User talk:ErrantX/Archive/2013/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:ErrantX. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK for Operation Ironside
 | On 3 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Operation Ironside, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Operation Ironside was a Second World War military deception, targeting the Bay of Biscay, in support of the D-Day landings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Ironside. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
Please comment on Talk:Silk Road (marketplace)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Silk Road (marketplace). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
You were mentioned
You were mentioned here [[1]]. I have been accused in this discussion of putting words in peoples mouths, so I am requesting you look in and verify my quote of your statement. Thanks. Smatprt (talk) 00:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
WikiChevrons
|
The WikiChevrons | |
| Hi Tom, just wanted to acknowledge the great work you've been doing within MilHist lately. I know I pestered you into doing a little reviewing to help with the backlog, but half a dozen thorough reviews in two days is more than I had a right to ask. And of course you've written some brilliant articles of your own. Keep up the good work—I promise you it's appreciated. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
- Hey, thanks. And seriously no worries. I realised how annoying it was not to get reviews on my articles, so it seems only fair!! I'm cautious about reviewing because I can be very opinionated :P but so long as there are no complaints then all good. --Errant (chat!) 22:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Opinionated is good when reviewing—there's no reason we can't ask questions and make suggestions, and most nominators are usually so happy you took the time to read their article that they're only too happy to listen to your suggestions, even if they're mad (the suggestions, that is, not the nominators! ;) ). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Heh, I think you have to be a bit mad to work here... --Errant (chat!) 22:52, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- Opinionated is good when reviewing—there's no reason we can't ask questions and make suggestions, and most nominators are usually so happy you took the time to read their article that they're only too happy to listen to your suggestions, even if they're mad (the suggestions, that is, not the nominators! ;) ). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Suicide
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Double hyphen in signature
It's a small thing but it annoys me. Your bot signs its posts with a double hyphen (--). It should be using a dash (– or —). See Dash. Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Talk about petty issues...this is almost laughable. —Theopolisme (talk) 15:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
(edit conflict)See Bikeshedding. --Errant (chat!) 15:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not a bot, I am a free man! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't realize this was a sensitive subject. Kendall-K1 (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
From experience I've found that for recent events, PC is more suitable than semi-protection, since anons do add constructive content. I changed your semi-protection to PC1, but feel free to revert if vandalism becomes a major problem. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Nope, that makes a lot of sense :) --Errant (chat!) 22:42, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
Milhist FA, A-Class and Peer Reviews January–March 2013
|
Military history service award | |
| By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the period January–March 2013, I am delighted to award you the Military history WikiProject award. Anotherclown (talk) 23:44, 27 April 2013 (UTC) |