Welcome!

Hello, Fjsalguero! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Podemos

edit

Can you say where that is said in the article? If you go to the Left-wing populism article, it doesn't say it is a negative term. It is you the one that says it is negative, yet neither the Podemos' article or the ideology itself article. Even in the Left-wing populism Podemos is referenced as one such example. Unless you can prove your claims, I'm sorry but I'll have to revert your edit. The "it is not a left-wing populist party because I say that"-like argument is not enough to remove it from the article. Cheers. Impru20 (talk) 07:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Peruvian Writer

edit

More references to the Peruvian author (David Misari) was placed and demonstrate veracity in other pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex sanders13 (talkcontribs) 02:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Fritz-Albert Popp

edit

Hello Fjsalguero, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fritz-Albert Popp, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguous advertising. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. SoWhy 20:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Saludo

edit

Te escribo por acá para evitar el hostigamiento de NoonIcarus, ya sabes. Espero que se haga justicia, porque ese tipo te la tiene jurada, realmente te admiro por soportar tanto, me gustaría estar en mejor contacto contigo, ¿podrías pasarme tu WhatsApp? -- David C. S. (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply