Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 10

Alaska photogs

Reposting to work on.. Edited comment:

    • Winter and Pond. A short sketch is here. I'm not sure if the Alaska State Library has further information.
    • If you're working on other content in that same vein, other important later photographers in Alaska include Steve McCutcheon, Ward W. Wells and Reuel Griffin. I have PD images of Wells himself and various photos he took which were published without copyright notices. I also have a lesser number of PD images taken by the other two. My upload queue is getting kind of ridiculous coincidental with my increasing lack of time. If you have any specific questions about any of this, don't hesitate to do so, even if I may be slow in responding. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koggiung (November 1)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering 12:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koggiung has been accepted

 
Koggiung, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Point of Graves Burial Ground (November 1)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProgrammingGeek talktome 17:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Point of Graves Burial Ground (November 1)

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
ProgrammingGeek talktome 18:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Point of Graves Cemetery has been accepted

 
Point of Graves Cemetery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Huggins (November 1)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slapfish has been accepted

 
Slapfish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iliamna Bay (November 2)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SportingFlyer talk 00:49, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iliamna River (November 2)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SportingFlyer talk 00:50, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

  Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, WJXT, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:14, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Mvcg66b3r I actually didn't add any content but I did reorganize what someone else added so who her husband is wasn't the first bit noted. You removed her entirely from the article which seems improper since she has her own article and it's well cited. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
I see you added her back with a much shortened summary. Seems okay to me. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I saw the original edit was by an IP. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Alaska drafts/articles

Looks like you're working on content about photographers and/or photographic studios. Probably the most important and likely to be overlooked from a century or so ago in Alaska is Winter and Pond. A short sketch is here. I'm not sure if the Alaska State Library has further information, but as far as I know, they hold most of their collection. There's a bunch of their stuff on Commons, courtesy of the person with a fondness for mass uploading and non-useful categorization, but you can find it easily through the search dialog. If you're working on other content in that same vein, other important later photographers in Alaska include Steve McCutcheon, Ward W. Wells and Reuel Griffin. I have PD images of Wells himself and various photos he took which were published without copyright notices. I also have a lesser number of PD images taken by the other two. My upload queue is getting kind of ridiculous coincidental with my increasing lack of time. If you have any specific questions about any of this, don't hesitate to do so, even if I may be slow in responding. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks very much. I will definitely have a look into those when I get a chance. Working my way through John Nathan Cobb photos at tge moment and I need to grt back to some panoramic mapmakers and other stuff too.. So much still to do out there!!! Finding some fascinating stuff. I thought Murder Cove was interesting and sad.for a variety of reasons. Take care and thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 04:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Also, Draft:R. N. Stevens somehow got passed over by my new page patrol tracking page yet appeared in the other tracking page I use to monitor Alaska-related content. U.S. Commissioners are typically not independently notable by that basis alone. It's only because the present-day U.S. district courts use the term "magistrate judge" that people tend to confuse the titles of magistrate and judge, and therefore tend to confuse the differences in notability. A Google search was of no help, only giving me hits about registered nurses named Stevens or practicing in Stevens Point, Wisconsin. The content I see in that draft could easily be incorporated into Nome Gold Rush. Sources say far more about Arthur H. Noyes, the actual judge involved in the corruption mentioned in that draft. He lacks an article, as do many pre-statehood judges. In his case, he basically held a patronage position courtesy of Alexander McKenzie, his judicial tenure was short and I believe he died not long after leaving office. I'm not sure whether I have any relevant sources close at hand right now, but once again I'll be happy to answer questions if need be. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

 
Any idea which street this is in Ketchikan? Strangely the Ketchikan Downtown Historic District doesn't have an entry. FloridaArmy (talk)
Comparing the smaller hills in the foreground with Google Street View, I would say Main Street. I have some old photos of Ketchikan but really nothing from that era. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 05:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

User:RadioKAOS I am feeling a little overwhelmed with terminolgy such as lemmer (whaling) for whaling, brail net, and brail lines for uses other than sailing. If I create short explanatioms they won't be allowed as definitions but I'm not that comfortable doing longer articles on these subjects where I am not veru familiar. Do you know any fishing peeps that would be interested in working these subjects up? I've never really understood the definition rule when it comes to something that isn't just a word. An occupation or type of equipment is certainly a notable subject. User:Legacypac maybe you have some insight to offer? FloridaArmy (talk) 02:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

I'm no expert on fishing terms. Legacypac (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Jeff Colhoun (photographer)

Hello FloridaArmy, thank you for editing this article. Please let me know if you may have any additional insight or suggestions; I've added more references and am wondering your thoughts on if it will be moved to the review process soon. Thank you kindly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annemariecarney (talkcontribs) 05:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Annemariecarney the subject needs a couple of substantial major media reports on it to meet notability criteria for inclusion. FloridaArmy (talk)

Your draft article, Draft:Labette County High School

 

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Labette County High School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Abelmoschus Esculentus 08:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Paredon Records

  Hello, FloridaArmy. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paredon Records, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lemmer (whaling) has been accepted

 
Lemmer (whaling), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:E.W. Moore (photographer) has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:E.W. Moore (photographer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shakan Island has been accepted

 
Shakan Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 17:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Titus Salter has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Titus Salter. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 23:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peirce Island has been accepted

 
Peirce Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:E.W. Moore (photographer) has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:E.W. Moore (photographer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Point of Graves Cemetery

FYI. If you have a better hook, bring it on. 7&6=thirteen () 15:52, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

That looks great User:7&6=thirteen! I need to go read the article so see what it means.. Can't imagine a better hook than that. FYI I started Draft:Titus Salter which coukd use another good source or two if you have any.. I also started Draft:Eliphalet Daniels but I don't know if he's notable. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
I am occupied for the next few days. Real life intrudes on my addiction. Will try to get to it after Wednesday. He looks plenty notable. Will have to find some books. 7&6=thirteen () 16:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Using bing.com, I found a lot of archival and genealogical material. But not much else. Will keep looking. 7&6=thirteen () 17:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Titus Salter has been accepted

 
Titus Salter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aroostook War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madawaska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Denison Colt has been accepted

 
James Denison Colt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elias Barnabas (November 4)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Content you added to the above draft appears to have been copied from https://sdmaritime.org/library-and-research/library-and-archives/archives/euterpe-star-of-india-original-documents-collection/. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James F. Gibbons has been accepted

 
James F. Gibbons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V-talk 18:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Point of Graves Cemetery

  Hello! Your submission of Point of Graves Cemetery at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lobelia brevifolia

 

A tag has been placed on Lobelia brevifolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 05:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lobelia brevifolia has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lobelia brevifolia. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lobelia brevifolia has been accepted

 
Lobelia brevifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lobelia brevifolia

Thanks for creating Lobelia brevifolia.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Labette County High School has been accepted

 
Labette County High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

John from Idegon (talk) 07:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

 
Hello, FloridaArmy/Archive 6. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

About translations

Hi. Usually, plain copy-pastes from other language Wikipedias get speedy deleted under WP:CSD#A2, but you seem interested enough in getting it en-wiki-worthy, therefore I have moved your page to User:FloridaArmy/Yakutat and Southern Railway. As a subpage of your Userspace, you will have all the time to fiddle around with the article until it is ready for Wikipedia's main articlespace. A few tips:

  • If you know German: good, start translating.
  • If you do not know any German: follow the instructions at WP:TRANSLATETOHERE.
  • The en-wiki equivalent of railway diagrams can be found at Template:Routemap.

Happy editing! --HyperGaruda (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I tried using the tool linked to on Wikipedia's translation page. I was surprised it didn't include attribution. It also didn't translate the page, but clearly I'm not using it properly.
I also tried working my way through the translation instruction pages and templates but I was pretty lost. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
I just tried out the tool and got confused at first. While I know that the tool is disabled for new editors, I only just found out it also does not provide an automatically generated translation draft anymore. Turns out that the tool can now only be used for correctly translating wikilinks and basic templates; the actual text has to be translated manually. I know some German, so I could do it for you, but you will have to excuse me until the weekend when I'll have more time on my hands. By the way, the railway was correctly called Yakutat and Southern Railroad because it is a United States line and thus follows US English vocabulary. --HyperGaruda (talk) 21:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Interesting. Yes, I'm not sure which it's called but I've seen "Railway" several places. The German says it was incorporated as railroad and known as railway. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The machine translation seemed pretty decent from what I saw of it. I'd be happy to try and work out any kinks. Definitrly not a rush job so if you're still interested when you have some time that woukd be terrific. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulina Peavy (November 6)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 
Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing it User:Missvain. You don't think coverage such as this byline piece in the Washington Post is substantial? FloridaArmy (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Industrial Bank (Washington D.C.) has been accepted

 
Industrial Bank (Washington D.C.), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 22:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Austin Mecklem has been accepted

 
Austin Mecklem, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 14:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Lloyd Wulf has been accepted

 
William Lloyd Wulf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neander Montgomery Woods has been accepted

 
Neander Montgomery Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel P. Seaton has been accepted

 
Daniel P. Seaton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

K.e.coffman (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paredon Records has been accepted

 
Paredon Records, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 01:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahira Knight (November 8)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Catrìona (talk) 01:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Shahira Knight has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shahira Knight. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 01:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes. I think she was notable before that but added that critical bit and beefed up the sourcing before resubmitting. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murry R. Nelson has been accepted

 
Murry R. Nelson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 02:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Albert Batchellor has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Albert Batchellor. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 02:14, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Non-free content use

  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Draft:Edwin Thayer Barlow, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Thayer Barlow has been accepted

 
Edwin Thayer Barlow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George N. Moore has been accepted

 
George N. Moore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nonotuck Silk Company has been accepted

 
Nonotuck Silk Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

HighKing++ 13:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth Sciences Museum has been accepted

 
Earth Sciences Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everett Woods has been accepted

 
Everett Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Watson (November 10)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 18:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roby Brock (November 10)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 18:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Abby Phillip) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Abby Phillip.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for creating this article  

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MarkDask 21:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Office of Digital Strategy has been accepted

 
Office of Digital Strategy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 08:00, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Exhibition of the centenary of the opening of the Ports of Brazil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Santa Catarina
George N. Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Thomas Burke
Henry Smith (Texas governor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Land survey

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Resolved. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James M. Haworth has been accepted

 
James M. Haworth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Writer's Barnstar
Good job JC7V-talk 22:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kobi Karp (November 13)

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Frayae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Front Street (Juneau, Alaska) has been accepted

 
Front Street (Juneau, Alaska), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SamHolt6 (talk) 06:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spanishtown Creek

 

A tag has been placed on Spanishtown Creek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Spanishtown Creek has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Spanishtown Creek. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 21:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rex Nelson has been accepted

 
Rex Nelson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burma Rim has been accepted

 
Burma Rim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quantuck Bay has been accepted

 
Quantuck Bay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gage County Courthouse has been accepted

 
Gage County Courthouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stillingia aquatica has been accepted

 
Stillingia aquatica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 09:54, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taylor Cornelius (November 18)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
The guideline says "College athletes and coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other WP:ROUTINE coverage." There is nothing routine about the entire article about him in the Oklahoman discussing his career, background, and family. And there are other articles entirely about him.FloridaArmy (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burma Rim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterhole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

That page explains what a waterhole is. I don't know where else to target it. Perhaps waterhole should be an article? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Draft:Taylor Cornelius‎ does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Warren II (November 18)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
User:AngusWOOF, while that guideline tells us the criteria for who should be assumed to be notable it doesn't say that someone who was received substantial coverage for being the best high school football player in Ohio, the first University of Cincinatti running back to rush for more than 1,000 yarss in the last 8 years, and who already has the record for most rushing touchdowns in a season at Cincinnati (and among top 5 for career at the school) isn't notable. Common sense also applies. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
I see it as somewhat of a bright line, but I'll accept the page and you can defend it at AFD if required. If challenged it could be redirected and merged into a minibio on his team's page. Legacypac (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
That would be great User:Legacypac. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Common sense says gridiron doesn't meet it, so back it up with the sources where it meets WP:NATHLETE in general. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:10, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merchants Hotel (November 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merchants Hotel (St. Paul) has been accepted

 
Merchants Hotel (St. Paul), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otis B. Gunn (November 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't see why not and I don't think any such policy exists, but it has two now. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
WP:GNG which says "multiple sources are generally expected". See also the footnote. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Otis B. Gunn has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Otis B. Gunn. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:54, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Croix Falls Dam has been accepted

 
Saint Croix Falls Dam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FloridaArmy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Daniel has been accepted

 
Laura Daniel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks User:Missvain. Any chance you could take a look at Draft:Snell Seminary and see of you think it passes muster or what else is needed any assistance.would be great. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: L. Venchael Booth (November 20)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otis B. Gunn has been accepted

 
Otis B. Gunn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wrangell Sentinel (November 21)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SportingFlyer talk 22:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wrangell Sentinel has been accepted

 
The Wrangell Sentinel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SportingFlyer talk 23:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theodoros Bafaloukos has been accepted

 
Theodoros Bafaloukos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 08:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Rose Hill Burial Park) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rose Hill Burial Park.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

All entries need an article, or to meet MOS:DABRL or MOS:DABMENTION.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saunders and Lawton has been accepted

 
Saunders and Lawton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iliamna Bay has been accepted

 
Iliamna Bay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iliamna River has been accepted

 
Iliamna River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)