Eugenialiutaya
He is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Marvin Ash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Band, Soloist and Jack Crawford
- Alice Bah Kuhnke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Dominique Atkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Balladeer
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Overlinking
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Please read MOS:OVERLINK Billhpike (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
editHello Eugenialiutaya, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to John Brignell have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Gavin Bone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Ian Blurton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Change of Heart, Hamilton and Psychedelic
- Marvin Ash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Soloist and Jack Crawford
- Chiara Fiorini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Acquarossa
- David Bedella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Panto
- Eddie Barbash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Member
- Edwin Orion Brownell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Eastern Front
- Estelle Balet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Wild card
- Henry Capell, 1st Baron Capell of Tewkesbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Whig
- Paul Brandt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Warner
- Phadeppa Dareppa Chaugule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bout
- Stuart Brawley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Firestone
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Famousbirthdays.com as a source
editHi Eugenialiutaya . I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Whitfield Crane. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing it out. Now I know that this an unreliable source and won't use it in the future.Eugenialiutaya (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Conrad of Ascoli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Ascoli
- Dabheog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Disciple
- Daniel of Moscow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vladimir
- Henry Capell, 1st Baron Capell of Tewkesbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Whig
- James H. Conyers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Naval Academy
- Peter Theo Curtis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to New Republic
- Phadeppa Dareppa Chaugule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bout
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Friendly advice
editFurther to my comment at the help desk, now that I come here I see that you're making a few mistakes along the way. It's not a problem, we all had to learn the ropes. You might want to slow down just a little though, and put a bit more thought in before hitting Publish changes. One good way is to click Show preview and then read the whole paragraph, not just your own addition, as if you were another editor, and ask yourself if you're doing the right thing. Even a simple bit of rewording can be tricky if the person who originally wrote it spent a while pouring over it and making it work in the context of a whole section or the entire article. And if you make a multitude of similar changes to many articles in a short space of time they can take a lot of work to undo if it turns out that you're repeating a mistake. You might benefit from waiting for other editors' feedback, if any, before proceeding at a rate of knots. Anyway, it looks like you're well on your way to getting settled in so feel free to ignore my advice. I'm not the world's greatest copyeditor or the ultimate Wikipedian by any stretch of the imagination. Happy editing! nagualdesign 12:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your piece of advice! I feel so interested sometimes so I can't stop:) I will be very pleased in the future if i can ask for your advice about editing!)--Eugenialiutaya (talk) 12:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Some notes on your editing
editHello, Eugenialiutaya. I've just made some edits on the article Marcelo dascal which has been edited by you previously amd have some observations on the theme. It is very good that your editing refer the other Wikipedia articles to be them all linked, or cross-referenced. But I see that you has a lot of disambiguation links on your talk page. That's why you should do this in a proper way, using the template "name of the article in wikipedia|your word" made inside of square bracket to avoid such situations in your future edits. I hope it was useful note for you. Lyupant (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice!)--Eugenialiutaya (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Ivan Kusnjer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Academy of Music
- Joan Embury Cochran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Queen Margaret College
- Siegfried Lehman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to British Mandate
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catherine Boone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APSA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Vladimir Djambazov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Horn
- William Henry Balgarnie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Anabasis
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Your edits to Lisa De Leeuw
editHello. I reverted your edits to Lisa De Leeuw for two reasons. IMDb is not a reliable source for biographical information. This content has been removed before and your addition was a close paraphrase of its source. Also, please note that the porn project considers porn filmographies to be inappropriate. That also has been removed before. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks you for your comment! I will note this!Eugenialiutaya (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2
editAn automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Elfrida Rathbone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Kings Cross and Crèche
- Ella Endlich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hansa
- Lou L. LaBrant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hinkley
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ludwig David Morenz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DFG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Conflict of interest policy
editHello, Eugenialiutaya. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for welcoming my contributions to Wikipedia, I appreciate that you've noticed it! And thank you very much for reminding me about general Wikipedia rules, I have absolutely no intention to violate any of these mentioned above! Have a good day!Eugenialiutaya (talk) 11:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Have you been assigned articles to work on? --Ronz (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean?Eugenialiutaya (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Is someone suggesting which articles you edit? --Ronz (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
I choose myself:) Eugenialiutaya (talk) 17:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Would you like to share you come across Nofel Izz, or any of the articles you recently edited? --Ronz (talk) 18:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
I found this article in some BLP stub listsEugenialiutaya (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- I strongly suggest that you avoid such articles for a while and take time to learn Wikipedia better. You appear to be speeding through your editing with very little awareness of the quality of references, the appropriateness of content, and basic layout and markup. Biographical articles are an extremely poor choice to work on when you're still having such problems. You've been given similar advice previously. I hope you'll consider it. --Ronz (talk) 04:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anthony Kerr, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Taylor and Peter King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Newbery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bucks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Eugenialiutaya. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)