User talk:Fanblade81

Proposed deletion of Barretto family

The article Barretto family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability and lack of content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Pulang Araw did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Moving pages

It's a lot simpler than you think. We don't want to do moves by copying and pasting, because that would break the page's edit history, but you also don't need an administrator to do the move for you unless the page has actually been move-protected due to vandalism or whatever.

You should see a "Tools" menu on the right-hand side of the page, and one of the links under it is "move". So while you're on the page whose title you want to change, click "move", and you'll be taken to a page that will ask you what you want the new title to be. So you insert the new title there and then hit the move button. Bearcat (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

oh, i did not know. Thank you so much Bearcat, your help is greatly appreciated! Fanblade81 (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Alden Richards

I've placed it under semi-protection for one week to start; we can't jump to permanent protection right off the bat, but we can start small and apply longer terms at later dates if the problem continues. So if it starts up again when the current one-week period expires, we can put it back under protection for longer. Bearcat (talk) 14:46, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. Thank you so much @Bearcat. Fanblade81 (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:List of concert and performances of Filipino artist

A tag has been placed on Category:List of concert and performances of Filipino artist indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

no, worries. you can delete it @Liz its empty. thanks! Fanblade81 (talk) 09:19, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Legaspi family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legaspi family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legaspi family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Moriwen (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

okay, thanks for the head-ups @Moriwen. I will take part in the discussion. Fanblade81 (talk) 18:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Santiago family

The article Santiago family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's standards for notability and lack of content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck Hi, there

where is the link for the proposed consensus for other editors to vote? Kindly advice. Fanblade81 (talk) 09:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Howard the Duck,

I don't know how to improve the page, i just follow the same guidelines for other showbiz families in the Philippines. I can try to find other sources or by adding references to it, but it might take time because they were actors and director back in 1950-1980s and late mid 1995, references might be scarce.

example for

Santiago family - Cielito Santiago was an actress, her husband Pablo Santiago was an actor but also director and producer and directed many of Fernando Poe Jr. movies. Pablo Santiago has a tagalog wikipedia version but does not have the English version yet. I can create and make an English version.

Barretto family - i need more time to find references.

Thank you Fanblade81 (talk) 09:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

If you oppose the proposed deletion, you can remove it. I, of course, will have the option to bring to WP:AFD. Please thoroughly read and understand WP:GNG on what makes a subject notable here. Howard the Duck (talk) 09:44, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck okay, thanks for the link. I will read it through it. If i have questions, i'm going to approach you. Thanks a lot! Fanblade81 (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Hello, I'm Arcrev1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Angelica Panganiban, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arcrev1 (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@Arcrev1 Hi, thanks for the notice. I know but I will eventually add citation later. I tried to add the reference earlier but it did not give me option. I'm using my mobile phone to edit, instead of my laptop. No worries I know the rules, I will add it. Thanks Fanblade81 (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@Fanblade81: Thanks for responding. I know you're aware of the policy, so I just wondered why you didn’t add a source. You said there was no option—do you mean you didn’t know how to add references using source edit on mobile? If so, I can help you with that. - Arcrev1 (talk) 04:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@Arcrev1 I have to admit, it's very challenging on how to navigate Wikipedia and editing using mobile phone, than a laptop.

If you go back to Panganiban page, I reverted it back and added reference to it.

Thanks for helping me, I appreciated it. If I have any question, I will ask you or drop by on your talk page. Other editors have been very helpful and they give me advices too. Fanblade81 (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Dingdong Dantes filmography

You might want to present the filmography section in paragraph form instead, including only the series and films where he played lead roles, received awards, or made significant contributions to the program. Referring to it as a "selected filmography" makes it seem like you simply listed titles without a clear basis. You may refer to the Wikipedia article on Liza Soberano as an example. Thank you. - Arcrev1 (talk) 09:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice @Arcrev1. I did check Liza Soberano page but they mixed her awards with her filmography on a paragraph form.

I used the same pattern on the "Selective Filmography" used from Daniel Padilla page to Dingdong Dantes page. Mr. Dantes has a long list of films and TV series.

I only selected his movies and TV series which made an impact on his career but I'll probably think what you said and I might reconsider changing it. Fanblade81 (talk) 10:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

@Fanblade81: Thank you. I highly recommend that you consider what I said, because it would not be ideal for me to make the changes myself as it might lead to a content dispute. However, if not, I might eventually do it myself since I believe my approach would make the section more informative. The combination of the accolades and filmography in Liza Soberano's article is not a big deal and is not really the main concern. What I mean is that the term "Selected filmography" seems to be based on your own interpretation. It would be better to make it factual by explaining why those works were chosen and providing supporting details such as the movie's earnings, film ratings, or accolades received for that particular project, instead of listing them without any clear basis. - Arcrev1 (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Also, it seems that you included too many featured film titles in the main articles of the actors. It would be better to list only those that had a significant impact on their movies or series, since otherwise, the separate filmography article would lose its purpose. - Arcrev1 (talk) 11:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks Fanblade81 (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

@Arcrev1 Hi, you can make changes on Dingdong Dantes filmography on his page. That's fine by me.

I do have plans to create a paragraph form on Mr. Dantes filmography but not right now. It will take time to for me review all his films and TV series including all the data you said, his movie earning, ratings and accolades. I usually create a paragraph form in my sandbox which I edit or re-edit prior to adding it on subject's main article page. Thanks for the advice again. Fanblade81 (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

No worries. If I end up writing the paragraph, I'll still consider the feature films you listed. I'll just convert them into paragraph form and add some factual information, as I mentioned earlier. Of course, we're both busy with our own lives, so I might not be able to work on it right away. But thank you for sharing your thoughts on my suggestion. Happy editing! - Arcrev1 (talk) 12:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bea Alonzo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All About Love. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

@DPL bot okay, I will try to fix it Fanblade81 (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Overseas Workers Welfare Administration. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:13, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

@Diannaa hi

Do you want me to rewrite it because i directly added the mission? I don't know how to rewrite it but you are free to rewrite it. The original source is from Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA), it's is government website.

I added some information it to expand the article but I did not rewrite the word because I want to be faithful to the source. I just added the direct link which is from OWWA Fanblade81 (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

@Diannaa thanks for the link and I will read and review it.

you have a good day! Fanblade81 (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

It's okay to copy from public domain sources. Simply add the template {{source-attribution}} after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

@Diannaathank you. I didn't know that. I learn something new today. 🤗

I'm gonna be adding the template in my future edits Fanblade81 (talk) 05:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

@Diannaa thank you and you have good day. Fanblade81 (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

I will review the candidates and will cast my votes.🤗 Fanblade81 (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited We Win As One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ken Chan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

its fixed Fanblade81 (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Award for Movie Actress of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balota.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Template:Marian Rivera. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

@Zackmann08

Okay, thank you Fanblade81 (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of Template:Marian Rivera

Template:Marian Rivera has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Okay, thanks Fanblade81 (talk) 19:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of Template:Dingdong Dantes

Template:Dingdong Dantes has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Not using the edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 11:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Hotwiki okay, I'm sorry about that. I will do it in my next edit. Fanblade81 (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you 🤗 Fanblade81 (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Adding inactive/ dead categories

You have added an inactive and dead category to several articles. Please do not do that again. Its not helpful and this category already exists. Hotwiki (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Hotwiki okay. Can you delete the new one? Thanks you. By the way, how do I know that a certain category already existed? Fanblade81 (talk) 11:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

There's nothing to delete, as the category you added was a red link. Hotwiki (talk) 14:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Okay Fanblade81 (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Hotwiki

Hi there,

I saw you have created a re-direct page for Stars on the Floor in the List of GMA Network original programming.

you have must have noticed that I created an article page about the dance competition show, Stars on the floor , because I put a link on the List of GMA Network Programming but you removed the link and called my edit as "unreliable source".

This article Stars on the floor have reliable sources from GMA Network and other newspapers.

Second, the title of the dance competition show is "Stars on the Floor", as per advertised. I cannot move or change the title name from Stars on the floor to this Stars on the Floor because of your redirect page.

Before I consult anyone, I believe it's appropriate to check with you first.

Kindly advice and thanks Fanblade81 (talk) 15:30, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@[[User:Hotwiki|Hotwiki] hello, there

I saw you have created a re-direct page for Stars on the Floor in the List of GMA Network original programming.

you have must have noticed that I created an article page about the dance competition show, Stars on the floor , because I put a link on the List of GMA Network Programming but you removed the link and called my edit as "unreliable source".

This article Stars on the floor have reliable sources from GMA Network and other newspapers.

Second, the title of the dance competition show is "Stars on the Floor", as per advertised. I cannot move or change the title name from Stars on the floor to this Stars on the Floor because of your redirect page.

Before I consult anyone, I believe it's appropriate to check with you first.

Kindly advice and thanks Fanblade81 (talk) 15:29, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of High Energy (Manilyn Reynes album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High Energy (Manilyn Reynes album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Energy (Manilyn Reynes album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ROY is WAR Talk! 04:14, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fanblade81. Thank you for your work on Philippine Movie Press Club Star Awards. Another editor, Royiswariii, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I think this is the Philippine Movie Press Club? Then, it should be move to "Philippine Movie Press Club".

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Royiswariii}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ROY is WAR Talk! 06:11, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@Royiswariii okay Fanblade81 (talk) 02:16, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Absence of RS for date of birth

Hi! Thank you for creating Annette Gozon-Valdes's page. Please be reminded that dates of birth must be backed up with a reliable source (RS), as such information is considered to be personal information that must be dealt with carefully. Please refer to WP:BLPPRIVACY. Thank you and have a good day. _signed, Pat ^talk 06:53, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Patrick Cristiano, thanks for the heads-up. It is noted. Fanblade81 (talk) 08:24, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fanblade81. Thank you for your work on Out of Order (2025 film). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

@Mariamnei Thank you :) Fanblade81 (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Sugar official movie posterImage001.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sugar official movie posterImage001.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

@ImageTaggingBot Thank you for the heads up. I uploaded two movie posters and I forgot the suitable tag. I'm sorry and thank you. Fanblade81 (talk) 13:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

@ImageTaggingBot Hi there, I can re-upload the movie poster and add the appropriate tags for it. Thanks! Fanblade81 (talk) 13:42, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

License tagging for File:High Ground official movie posterImage001.png

Thanks for uploading File:High Ground official movie posterImage001.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

@ImageTaggingBot I will re-upload the photo with appropriate tags. Thank you Fanblade81 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sugar official movie posterImage001.png

A tag has been placed on File:Sugar official movie posterImage001.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of non-free use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 13:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Fanblade81! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 13:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Thejiujiangdragon okay, I got it. I'll do it or revise my post. Fanblade81 (talk) 02:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:High Ground official movie posterImage001.png

A tag has been placed on File:High Ground official movie posterImage001.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of non-free use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 23:05, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick hi, there

I added expanded the article by adding the mission and vision and its service structures which are available on their website which I directly attributed This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. source-attribution.

i don't know how to rewrite the vision and mission and its service structures??? you are free to rewrite them. However, by rewriting the vision and mission, I feel like I don't have the appropriate words to convey what the article stands for and I might do disservice to them.

What is your best advice or we just leave the article as it is?? Fanblade81 (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

You linked to the term "public domain" but I'm not convinced you understand the term. You aren't the first in this last week to think that material publicly available on the Internet means it is public domain. That's not remotely true.

The source of the material you copied is clearly this page

https://mowelfund.com/about-us/

Scroll to the bottom and we will see:

© 2024 Mowelfund All rights reserved.

Many things are not in the public domain even without such a notice but there's almost no doubt if that footing wording exists.

Before even thinking about rewriting it please read: Wikipedia:Avoid mission statements

There are some rare exceptions but I doubt this is one of them. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Improper use of minor edit box

Hi Fanblade81! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Stars on the Floor and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 08:06, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@Hotwiki

Hi,

Adding or correcting a wiki-link is part of minor changes which is marked as minor edit. Please refer to WP:ME. Thanks Fanblade81 (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

You added a link which is already linked at the top of the section, which is an issue. Those aren't minor edits if they cause an issue. Hotwiki (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@Hotwiki

Was it really an issue?

I noticed that the article Stars on the Floor needs updating but you do not do anything about it. The second brought a new judge and P-pop dancers, not digital dancers. However, when I try to update the page, you are quick to nit-pick a single or a minor detail. Fanblade81 (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Its not nitpicking, when you're being advised how to properly use the minor edit. Once again, you are being defensive. Hotwiki (talk) 08:45, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@Hotwiki

I asked you if it was an issue? I don't see any rules why I should not add the wiki-link?

I have seen multiple articles with wiki-links being added on number of seasons, despite the link on top of it but I have not seen other editors or administrators flagging it.

Anyway, appreciating the advice but I don't see it as problem. Fanblade81 (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Its an issue because you added the same link, which is already linked in the top of the section. Other articles have links for each season, because each season that has their own Wikipedia article. Thats not the case here. Please learn when to overlink and not. Hotwiki (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@Hotwiki okay. Fanblade81 (talk) 11:08, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Not using the edit summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Stars on the Floor did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 08:07, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Paulo Avelino

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paulo Avelino, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:35, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Notice

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anna Karenina (1996 TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 08:04, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@Hotwiki Aren't you familiar with the television series? It was one of the most popular series in the 1990s and has been rebooted again by GMA Network. It is the same story and also I watched it growing up.

I can add reliable references from GMA Network article and PEP articles. Fanblade81 (talk) 08:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Love, Siaragao official television series poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love, Siaragao official television series poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 24 June 2026 (UTC)