User talk:Faizan/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

January 2013

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Faizanal-badri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 15:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. You have made a number of edits which are clearly not minor but have marked them minor. Please don't do this anymore, thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Glad to be of assistance

And thanks for your message on my talk page. Dougweller (talk) 14:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Responded

Note that I moved the section to the bottom of my talk page before responding, because we usually keep talk pages (article and user) from oldest to newest, so the newest threads go to the bottom. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

for correcting a mistake i did here. Instead of changing the caption, i reverted the edit, and forgot to re-add the image. Thanks again! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 10:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!! I was pleased to see your coperation, Thanks for your reply! Faizan (talk) 10:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Lahore-Metro-Bus-Service.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lahore-Metro-Bus-Service.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Economy of Karachi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Miniature

Karachi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Miniature

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Fixed! Thanks for it

Faizan (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)!

February 2013

Hello Faizan Al-Badri, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I don't understand your saying you didn't copy this as you clearly did. You could quote it, attributing it to Hassan Abbas (you'd have to attribute it to him however you used it). I'd advise quoting him as it's such a short bit it's hard to paraphrase. You have to attribute it as it's not something we could state as fact. Dougweller (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

What you mean to say? but it's lock stock and barrel from the source, thus copyvio????????

You mean that I should use totally my words? Faizan (talk) 12:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

See WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE for guidance. You can quote or paraphrase so it doesn't resemble the original, but I'd quote. In any case you need to attribute it to the author. 12:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Dougweller (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nahyan bin Mubarak Al Nahyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miniature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Content requires reliable sources

You have been improperly reinserting content to Aligarh Muslim University without providing the appropriate third party reliable sources that are required before challenge materials can be restored. In addition, even if sourced, the majority of the junk is non encylcopedic promotional crap. Wikipedia is not here to provide a free web host for the university. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

How it is non-encylopedic and promotional material? here Faizan (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

how can a university claiming to have educated heads of state, influential business leaders, famous entertainers NOT be promotional?? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

The University has no need to claim! The Muslim University was part of Aligarh Movement and was founded by great Muslim leader Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. Anyway, I will provide reference for that table, you don't worry! Faizan (talk) 15:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Karachi investment

Do you have a source/confirmation that this investment is indeed disputed? [1] Mar4d (talk) 05:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes! Obviously, here is the link! Check it out here!. Faizan (talk) 11:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, you seem to be right (Abu Dhabi royal scraps agreement for Pakistan real estate project, Dawn News). Lol... happens only in Pakistan. Mar4d (talk) 17:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

It was just a crap! We Pakistanis wasted our time in it, Abu Dhabi Group, I think was not honest with this project, or else Malik Riaz was lying! Well Bro, I wanted to ask yo that how to use an HTML Signature like yours? In Custom Font? I would prefer like this: Faizan! Faizan (talk) 06:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Haha. Actually this is not the first time, it reminds me of the overhyped Mubarak Centre in Lahore that also met a similiar fate. Large projects like these simply face too many constraints in Pakistan for political reasons :( As in regards to your question, you can modify your signature by going to your preferences (or click here: Special:Preferences). Paste your preferred the HTML coding into the box labelled "Signature" and you're done :) Mar4d (talk) 09:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please join the discussion

Please make your case why the encyclopedia is improved by violating the standard WP:SUMMARY style and other policies at Aligarh Muslim University by joining the discussion [[2]]. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

The discussion began between you and me but it has been through the official process been broadened to invite opinions from the wider community. you can participate in that discussion Talk:Aligarh_Muslim_University#Request_for_comment_on_appropriate_summary_style or not as you wish. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

you have been replied to, multiple times, but you refuse to "get it" - the section of the the alumni list that you are cutting and pasting into the University page is NOT a summary of the Alumni page. If you refuse or do not understand basic summarization, my repeatedly writing responses for you to continue to ignore is not going to resolve the situation. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

I am not "beating around the bush" - I am beating a dead horse who either refuses to understand basic summarization or is too dull to understand. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Get to the point! Faizan (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

the point is: a formal request to discuss how to apply Summary Style has been initiated. You have been notified. You can participate or not. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Faizan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mar4d (talk) 05:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure brother! Faizan (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Hope you'll find the source useful for expanding the article. Mar4d (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Urdu Speakers

Wa'Alaikumas'Salam, I have fixed the infobox at Urdu article indicating total number of speakers, 'only Urdu' & 'including Hindi'. Was'Salam --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 07:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Instrument of surrender

Google search the actual copies of the Instrument of Surrender, and you will see how distorted the article is. Let me finish my edits with references.--ArmanJ (talk) 11:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Google search is not correct always, you have to see the reliable sources! That article is reliable! And the Constituion of Pakistan of 1962 originally said "Republic of Pakistan", but after it, due to public protests, it was changed to "Islamic Republic of Pakistan" Faizan (talk) 11:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

What I meant to say was that Google search is full of reliable sources which contradict the previous content. The version given from Story of Pakistan was distorted. The technicalities of the topic are important and sensitive, and its crucial that we get them right.--ArmanJ (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

I didn't see any discussion on the talk page. But I've given my points there, please go and see.--ArmanJ (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Faizan Al-Badri; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure, Thank you! Faizan (talk) 10:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Sialkot

Hello, I read you message on my talk page. I think, it is nice of you to inform me on this. But vickle1777 left a note in the talk page for Sialkot about the relevcance of the information removed. In no uncertain terms, the historians from both British and Muslim backgrounds have termed the Sikh rule as a constructive and open to the welfare of the entire Punjab. So, it is very difficult to conclude that Muslims faced restrictions during the Sikh rule. I have noticed a similar accusition in the page for Kashmir e.g. it says there was a death sentence as punishment for killing a cow. Well, I am sure the reference provided their belongs to a Hindu/Indian author. And for information, cow doesn't hold any specific position in Sikh culture apart from being a milch cattle.

I hope it makes some sense. Or otherwise, if you still believe the Sikh rule was oppressive upon Muslims, so what can be done about it? Of Teacher (talk) 06:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest you to read Punjabi-Poet Shah Mohammad. Of Teacher (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Unfortuantely, the reference you have quoted belongs to an Indian Author and you can imagine it were the Indians who attacked our Sovereign Punjab to enslave it to the British. You must rather trust a Muslim author Shah Mohammad than an Indian viewpoint. This same author has written about the Death punishment, Ban on Namaz, and other things in Kashmir during the Sikh rule. But I hope you know, there was something very typically, during that period that Death Penalty was abolished. And as "Chitralekha zutshi", the author you have quoted said, there was death sentence for killing a cow, i think it goes against the evidence, because neither Sikhs deems cow like Hindus nor their was a death penalty during the Sikh rule. Also, there were Muslim regiments serving the Khalsa which means the Namaz also may not have been banned.... The wikipedia page of Shah Mohammad may give you an insight. But I guess, the Sikh rule having died nearly 160 years ago doesn't matter now. So, even if you don't agree to remove that sentence from Sialkot page it still wont matter. And I will not enter into an edit-war over it. Thank you for writing to me brother... Of Teacher (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh Brother, yes they were responsible for our defeat by the hands of the British. I surely trust Muslim or Sikh references more than Indian references. But the problem is that there is no live reference at Shah Mohammad. Sikh rule has not died, Al-Hamdulillah, The Khalistan movement is on its way. Anyway, thanks for your precious time! Faizan (talk) 12:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Baloch Nationalism

Baloch nationalism stems from lingual roots which is more concentrated in Brohi, Sulemani Makrani and Rukhshani speaking areas of Province Baluchistan. Sindhi (Jadgali Dialect), Saraiki(Khetrani dialect), Dehvari, Pashto, Hazargi and Mix (Punjabi Settlers) belts population dont suppourt Baloch Nationalism which accounts for 50 % of population of Baluchistan Province. So the map puts the background loud and clear for the Baloch nationalism state in Province of Baluchistan. Maria0333 (talk) 08:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Sister! You did not wait for my reply and reverted my edits, which is in-appropriate. Your reason of "AS DISCUSSED WITH FAIZAN AL_BADRI" is also invalid, as the discussion had not ended in consensus. Where the map mentions that in this area of language, Nationalism is more prominent? The map just tells about languages, it does not tell that which ethnicity is more bending towards nationalism, lets discuss it first, then make changes in any of the pages! Faizan (talk) 09:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

So you better add the my above paras in the main article while map will remain along side. Actually people out side Baluchistan think that all Baloch are anti Pakistan but that is not the case in the areas referred above. so map is very very important. Maria0333 (talk) 11:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Ok you give me a reference or link about it, so that I add content wiith image telling the world that not all Balochs are traitors, I am also a Pakistani! You are? Faizan (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Reply:Muhammad in Islam

Wa alaikum Assalam, thank you brother for your interest in the article! Actually the content I shortened was created by myself. Now come to the main point: when I started editing this article, almost no important material or information was there. I started improving this article by providing the biographic information, and created sections from lead to Badr war. but soon realized that this article requires to show what the Muslims think about our great prophet Muhammad (SW). Biographic information, it was suggested on its talk page, was already included in the Muhammad article. Now the main question is what should be the aim and scope of this article. This is the thing we have to agree on on its talk page. Unfortunately now nobody participates in it.

I've decided to shorten the biographic info created by myself as much as possible, and add Muslim perspectives on our Prophet. I request you to put your comments, on its talkpage, on how this article should be. --AsceticRosé ^talk 17:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Faizan. You have new messages at Maria0333's talk page.
Message added 18:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Samar ^Talk 18:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

THANKS

Thanks brother ye hm punjabiyon k dushman haen. hr wqt hm ko tortay haen..ab mea in ko aps mea torungi ta kay aenda kbi PAK zr zameen ko tornay ka na sochen Maria0333 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Faizan. You have new messages at Maria0333's talk page.
Message added 19:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Samar ^Talk 19:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Muhammad bin Qasim

Hello. I removed the comment regarding Pakistan from the article, and really don't think it ought to be added to the lead again. There are several reasons why. Pakistan did not exist, so there were no Pakistanis for many centuries after bin Qasim. Pakistan itself was never thought of as an actual entity until the Partition in the late 1940s. Calling him the first Pakistani is like calling Christopher Columbus the first citizen of the Dominican Republic. Thanks, dci | TALK 14:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Faizan. You have new messages at DCI2026's talk page.
Message added 16:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

dci | TALK 16:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Keep a surveillance on Muhammad in Islam

Hello brother, recently an unknown user named Kabalakhbar is constantly vandalizing this article. Most of the time I remain off-line. If possible, keep a watch on this article! Thanks. AsceticRosé ^talk 17:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure Brother! Faizan (talk) 10:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

hello again

First, apologies for the whole instrument of surrender episode.

Regarding the Caliphate edits, Chittagong was a major port for the Arabs like Canton in China, Cochin in Kerela and the ports of Somalia. If China, and Somalia can be included on that basis, why not Bangladesh?--ArmanJ (talk) 13:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

The founder of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Quaid-e-Azam said that:

“ “Think 100 times before you take a decision, But once that decision is taken, stand by it as one man.” ” — Quaid-e-Azam

And as far as the Umayyad Caliphate is discussed, The countries of China, Somalia, etc should be discussed on the Article's talk, as they are inappropriate. Faizan (talk) 09:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

You're qouting Jinnah? Didn't he say that Pakistan was a mistake?

My edits were constructive and referenced, you should debate before reverting them.

Re the caliphate again, if China, India and Somalia remains, so should Bangladesh. Moreover caliphates aren't only about territorial empires, they're also suppose to cover the entire Muslim ummah. So if Islam was present in parts of China, India, Somalia and Bengal during the Umayyad Caliphate, then they should be included.--ArmanJ (talk) 02:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

What nonsense you are talking about The great leader? When he said that The Islamic Republic of Pakistan was a mistake?? You now have to provide reference for this blasphemy! Reply now, or accept your mistake and ask for forgiveness! Did I talk like that about your Sheikhs?

And I already told you that discuss those countries which have been wrongly inserted in the caliphate's infobox at the Article's Talk!, and if consensus is reached there, you are eligible to remove China, India, Somalia, etc. Hope you got it! Faizan (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Several Pakistani historians have spoken about how Jinnah regretted the violence and chaos of partition, especially in the book The Sole Spokesman by Ayesha Jalal. And more importantly, today's pakistan is not jinnah's pakistan since he wanted democracy and separation between politics and religion.

And you yourself have no respect for Wikipedia:PA do you? You're accusations of "blasphemy" constitute personal attack. So did your previous comments like "use english" and "dont use native language", which were highly uncalled for since my edits were referenced and more neutral.--ArmanJ (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

When I said use english" and "dont use native language"?

Which Pakistani Historians you are talking about? They may be bangladeshi or indian historians! And First of all! Was Jinah Responsible for violence and chaos of partition? Did he told hindus to kill Muslims migrating to West and East Pakistan? Don't talk such crap again! Really I was amazed at this, if he had not made Pakistan, then your Bangladesh had not been independent! GOT IT? Your forefathers of East Pakistan loved him, but now.......... Go and study your Sheikhs first, and you will meet the reality! And as far as Wikipedia:PA is concerned, it deals with "Comment on content, not on the contributor.", My comment about blasphemy was clearly about your crap not about you. Faizan (talk) 07:19, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

You of all people do not have to teach me history. Your comments at the edit logs of Instrument of Surrender (1971), "don't use native words, use english" was a personal attack.

My comments were not any criticism of Jinnah. In response to your quotation nonsense, I was simply pointing out what a Pakistani historian Ayesha Jalal said, that apparently Pakistan in the 1947 form was an accident. The Lahore Resolution originally called for two states in east and west, not one state. My forefathers took part in the Pakistan movement, but they also protested Jinnah's speech in Dhaka in January 1948 when he refused to make Bengali a state language despite it being the language of the majority. Pakistan would not have been born without Bengalis!

Do more study at Wikipedia:PA! And Remember that even if you try to censure Jinnah or any other respectable leader, you cannot tarnish him! Anyway, now we should leave it! Our countries are different but we both are Muslims first of all and then Pakistani, or Bangladeshi. Isn't it?Faizan (talk) 12:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Update the image at Instrument of Surrender (1971) with the correct licence, it has been deleted! Faizan (talk) 12:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Just thought I'd point out; Muhammad 'Ali Jinnah, Quaid-e-Azam was not the founder of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (although of course he did found Pakistan itself), which was founded in 1956, 8 years after his death. Of course, he had a great part to play in inspiring and laying a foundation for the later Islamic Republic, but he himself was Governor-General of the Dominion of Pakistan from independence in 1947 to his death in 1948. Constitutionally, he was the representative of the King of Pakistan at the time, George VI.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 13:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Whatever he maybe, the people of The Islamic Republic of Pakistan love their Fist Governor General and Founder of Pakistan. Constitutionally only, he may be the representative of the King George VI, but by heart, he was a representative of the people of Pakistan! He was at the same time the founder and first governor general of Pakistan, and you know that is possible! Faizan (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Read these references also! 1 and 2 Hope you got it! Faizan (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Next time keep your nonsense out of my talk page. Ghadaar Maria0333 (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

What? This is personal attack, you are clearly violating WP:PA, please go through it! Faizan (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk Page Revert

You should not have reverted Maria0333's blanking of her talk page. She is permitted to do that and it is taken as an acknowledgement that she has read the content that she removed. - Sitush (talk) 15:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

So should I revert my edit? Faizan (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I have reverted mine edits! Thanks! Faizan (talk) 15:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

She blanked the entire page herself. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 15:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC))

Yeah! She removed your comments too Lowkeyvision! Faizan (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Well she reserves rights over her talk page. We have nothing to do with it. Faizan (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

HAHAHA :) Yep! (Lowkeyvision (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC))

And she's now blocked! Faizan (talk) 15:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

How did you get that? (Lowkeyvision (talk) 15:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC))

Watchlist! Faizan (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

How do you see that?(Lowkeyvision (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC))

lol! what you want to ask? Faizan (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Nvm. I found the block list. Man that sucks for her. I really think Wikipedia has this antagonist view towards new editors. I think just to survive you have to have thick skin. I think that is the explanation why 95% of editors are dudes. And then you throw dudes into an online website with anonymity and you get stupid stuff like this. I hope she learns from this but doesn't quit. (Lowkeyvision (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC))

Yes hope the same for her! Faizan (talk) 09:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Lowkeyvision, the longer someone has been here, the thicker their skin often needs to be. I've had death threats and all sorts of rubbish from newcomers who simply refuse to understand that we have policies etc. You'll never see that sort of behaviour from an experienced user. Fortunately, experience tends to thicken the skin anyway. If it didn't, I would have reported you some time ago. - Sitush (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

IP:39.47.79.63

I am on internet cafe. Block kr do Faizan uncle. Kal kisi or net cafe ko bi close krwa dena. City me 10,000 internet Cafe hain ha ha ha 39.47.79.63 (talk) 13:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

(Translation) I am on internet cafe, Block me but there are 10,000 cafes in the city! Do close other internet cafes in the city too later! Translation by Faizan (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure Maria! Faizan (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Pseudoephedrine

The changes you reverted of mine were me reverting somebody else's changes where they added a one line "use to make methamphetamine" section with no punctuation or capitalization and also pasted the same line under the existing "Sports" section as a sentence fragment. The changes were clearly below the min-bar quality level I expect from Wikipedia. I'd recommend putting my changes back. 204.14.159.137 (talk) 16:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

 The un-referenced text there has been removed! Thanks! Faizan (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

39th Century

Hey, You keep putting the birth of Seth as being in 3874, but according to the Torah, the universe and this Adam and Eve were not created until 3761. Seth could not have been born before his parents were made, so the date given is not possible according to Judaism. Thus the source for the 3874 date is either wrong or it is a non-Jewish source, in which case, cite it and link to the proper article, as it is part of a different tradition of biblical exogenisis. (Which is an article I'd want to read.) I'm going to remove the date again, for the reasons above given.

Besides the factual inconsistency, the real issue here is sourcing. I don't care that there are differences of opinion, but I want to see where those ideas come from, not so I can discount them, but because I want to know the history of thought on the subject. Clearly we've stumbled upon area of exogenisis with different traditions, so lets explore where this difference comes from. All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.142.109 (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

The Warren School

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Warren School. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I am really sorry for it! Faizan (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Faizan. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Saraiki language

Dear, Saraiki is a language, it is not a dialect. Riasti dialect, Shah puri dialect,Multani dialect, Multani language, Thalochi dialect, Thalochi ,Derawali dialect articles. I suggest merging these articles , as the all these are same. And also be Redirected to Saraiki language. Also Jhangvi dialect is dialect of Saraiki. Kindly See these External Links #1 and #2.

• Department of Saraiki, Islamia University, Bahawalpur was established in 1989 and Department of Saraiki, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan was established in 2006. Saraiki is taught as subject in schools and colleges at higher secondary, intermediate and degree level. Allama Iqbal open university Islamabad, and Al-Khair university Bhimbir have their Pakistani Linguistics Departments. They are offering M.Phil. and Ph.D in Saraiki. Five TV channels and Ten Radio Stations are Serving Saraiki language. Saraiki is taught as compulsory subject in Dera Ismaeel khan and Tank.182.186.47.188 (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan

Hi, I'm in discussion at User talk:The Rambling Man#Wikipedia:Today's featured list/April 22, 2013, please have your opinion there. Zia Khan 19:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maria0333, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Faizan (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Sir, What is this ? Please Explain it to me.

Kindly block him 182.186.68.81 (talk) 13:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Dominion of Pakistan

Hello Faizan; I hope you are well :)

-What you stated on my talk page is incorrect. There is absolutely no constitutional difference between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1956-1971 and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1971-the present day, it just happens that 1956-1971, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan included East Pakistan, whereas know it does not. There was no such constitutional entity as 'Pakistan(United)', this was an informal designation that did not officially exist.

East Pakistan and West Pakistan were merely Provinces of Pakistan; they were not sovereign states in their own right, and thus should not be listed as successor states.

Furthermore, Pakistan became a republic in 1956, but the provinces of East Pakistan and West Pakistan were created in 1955. So that means that East Pakistan and West Pakistan could not possibly succeed the Dominion of Pakistan because not only did they exist whilst Pakistan was still a monarchy and dominion, they were parts of it.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 13:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done Well I agree with your points, I have replaced the Successor state with Pakistan, and in the infobox I have added "Today part of" with Bangladesh and Pakistan! Faizan (talk) 13:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar!

Thank you brother for your recognition! --AsceticRosé ^talk 15:04, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Oh Brother don't mention it! Thats ok, Just keep up the good work! Faizan (talk) 06:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Help request

Hi Faizan. I saw your contributions and they look good, so I need your help to watch these articles. Would you please?:

• Delhi Sultanate, Great Seljuq Empire, Ghaznavids, Timurid dynasty, Khilji dynasty, Tughlaq dynasty, Mamluk Sultanate (Delhi), Kara-Khanid Khanate

Thanks. Zheek (talk) 17:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Yeah Zheek, vandalism is really a problem in these articles, I was watching a few of them already, but now I have added all of them to my Watchlist, Anyway, Thanks! Faizan (talk) 06:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Great. Zheek (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

request for talk-page participation

please participate here of Muhammad in Islam article. --AsceticRosé ^talk 03:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Farooq Umar

I'm not involved on BLP or other Biography articles very much. Most of my edits on Biography articles are minor. Your article is at a good state, but add 2-3 more sources (at least). You can improve it by comparing to the similar articles. Add necessary sections and relevant templates. Also use "ref name" feature for the parts with the content from same source. More details for your sources (using cite web/cite template) and etc. Anyway, I will watch it. Zheek (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

E.G. this is not a good cite: [3]. Use a specific link or page from this website. Another suggestion is Google Books. It's very helpful. Also I recommend using "archiveurl" feature for your sources. I will add one and write the diff on here. Zheek (talk) 09:09, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

WebCite is currently down and I can't access it, your can learn about it and "archiveurl" on Using WebCite. Not necessary for all of sources but it's a good way to prevent future link rot/dead links. Zheek (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Added archiveurl for 2 of your sources. See this diff. Zheek (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

participation request

Hello brother, about Muhammad in Islam, a similar discussion is going on. Your participation is expected. Check here . (I proposed that the texts in section “Notable early events” should come under sub-sections like “orphanhood: a divine plan”, “God’s protection”, “early sign of Prophethood” etc. But another user (User_talk:Kiatdd) told they look like POV. Check this also for a complete understanding) --AsceticRosé ^talk 11:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

clarification about recent reverting

Dear Faizan brother, it seems that there was a misunderstanding about the moving of content. Actually a new Opposition section will be created, but there is already a section named "Opposition and persecution". That's why, first we need to remove the in-between biographic info, and then carefully move the sub-sections with some amendments, and not before that, to avoid confusion. I've reverted recent edit and hope you will not misunderstand me. I'll do that manually.
It is me who created biographic-releted mess, and perhaps it is me who now have to clean all those carefully. And for further improvement, I must need your help. Hope, you will be with me for the sake of our beloved prophet-related important article. And thanks for talk-page participations. That helped a lot. --AsceticRosé ^talk 17:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Faizan Al-Badri. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! INeverCry 19:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia User Scripts

See WP:JS and read my comment on my talk page. Zheek (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

Hello, there is currently a discussion at AN [4] about a disruptive IP editor with whom you have been involved.Jeppiz (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Mukti Bahini

Dear Faizan Al-Badri, You have put only Pakistani view and info on this article. It does not support WP:NPOV. As many of Mukti Bahini members are alive now, it is also WP:BLP vio. You are emphasizing on Bihari issue, but never put a word about Pak army's mass killing. Most of your reference are non-accessible or circularly quoting R.J. Rummel. Please provide me the text, which actually those reference says, as I can verify them. Untill then, I am reverting your edits. Thank you.--FreemesM ^(talk) 11:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear Freemesm! You notified me on my talk about [[Mukti Bahini, The figures that I added there were not violating WP:NPOV, It cannot be Wikipedia:BLP, as we are not talking about living militants, we are talking about the organization of those militants. If you want to discuss it more, do it at the already active discussion at Article's talk, instead of my talk.Faizan (talk) 12:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

As the discussion is in progress, don't revert my edits again. Faizan (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mukti Bahini. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Better reply me at the talk! Faizan (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Faizan Al-Badri, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison to other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and TheStrikeΣagle 05:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Islamic Green

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Islamic Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. FreemesM ^(talk) 07:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

This article does not contain any citation and I think it has no other significance to have a separate article. I know green is color of Islam, but I don't ever hear about the term "Islamic Green" as well. I'm requesting its seedy deletion.--FreemesM ^(talk) 07:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I have contested, now put your arguments there! Faizan (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Have a look!

Dear brother, have a look at Muhammad in Islam article. I've arranged Opposition section as discussed in the article's talk page, and more! --AsceticRosé ^talk 09:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk page participation request

As you advised, I've moved the discussion on sub-section naming of the section Muhammad_in_Islam#Early_years to the article's talk page. Your participation is expected. --AsceticRosé ^talk 09:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Brother, you haven't yet participated at talk-page of Muhammad in Islam article. Please, participate here... --AsceticRosé ^talk 11:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Islamic Green for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 09:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Faizan. You have new messages at MelbourneStar's talk page.
Message added 09:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

+1 message —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

"Secondary language in the City of Karachi" ref needed

Just seen that you have reverted a sentence of another user, in Bengali language article, which says "It is also a recognized secondary language in the City of Karachi in Pakistan.". As a Bengali, I don't ever hear about that, my be my lack of knowledge. Could you please provide the reference? Please enlighten me.--FreemesM ^(talk) 07:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I am adding reference to it, wait. Faizan (talk) 07:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Faizan, thanks for your quick response. But DEMOTIX is not a reliable source it is "The Network for Freelance Photojournalists". Another one is bbc Urdu link, sorry to say I can't read Urdu. could you please help me to search another English reference or translate the specific part of the BBC news, which supports your statement?--FreemesM ^(talk) 07:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure! You can translate the BBC Urdu page online, Anyway I will add more references to it to facilitate you! Faizan (talk) 07:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

It will be better if we continue our talk on article talk page. Thank you.--FreemesM ^(talk) 08:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I am astonished

Mr Faizan, I am on wikipedia since 2006. I started W.Punjabi WIkipedia, W.Punjabi Wiktionary, W.Punjabi Wikiquotes and I am on W.Commons I am admn at one. I made the map of Punjabi dialects[File:Dialects Of Punjabi.jpg], and this User:Maria0333, in a wrong way changed the map. She is banned now, and I rectified her and pasted the corrwct map. I am really enjoying your comments that I am maria0333. Edit wars are simply waste of time and I dont have have enough time. I request you please delete your message from my page and please think again how I can be maria0333 ? It is a mistake.--Khalid Mahmood (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes I read your message at James' talk regarding your reservations that she stole your image and edited it to add in many articles. Mahmood Sahab! This image is of low quality, it really needs update, please update it and then add it in articles, and please don't add it in unrelated articles. Secondly you have permissions and rights of your talk page, and you can remove my messages! And if you are not a sock puppet, then obviously check user evidence will declare you innocent! You need not to worry about that, and I am sorry for my apparent mistake! Regards! Faizan (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Mr Faizan, before uploading this map it was thoroughly checked and sent to many forums for rectification and than I uploaded here. I know Punjab like my palm and I did exhaustive work you cannot imagine. Immediately there is no need of rectification. She/maria etc did wrong, I just corrected where I found she did wrong. And before opening a court here you should check the facts. You wrote on my page without any thinking now it is your duty to clean that. I will delete from your page. By the way what is your age and qualification ? See some of my images on commons [[5]]. Well, have a nice day.--Khalid Mahmood (talk) 06:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

There is a need of rectification! That image should be remade with the same content but with high resolution, secondly remove it from unrelated pages. My age and qualification has nothing to do with the image, and thanks for the good wish. I already told that I have no rights for your talk, and you can remove my messages. All the best for updating the image! Faizan (talk) 06:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

مینوں تسیں ادھا لہوری کہ سکدے او پر میں ایتھے اسلاماباد وج ریندا واں پر لہور وج کسے نوں کہ کے فوٹو بنوا لنیا واں۔ میں صرف اوتھے مورتاں لایآں جتھے ماریہ نے اپنا نقشہ پایا سی تے مینوں لگ ریا سی جے اوہنے کئی تھانواں تے ایویں ای پادتیاں نیں۔ شکریہ۔ --Khalid Mahmood (talk) 07:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Chakwal

My Dear Faizan, i posted only the about Chakwal city. if you seemed that is inappropriate post, so kindly remove links those are also there. then why you have problem with my post ? i need answer!

Regards Ijaz

References
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
References 1. ^ Location of Chakwal – Falling Rain Genomics 2. ^ District Gazeteer of Jhelum 1904 – Ibbetson, D.: "Punjab settlement report", page 87. Punjab Government Press, 1862 3. ^ The International year book and statesmen's who's who. Kelly's Directories, Brill Academic Publishers. 1953. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 4. ^ Pakistan tourism directory. Holiday Weekly. 1992. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 5. ^ Rosen, C. (29 November 2000). World resources 2000–2001: people and ecosystems : the fraying web of life. United Nations Development Programme, Elsevier. p. 184. ISBN 978-0-08-043781-1. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 6. ^ Ibbeyson, D: "Punjab settlement report", page 88. Punjab Government Press, 1862 7. ^ [Gazetteer of the Jhelum District,1904,Page70] 8. ^ Mutiny Report, Punjab Govt. Record, Page386 9. ^ Chakwal-Fondly Remembered 10. ^ Butt, Usama (16 September 2010). Pakistan's Quagmire: Security, Strategy, and the Future of the Islamic-Nuclear Nation. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 239. ISBN 978-0-8264-3300-8. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 11. ^ "Deadly blast in Pakistani mosque". Al Jazeera. 5 April 2009. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 2009-04-05. 12. ^ Adamson, Hilary; Shaw, Isobel (1981). A traveller's guide to Pakistan. Asian Study Group. Retrieved 17 July 2011. 13. ^ Tehsils & Unions in the District of Chakwal – Government of Pakistan 14. ^ http://www.chakwal.edu.pk/ 15. ^ http://www.dhudialnews.com 16. ^ http://www.dhudialnama.com/ 17. ^ http://www.voiceofchakwal.com/ 18. ^ http://www.dailychakwalnama.com/ 19. ^ http://www.dhudial2day.com/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazipk99 (talk • contribs) 07:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

These references are not Advertisements, but dear Ijaz, the clasiifield website cannot be added in an encyclopedia. Please read my message on your talk! Faizan (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

OK DO ONE THING ACCORDING YOUR THINKING IT WAS AN APPROPRIATED POST. SO PLEASE REMOVE THAT LIST AS WELL.

IF YOU DON'T ACCEPT THE IMAGES AND EXTERNAL LINK. THEN MENTION ONLY THE WEBSITE NAME: http://www.mychakwal.com IN THE SAME LIST.. I DON'T TRYING TO ADVERTISEMENT ON THE WIKIPEDIA. BUT NEED TO SHOW THEM OF CHAKWALIAN CITIZENS. THAT IS PART OF THOSE CITIZENS.

1. ^ http://www.dhudialnews.com 2. ^ http://www.dhudialnama.com/ 3. ^ http://www.voiceofchakwal.com/ 4. ^ http://www.dailychakwalnama.com/ 5. ^ http://www.dhudial2day.com/

REGARDS IJAZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazipk99 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I will see these references, and if they are personal links/advertisements, then they will be removed, secondly this is not my personal thinking, its according to Wikipedia's rules and regulations, you can have a look at WP:EL. Faizan (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done The Personal Links which violate WP:EL have been removed, Thanks for pointing these links! Faizan (talk) 11:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Sources

We don't use self-published blogs for citations. They potray a hardly fourth generation aircraft as a twenty first generation aircraft with extraordinary capabilities. Get some other reliable sources(NOT BLOGS) if you want the re-add the info. Please get some non-pakistani reference. That would be much better. TheStrikeΣagle 12:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I have not added citations to blogs, and all of them are reliable, discuss them at Article's talk. Faizan (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

This is also a blog? lol! Faizan (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Decent attempt for a pun on me but it is rather a failure. Notice the header of every post, it says by admin..... News Agencies and official websites DONT HAVE ADMINS. Bad Attempt...once again :) TheStrikeΣagle 13:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh lol! Who will pun you? :D Anyway, thanks for removing that reference from admins, I will search for an admin-free web citation. Faizan (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Kindergarten

Hello, I'm Psychonaut. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kindergarten because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Psychonaut (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

That was not deliberate, thanks for your revert! Faizan (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Colorado Time Systems

Dear Faizan, I edited the Colorado Time Systems page to remove personal reference to Anita Sayed as the comments are inaccurate and defamatory. Secondly, the partnerships listed are not accurate. Straighttime (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)straighttime

The content you removed was referenced, secondly you did not provide a reason in the edit summary! So if you think that the content is inaccurate, then please discuss it a the article's talk. Faizan (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Faizan, I did put a reason in the edit summary? I agree that the partnerships were referenced, but they have since expired. I still stand by my assertion that defamatory remarks should be removed regarding Ms. Sayed. I am new to this, and really want the page to be an accurate reflection of the company and do not believe that personal attacks on the staff should be allowed. Any advise would be greatly appreciated. Straighttime (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thankyou very much for the welcome. I appreciate it. Love4pakistan (talk) 14:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. User:MiszaBot III (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Beeblebrox (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Faizan (talk) 17:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I will try to do justice! Faizan (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Correction for John Fleming Congressman

You are insisting on something that is completely untrue on the John Fleming Congress page. His district is 2:1 Democratic though his Cook PVI rating is R+11. Please remain with the corrections. http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Louisiana's_4th_congressional_district_elections,_2012 Joapedia (talk) 14:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

That was jumbled up English, it ought to have improvement! Faizan (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Lazy Town Episode Change

Yes I did make a mistake but then went back to change it. Thank you for trying to help, because I might have just left it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.189.144.212 (talk) 15:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Edits on "Come Undone" - Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated

Thank you for your politeness; however, I believe that everyone should know that everything was as its opposite in the new Crystal Cove on the alternate timeline. Instead of listing every single difference, just say that everything is as its opposite, which includes characters who died before are alive once more.

I'm assuming that you've seen the final episode, so you saw how it was. Brad and Judy were always Fred's parents, the Blakes approve of Daphne's relationship with Fred now and her sisters aren't overachievers anymore, Cassidy Williams and Ricky Owens are married and are owners of Creationex, the new version of Destroido, and Pericles serves as a promotional icon and lives with Cassidy and Ricky. Not to mention that Ricky is way more robust and muscular with his body structure.

There are much more changes, but I believe that everyone has a right to know that everything was different in the new Crystal Cove. Thanks, and please take it into consideration! --ScoobyDooIsAmazing (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Argentine General Election

This article is trying to be split to match interwiki articles, he put in alot of effort in making all the content stay intact. Please don't revert him ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 15:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit

		The Pakistani Barnstar of National Merit
		Awarded to you for your extensive efforts and contributions to Pakistan-related articles. I guess you needed some recognition. You're first barnstar, eh? Mar4d (talk) 07:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Ah yes the first barnstar! Thank you very much Mar4d, it's a pleasure! Faizan (talk) 07:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

It's always a pleasure to be the first one to give a barnstar to a well-deserving and hard-working editor :) Mar4d (talk) 07:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I have no words, So happy to get recognition by seniors! Faizan (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Mehnat ka phal meetha hota hai :) Keep up the good work. Hope to see some good collaborations with you in the future. Mar4d (talk) 07:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Btw, was just going over your contributions and you seem to be making edits in the hundreds daily. Are you a human or a robot? :D Mar4d (talk) 07:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes In Sha Allah, our foremost responsibility is to serve the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, and we will be collaborating to serve it In Sha Allah, and I use tools like Huggle. and STiki and revert vandalism, that's why they are in hundreds, Mar4d! Thanks again! Faizan (talk) 07:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Haha, fair enough. You do nevertheless seem to be an avid Wikiholic :D Just a tip though if you won't mind: Beware of Wikiholism. Once you're in, there's no returning back, haha. Don't let wikiholism get out of control and take it too much over your life. Especially if you're a student, you'll know what I mean. I've been down that road before so I know what I'm talking about At one point, I used to spend nearly most of my day on Wiki. I've now toned it down a bit to have some more balance and will admit that I don't edit as crazily as I used to before. Mar4d (talk) 07:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hahahaaaa, well, it's a common problem of the Wikipedians! Do you know, I have HSSC-I Pre-Medical FBISE exams on the 14 of the next month! But I am also getting addicted to Wikipedia, lol, I also spend most of the time here. It's really an unavoidable addiction na? Faizan (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Lol! I had a friend, User:TopGun, who also started off as a newbie editor and then became a Wikiholic. He once went on a 24-hour round! Surely, you're not reaching that point yet? :D Tip of the day: balance Wiki with studies. Else you're screwed Mar4d (talk) 07:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Teaming up? eh Mar4d? TheStrikeΣagle 07:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes teaming up! eh. Just 100 more edits, then I am going to follow your tip Mar4d! Faizan (talk) 07:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Lol. Mar4d (talk)

rv

you need to revert your mistake-mistake. changing policy is not allowed w/o consensus. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:29, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

 Done, Already! Faizan (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

No. The last revert was the mistake. Deleting essential content from active policy is vandalism. Re-instating is also vandalism. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

You have many options, discuss it at the talk, and then if you get consensus, then you can paste the text discussed. Faizan (talk) 07:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

OK. I'm assuming you stand by your vandalism. Do I have to give you the formal warning template? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

This assuming does not work here! Better discuss it at the talk, and that's it! Faizan (talk) 07:41, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

The part in question has been in there since at least 2010. Removing it without discussion is vandalism. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

If you think that I did a mistake, then you are eligible to restore the text which was there since 2010, I had already reverted my edits, now I have nothing to do with it, and I request you to restore the text! Faizan (talk) 07:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

OK. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 07:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Sorry about that. I was trying to type, but I accidently deleted it. Thanks for understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.100.91 (talk) 08:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Damascus

Gday Faizan

Mate when you say you undid several of my contributions as they didnt seem constructive. Constructive for who do you mean exactly..? As my contributions altered some clear falasies regarding the ongoinging international assault on Syria. That is not a civil war as you have stated, but a war on Syrians by wahabi extremists mercenaries, attempting to destablise the last secular arab state in the middle east. and you make no mention of the numerous police and security personel and civilians killed by snipers and provocatuers, during the initial protests, that led to the violent crasck down by the syrian police in the early protests.. also you neglect to mention the much larger repeated pro-government rallies all over the country one such rally that had an exess of 2 million people. nor do you mention the refurendum held in 2011 that reiterated majority support for president assad. instead your subversion of the truth serves to mislead people into agreeing with the U.S/N.A.T.O, Narative, on the crisis. and your undoing my contribution is only constructive for the vested interests bent on maintaining the lies that justify their aborant agenda, very disapointed in your choice of alegience my misguided friend.

Sincerely Mick mcLennan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.18.72 (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Mick! First of all there is nothing as such "Wahabis", they are all Muslims, and I think that Assad will have to go to home! If some Pro-government rallies were held, then you can add info about them with references but you should not remove info about Anti-government rallies! We are only aligned to Wikipedia's policies, neither to Assad nor the Fighters! If you have references in support of your arguments, then only you can add them! Faizan (talk) 08:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching Airplane olive, stupid Huggle reverted both edits when I told it to only do one. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 14:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome. Faizan (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Bam Aquino

Hello,

I'd like to ask how exactly my 'contribution' is nonconstructive? The page seems to be written like an advertisement, wherein some sections needs to changed and even deleted. The trivia section, for one, is uncalled-for. What is the need for such section? It is redundant and unhelpful. 203.87.176.19 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding the trivia section. It is redundant and unnecessary. Also, I cannot be blocked simply just because we are disagreeing on a content, as per Wikipedia's policy. If I ever get blocked, I can always raise the issue to other administrators to undo it. You can also get blocked for not adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines, so please stop adding the trivia section already. Thank you. 203.87.176.19 (talk) 18:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

User:Dancer ganesh

I proposed this article for deletion, the only content on the page is personal information and the IP was attempting to blank the information out. As such for now I reverted your reversion and tagged it with WP:CSD. <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 08:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

These IP's should write something in edit summaries. Anyway, tagging someone's userpage with WP:CSD is not correct, you ought to had removed the personal info only, anyway thanks! Faizan (talk) 08:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

No...user pages can be tagged for CSD..if they are promotional in nature. TheStrikeΣagle 15:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Zahid Qurban Alvi

You sure he's Sindhi? This is with regards to your addition of Category:Sindhi people in the article. I think unless if there is a source specifically saying he's Sindhi, we should not add any ethnic categories. He might as well be Urdu-speaking, in which case the current category would be inaccurate. Mar4d (talk) 13:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I forgot that point, I have removed the category, thanks for the help! Faizan (talk) 13:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Lol, your talk page is one heck of a busy place isn't it? :D Mar4d (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hahaha...... it's...:D! Faizan (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

I am looking for this MiszaBotIII, where it's? Talk needs archiving. :D Faizan (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Lakerda

This food is also Byzantine... --141.237.203.160 (talk) 14:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Any reference please? Faizan (talk) 14:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

This is very well known - any reference about the ...ottoman origin? --141.237.203.160 (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

You want to add info about Byzantine, right? There is nothing to do with the Ottomans, they have been added before, please search for reliable references! Faizan (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Changes to battle of Culloden

Dear Faizan--

The article on Culloden is a very biased one probably written by an Englishman and inaccurate in several places. The bit I took out was about desertion of Highland troops being caused by having been forced to fight. This is no more true about Culloden than any other battles clansmen fought. All clansmen owed service to their chief and accepted that as right. Desertion was caused by the fact that it had been a campaign of almost a year already and it was spring and the men were needed at home to plant their crops. The 'deserters' were mostly all locals, who were going home to do the plowing. There is no reference back up to the claim of Highlanders being forced to fight and the Highlands were NEVER feudal. Every clansman was free.

I intend to flag up the whole article actually for bias and inaccuracy.

I'm sure you are very knowledgeable about your own country, but this article is about mine. My ancestor led the first charge (on the Jacobit side) at the battle of Culloden...

Bridget MacGillivray — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.65.199 (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

That info was referenced, secondly plz write something in the edit summaries too! Faizan (talk) 15:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Mughal Empire

Hi Faizan, it is common knowledge that founders of Mughal Empire was great grand children of Timur who was founder of Timurid dynasty Timur means 'iron' in Turkic languages, ruling dynasty spoke Turkic Chagatay dialect. Also word Urdu means 'army' in Turkic languages, hence 'Urdu' ca means 'tongue of [ruling] Army'.

Please restore my edition of article Mughal Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismet11 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You removed some content about Gengis Khan, I just restored it, do you have some references in support of your argument? I will restore them if sufficient evidence is there. Faizan (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I have done some minor changes, please add reference for your text. Faizan (talk) 10:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Do you need evidence of Timur being Turkic? or that of his great-grandchildren are founders of Mughal Empire?

in either case, a little internet search will give you plenty of university papers.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/596358/Timur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismet11 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't need, the article needs it! Put the reference you've got in the article, not here! Faizan (talk) 11:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Bangladesh

Does it say on the Pakistan and India articles that independence was from the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"? Or does it say on the Algeria article that independence was from the French Republic? The common standard on wikipedia is to refer to the name of the country, not its full name.

And Islam has a special status in Bangladesh's constitution, although the political system is secular.--ChaudhryAzan (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

It does not have any status in Bangladesh, you have any references? Muslims are being killed there, come to the point, What problem you have with The Islamic Republic of Pakistan? Faizan (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Don't you remember the motto of your country? It is "nationalism, secularism, socialism and democracy" Faizan (talk) 11:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Muslims are being killed there? You're one of those nasty religious chauvinists aren't you? Your brothers are killing real Muslims in Bangladesh just as the Paki army murdered millions of Muslims in 1971.

The Bangladesh constitution gives official recognition to Islam although there is a firm separation between religion and politics. [6]. --ChaudhryAzan (talk) 11:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Note: Please refrain from personal attacks on other editors, comment on content and issues, not individual editors :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 11:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Azan, come to the point please! Don't remove the Islamic Republic from Independence section, or if you want to, then present your arguments. Faizan (talk) 11:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You want to depict Bangladesh as an anti-Islamic state and hence your edits are notoriously biased. Simple as that.--ChaudhryAzan (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Azan, already stated that religion has nothing to do with independence, don't beat about the bush! Faizan (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Exactly, so your edits are even more irrelevant.--ChaudhryAzan (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Sudbury Valley School / Sudbury model / List of Sudbury Schools

Dear Faizan,

First, thank you for your time and attention. I presume that some of the changes I have done to the Sudbury Valley School web page were undone not by you, but by a bot you maintain, and so understand if -- as you say on your talk page -- that your ability to respond is delayed due to exams.

Deleting mistaken or outdated information is not un-constructive. If you have a bot roaming certain pages preventing inaccurate information from being deleted, how can those of us trying to correct mis-information do so and have it "stuck?" I expect that you have weighed this problem, and have a reasoned solution; I look forward to hearing it.

Likewise, another edit of mine, undone by your bot, was an effort to put information under the correct heading. To wit, moving the phrase "Students are given complete responsibility for their own education" from the "Government" section to the "Curriculum" section.

At least one of your bot's edits was helpful. A reference to a Facebook page was put under the wrong header, and I am glad that was caught.

Thank you, Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diodotus (talk • contribs) 14:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)