Welcome!

edit
Hello, Farmokopole, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous
sure, thanks!--Farmokopole (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2012

edit

Hi can you add the image of "Parsi" in the right hand column of the "Persian" language page - it should be represented there also. I would do it if I knew how to add images. Thank you.

Here is an example of a picture that should be added: It says "Parsi" with a picture of the Persian poet Ferdowsi. Thank you again. http://jawedan.com/index.php/1389-03-26-19-12-2/5345-1391-08-29-22-50-36 24.6.97.22 (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


September 2012

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page IJ (Amsterdam) has been reverted.
Your edit here to IJ (Amsterdam) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-onctEHA2I) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Argo

edit

Hey there, saw your comment about the Persian Language. Just wanted to say fair enough. You are right, the language is included if a strong language influence from a different country is included. Such as in the case of the Rush Hour film series. MisterShiney 08:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you MisterShiney. Good luck and keep in touch! --Farmokopole (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Persian carpet

edit

Please give some sort of rationale for reverts, either on the article talk page or with an edit summary. --Ronz (talk) 19:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hayedeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avaz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farmokopole (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I have just one account on Wiki, there should be a mistake in blocking me. Please unblock me. Thanks. Have a good day.

Decline reason:

This does not appear to be a mistake. As noted in your block message, a list of the activites that lead to your block are shown here. At a minimum, you should address the specific accusations. Kuru (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Good night,

The user User:Kuru has written that I need "to address the specific accusations." I have really no idea what does he/she mean and what really should I do. Please take a look to my contributions. I have been active and honest. During my activities I have had just one name and never did illegal things. I have contributed in many pages and in view of that some of them can be common with other Wikipedia users. I have been faithful with Wikipedia style and used notable references in my work. Once again I would like to emphasize on this fact that I have had just one username during my activities "farmokopole". Thank U. --Farmokopole (talk) 22:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farmokopole (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good night, The user User:Kuru has written that I need "to address the specific accusations." I have really no idea what does he/she mean and what really should I do. Please take a look to my contributions. I have been active and honest. During my activities I have had just one name and never did illegal things. I have contributed in many pages and in view of that some of them can be common with other Wikipedia users. I have been faithful with Wikipedia style and used notable references in my work. Once again I would like to emphasize on this fact that I have had just one username during my activities "farmokopole". Thank U. --Farmokopole (talk) 22:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Given the clear behavioural evidence provided at the SPI I cannot imagine a scenario wherein you are not a sock account; as such I am declining your unblock request.Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Universal Tolerance Organization

edit
 

The article Universal Tolerance Organization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unambiguous promotion/advertising

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marquardtika (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply