July 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Richard Garriott. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caidh (talk) 02:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Tatara

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Paul Tatara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Raid call, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so I have moved it to Draft:Raid call so that you can continue working on it. If you have any questions, please leave a note on this page. Please consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - MrX 14:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, your draft is still there waiting to be expanded. You could ask at requested articles for help. If no-one works on it for a few months more, it might get deleted. Rankersbo (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Raid call

edit
 

Hello, Evilcasper. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Raid call".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sad Alice Said

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sad Alice Said requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NottNott talk|contrib 15:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sad Alice Said

edit
 

The article Sad Alice Said has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 06:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

You have been reported on WP:AN/3RR for continued vandalism on Sports in Kansas City. 2601:194:4100:78C0:E891:70F2:7A50:2561 (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@2601:194:4100:78C0:E891:70F2:7A50:2561 This was not vandalism, AFL records are kept by the NFL post merger. This information is available on NFL.com. Evilcasper (talk) 23:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@2601:194:4100:78C0:E891:70F2:7A50:2561 I will gladly discuss this with you further if you wish. Evilcasper (talk) 04:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply