User talk:EurovisionNim/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, EurovisionNim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Aeroflot Flight 593 have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:07, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Aeroflot Flight 593, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, EurovisionNim. You have new messages at Talk:Aeroflot Flight 593.
Message added 13:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I strongly encourage you to comment on the matter. The modifications you have been doing to the page are considered as unsourced, not in compliance with WP:VERIFY, which is a core content policy. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Qatar Airways may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the plane landed at KLIA. The pilot was identified as a 43-year-old Indian, Ajay Kukreja. <ref>{{http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/qatar/qatar-airways-pilot-who-died-during-flight-was-indian-1.696419
• qatar/qatar-airways-pilot-who-died-during-flight-was-indian-1.696419 Pilot suffers heart attack}]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mitsubishi Outlander may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:Mitubushi Outlander 2014.JPG|thumbnail|Mitubushi Outlander Facelifted (Australia]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scotch College, Perth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perisher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your email message

Please be more specific? What do you think I shouldn't have deleted? --Versageek 15:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skitube Alpine Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comeng. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bidgee (talk) 03:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on ANZAC Parade, Canberra. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 13:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mitsubishi Outlander may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Outlander Australia2014.JPG|thumbnail|right|Mitsubishi Outlander ES 3rd Generation (Australia) (Front]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taxicab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Falcon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streaking, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Collingwood and WCE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canberra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Falcon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perisher Valley, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Cow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Request for adminship

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EurovisionNim ----

Hi: It won't transclude until you actually create it. You should look at the instructions again.

However, with less than 1,000 edits, your RfA would probably be speedy closed anyway. Did you read the guidance pages linked there? I sincerely suggest that if you want to be an admin, you read them carefully and start gathering the experience and policy knowledge that RfA voters tend to want to see in a candidate, then think about it again when you have at least 5,000 edits (that appears to be the minimum voters require). Yngvadottir (talk) 12:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

(e/c) Hi EurovisionNim. I noticed your edits to WP:RFA on my watchlist and I thought I'd save you some grief in advance. General expectations for an admin candidate are significant experience with Wikipedia in general, as well as significant experience with administrative tasks in particular, such as participation in articles for deletion discussions, well done Wikipedia:New pages patrol, including accurate speedy deletion tagging or other deletion processes, reporting vandalism, warning users, doing various maintenance tasks, helping with backlogs, etc. Most admin candidates have a minimum of 6,000 edits and at least a year of edits which include such experience. In short, you would have no chance at this time to pass an RfA. See Wikipedia:Not now, Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation(s)

I have encountered possible copyright violation(s):

• Your addition to Wikipedia: [1]
• Source: [2]

Some or all of the content appears to be copy pasted. Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites.

If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.

For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

One more:

• Your addition to Wikipedia: [3]
• Source: [4]

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Thankyou Anna, Nim Bhharathhan (talk) 08:27, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Block

Your voluntary block is now in force for 3 months with no email permitted. You can sill edit your talk page, or edit with an IP. Why have you contested the block on commons when you want to be blocked here? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Photos reply

Hi,

My apologies for the delay -- I've been inactive on here of late. In taking photos, the best ones will have an uncluttered background and an angle that shows a fair bit of the side of the car. Both of these can be done in parking lots but the better photos you'll find on this site tend to be cars parked on the street instead. It will all come down to the individual settings, angles, and lighting that you find.

Best of luck! IFCAR (talk) 01:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EurovisionNim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have already set a wikibreak enforcer so I do not need the block as then I will have to wait when the wikibreak enforcer retires to be back but I would like an unblock.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as the unblock for this account needs to be made by you while you're logged in. In your next unblock request, you should answer Graeme Bartlett's question about resisting the desire to email other users. PhilKnight (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why are you using User:60.224.249.55? Why did you want to be blocked here at all? I don't understand what you are trying to accomplish.  Mr.choppers | ✎  05:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

• @Graeme Bartlett:- what's your opinion of this? If an editor requests a block, and then requests an unblock, should we keep them blocked? Also, any idea how we should approach logged out edits? PhilKnight (talk) 20:29, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

• An unblock should be requested from the user, though I don't know if the wikibreak enforcer stops own talk page editing or not. EurovisionNim was getting into trouble by sending emails on commons, and I suspect he wanted to prevent the opportunity to send email on Wikipedia as well; and so avoid more trouble. So EurovisionNim, can you log on to make your request here? Can you resist the desire for emailing that might cause trouble to you? (If the answers are yes I think we can unblock, it's not as if it was a request to concentrate on studying for exams or something with a particular time period). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2014 (UTC)