User talk:ErrantX/Archive/2012/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:ErrantX. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please comment on Talk:Information technology
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Information technology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey ErrantX
Hey ErrantX
I really need to contact you about the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Gilbert as I am his representation. I have left an incident report on Wikipedia. I can not unlock it and I need a small article made and locked from editing if possible. Please let me know if you can help out. Thank you!
--Filmsandtv2012report (talk) 04:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker)Hey, not to butt in here, but just so you know: articles on Wikipedia are not locked from editing (called page protection in Wikipedia parlance) unless they absolutely have to be because of edit-warring or vandalism, and never fully-protected permanently; they will not be protected merely to enforce a particular version of an article. See the protection policy for more details on when and why pages are locked from editing. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 05:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Cheers and Thank you! Understood --Filmsandtv2012report (talk) 05:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
User:JohnClarknew
Hi Errant. I'm sure you remember the issues with User:JohnClarknew and the John Clark (actor) article. I recently had cause to make some minor edits to John Clark (actor), but unfortunately User:JohnClarknew still seems to be fully engaged with the article. See: User talk:Onorem#What R U talking about? and Talk:John Clark (actor)#Memphisto, at it again
User:JohnClarknew's editing seems to break every main Wikipedia policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Ownership of articles, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:No personal attacks, Wikipedia:Edit warring, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Consensus, Wikipedia:No original research, but at the same time we should never forget that there is a person involved here.
To avoid antagonizing User:JohnClarknew, I won't respond to his edits or comments at the moment. But it would be good if the admins could formulate a plan of action, which will swiftly bring this longstanding issue to an end.
Also, as User:JohnClarknew is obviously unhappy with other editors editing an article about himself; has anyone asked him if he would instead agree to the article being deleted in it's entirety from Wikipedia? memphisto 10:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
CDNIS
I did some additional editing, and semi protected. This should deal with it. DGG ( talk ) 03:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Grant Shapps
Noticed your involvement on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_Shapps and therefore wished to draw your attention to:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/sep/08/grants-shapps-altered-wikipedia-entry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.72.236.203 (talk) 14:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
Please comment on Talk:Monty Hall problem
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Monty Hall problem. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Elizabeth Cotton, Lady Hope
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth Cotton, Lady Hope. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hey Tom - Thanks a lot for the copyedit! ;) Theopolisme 20:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
Please comment on Talk:Random access
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Random access. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, would you mind replying at the above SPI which you started? A checkuser has requested more information before running a check. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2012 (UTC)