Wikipedia

User talk:F.Moshammad/sandbox

< User talk:F.Moshammad
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Mtrowers
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Mtrowers
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) concise
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Nice
Grammar & composition Correct
Other comments Nice Job!

Mtrowers (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply




Edit #1 Pre-edit review

edit

Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor: Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length of edit wasn’t too long but was short and simple

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes used textbook information

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes I/O Psych is adherent

Wikiformatting: Good Formatting

Grammar & composition: Good grammar & composition

Other comments: Bulletin points were a good choice!


User:A_Bhagwandin (talk)



Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Ant_N_York
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments Good Job!

Ant N York (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pre-edit reviews Edit # 1

edit
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy
Date of review 5/13/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length of edit
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Textbook info accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Format
Grammar & composition Good grammar & compostition
Other comments Good edit!

[[Angela Sandy (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Hmehta0120

Date of review: 4/24/2013

Name of editor: F. Moshammad

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 4/24/2013

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/24/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short): I find it pretty lengthy but then again, you are discussing two different type of test the Interest test and Aptitude test.

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A (read comment in comment section)

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit):Very much accurate to the textbook information and got the most important parts out from them.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed:N/A---textbook base

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): N/A---textbook base

Wikiformatting: Very well for matting.

Grammar & composition: Well put together and stated. Didn’t find any mishaps

Other comments: Seem great to me, great idea to add test base to the article. The length of it seems well enough to support information to both tests. Only advice is try to see if you could become creative with it (such as bullet points and etc). Side note if you do add an image to the page such as someone taking the test from clip art, or example of one of your test would add more character to the page.

Hmehta0120 (talk) 03:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


F.Moshammad (talk) 03:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:Fernando18
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/1/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/1/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) need a image if possible
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Very accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Good article and topic
Wikiformatting N/A
Grammar & composition None
Other comments Very informative


Name of student reviewer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ashleydf Ashley De Freitas
Date of review 5/14/13
Name of editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nae0408 Moshammad Fatima
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nae0408/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good
Image (needed/appropriate) Have one, appropriate
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate
Wikiformatting Good
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments None

108.41.250.159 (talk) 19:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

reviews for pre Edit # 2 Performance appraisals starts from here

edit
Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:Xyzbb1253
Date of review 5/10/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** User:F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Satisfactory
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Precise
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) N/A
Wikiformatting Formatted for Wikipedia
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments None

Pre edit peer review

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey
Date of review 5/15/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:F.Moshammad
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:F.Moshammad/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the edit is not too long. It is a good amount.
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Textbook information is accurately edited.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed None.
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The information presented is related to I/O Psychology.
Wikiformatting The formatting is good.
Grammar & composition Grammar and composition are good.
Other comments Nice job.

Joan Bailey (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:F.Moshammad/sandbox&oldid=555374498"