wish to have my user account unblocked because I do wish to make meaningful contributions to Wikipedia and acknowledge my block as having been due to me having created account. I feel blocking me entirely for the whole process would be an unjustice since I am learning the does and don'ts of Wikipedia which I will keep. Furthermore, I want to be unblocked and be able to give substantial articles and this time submit as drafts before opting for publication as I feel there is much relevance I can still bring towards the growth and expansion of WikipediaEphraim Kagwa (talk) 23:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL^{Query me!} 02:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clarified Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ephraim Kagwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wish to resubmit my unblock request for these reasons 1. I will not any attempts to use any other account besides this one to make any edits to Wikipedia 2. I submit that the previous user accounts be deleted 3. I want to continue making changes and learning the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia and expand my knowledge of the edits 4. I senserely apologies for the mistake made and will not try to make edits and/or disruptive. 5. I will make draft submissions for editor reviews to all articles I wish to make Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 07:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Reviewing your repeated requests, it's clear to me that you currently do not seem to have with competence to edit Wikipedia. What I can recommend is to walk away completely from Wikipedia for at least 6 months, if not more. Do not edit on ANY account, no IP, no alternative account. If you can do that, request an unblock then, this might be seen more positively. Repeatedly posting unblock requests every few hours is not going to lead you to being unblocked, and in fact may be seen as disruptive. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3rd Unblock Submission

Hello I am requesting to be unblocked from participating in Wikipedia. I have already submitted 3 unblock requests and in each explained why I want to be unblocked. Each admin who has attended to those has asked me to give reasons and I have done so.

I feel it's unfair that despite giving my explanations, other administrators come and ask that I give more reasons and then when I do so, they go silent and don't respond to me. Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 17:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

If an article was deleted by an administrator, it should not be addedd again and certainly not duplicated. This is called vandalism, i.e. it is seen as not helpful for the project. Probably, the administrators are not convinced yet that you will avoid vandalism in future. Maybe you should tell them that you promise to study the rules and obay them. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Account

Hello

I once again save another request for unblock permission. I did not intend on make another submission but seeing as I am receiving different texts, I fell compelled.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ephraim Kagwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will fully read through Wikipedia rules and regulations and will never create any other account besides this one. I also promise never to vandalise anything and always make draft submissions should I see need to make it. I really do feel, I admins form part of a select few tasked to provide help whenever nessessary and I make this submission once again, hoping my wish to be unblocked and given another chance will be granted considering my unconditional efforts in acknowledging my wrongs and other submisions i made to get unblocked. I would like to be unlocked in order that I can make contributions to Wikipedia following the learned lessons. Can you kindly give me another chance as I promised genuinely never to repeat my mistake. Hoping for assistanceEphraim Kagwa (talk) 22:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Closing duplicate request RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unlock Requirement

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ephraim Kagwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

hello I was blocked from contributing on Wikipedia and my unblock expired on Thursday at 19:13. My block was due to having created more than one account. I acknowledged my flaw and give 4 reasons as to why I think I must now be unlocked (see my talk) so I could make learn more and make meaningful contributions to Wikipedia. My previous reasons were submitted and I explained to admins that I want to maintain only this account but still cannot contribute. I few administrators make a select few tasked with responsibilities of maintain this platform and have since advised, read the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. Can you kindly view my reasons and help me get unblocked in order that I can continue to participate and learn from this.Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Closing duplicate request RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock User Request

I would like to once again, based on all my previous reasons, request to be unblocked from editing and partaking in Wikipedia.

I have made many request submissions and would senserely want to be unblocked. I would really appreciate to learn more from here. Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Unlock

Hi I would like to request an Admin to unlock me. I my block expiry date passed last week and I want to take part in Wikipedia.

Kind regards Ephraim Kagwa (talk) 08:48, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

You are blocked indefinitely your block has no expiry date. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chifubu High School

Hello, Ephraim Kagwa. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chifubu High School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)