User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

Your submission at Articles for creation: A. Warren Gould (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doncram was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A. Warren Gould and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A. Warren Gould, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Doncram (talk) 22:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

If anything, I think there is too much content included from that source. But the subject is clearly notable and several sources are used. I'm not really sure what the issie your having is. Feel free to make any improvements to the article you think are warranted. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry this is heavy-handed, as I am figuring out how to use AFC as a reviewer, and trying to sort out what to draw the line on or not. I don't really care, but I pointed out that you just put in a placeholder reference to the NRHP document with no link to the actual NRHP docuemnt, instead of copy-pasting the fully-formed one with links to document, with author, date of preparation, etc., which I assume you saw at the Arctic Building article. I don't get why you would put in such a crummy version of reference. I have the impression you have been criticized for using bare URLs as references before. This is like that. I am not sure if it is quite proper for an AFC reviewer to draw a line about referencing quality like I am doing, but here we are, oh well. Please put in the higher quality NRHP reference. And provide a footnote for your birth and death dates, I also raised that. --Doncram (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

I included the link when it was pointed out to me that I had left ot out and I included exactly the same information I saw noted in the external link where it was included in the article, weirdly named Arctic Building, you pointed out. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

The NRHP reference should be moved inline in that article by I'm tentative to make many changes as I've been attacked so often. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Okay I see now that you did make a change and put in a link to a version of the NRHP document, in your reference which is exactly this:

<ref name=nrhp>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120218025437/https://fortress.wa.gov/dahp/wisaard/documents/RN/0/1/1068.pdf The Arctic Building, National Register Nomination Form], 1978</ref>

The fact that you improved it is making my request silly and obtuse maybe, but what I want is for you to put in the full NRHP reference that is in the Arctic Building article, with authors and linked photos and more, i.e. the following:

<ref name="nrhpdoc">{{cite web|url={{NRHP url|id=78002749}}|title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: Arctic Building |publisher=[[National Park Service]]|author=Lawrence Kreisman |author2=Florence K. Lentz |date=June 1978 |accessdate=June 11, 2018}} With {{NRHP url|id=78002749|photos=y|title=accompanying three photos from 1978}}</ref>

I guess it could be improved further to incorporate the copy of document that you found, so:

<ref name="nrhpdoc">{{cite web|url={{NRHP url|id=78002749}}|title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: Arctic Building |publisher=[[National Park Service]]|author=Lawrence Kreisman |author2=Florence K. Lentz |date=June 1978 |accessdate=June 11, 2018}} With {{NRHP url|id=78002749|photos=y|title=accompanying three photos from 1978}} (text also available [[https://web.archive.org/web/20120218025437/https://fortress.wa.gov/dahp/wisaard/documents/RN/0/1/1068.pdf here])</ref>

I do understand your feeling under fire, and I do feel petty about going on about this. But, still, why not use the best available version of a reference. In general I guess I think you should try hard not to appear to be taking a shortcut that makes work for other editors, like using bare-url references and in this case using a lesser quality version unnecessarily. I certainly hope we will quickly get past this picky point, and I do hope/expect to be more constructive on other articles. --Doncram (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

On my browser the whole references section is quite small. But I did see the NRHP doc listed in the External Links section which is what I used. Happy to improve the ref or any other issues upon request. If I had seen that cite I would have used it instead. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

And I didn't see that External Links version at all. Now deleted that. Thanks. I am sorry about the confusion. --Doncram (talk) 23:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm troubled that the Empire and American Bank building are treated as two in the sources but seem to be one in the photo. Is there a separate American Savings Bank building? Source says it's "adjacent". Gone now anyway it seems but I find it confusing. As best I can tell ot is one building. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Elberta peach

Elberta peaches. There are more pics at commons too.

Elberta Peach currently a redlink, article is needed. See Willow Lake (Marshallville, Georgia). One online source. Who is going to create Draft:Elberta peach? --Doncram (talk) 23:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

• YWCA Building (Seattle) needs creating. (YWCA Building--Seattle, 1118 Fifth Ave. Seattle, WA) covered here. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes about that. The source you have seems to indicate it is merely NRHP-eligible, but it was in fact listed on the NRHP. It is a redlink in National Register of Historic Places listings in Seattle, and in List of YWCA buildings. --Doncram (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

I am buried in restoration efforts. Including B&G Foods and several notable brands it acquired over the years. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elias Barnaba (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elias Barnaba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elias Barnaba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

In fairness, his nomination was for artist of the year. What about sources.such as this one from April and the other sources in the article? FloridaArmy (talk) 01:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashley Christensen has been accepted

Ashley Christensen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Great. Thanks Cassiopeia. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: B&G Foods has been accepted

B&G Foods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Food and drink

Hello, FloridaArmy. You are invited to join WikiProject Food and drink, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of food, drink and cuisine topics. Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. You can also sign up to receive project newsletters and notifications at the notifications list, even if you choose not to join. North America1000 22:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alco Films has been accepted

Alco Films, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Biblio (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Colin Teague (missionary)

Hello. Do you intend to expand Draft:Colin Teague (missionary) and move it to main space please?Zigzig20s (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Anyone is welcome to work on the article or move it back to mainspace. He's a very inyeresting historical figure. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Alco Films

The company existed for less than a year, and I think it will prove difficult to develop the article much beyond a stub. Should we merge the info into Metro Pictures? Sam Sailor 17:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC) (please  mention me on reply)

I think it's best covered independently. Although it was short lived it has receoved substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. It can be expanded. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kajala Masanja (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kajala Masanja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kajala Masanja, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Doesn't she pass the general notabiloty guideline bu having substantial coverage in reliable independemt sources? Several soirces refer to her as a star of Bongo Films (Tanzanian cinema) and she is discussed, interviewed, and covered in depth for a variety of aspects of her career including relationships and controversies. FloridaArmy (talk) 04:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pughsville, Virginia (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pughsville, Virginia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pughsville, Virginia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

1) I don't see where it's covered in the targeted article. 2) The settlement predates Suffolk. Notability does not expire. 3) It is on the border area of Suffolk and Chesapeake so redirecting to one or the other would be improper. FloridaArmy (talk) 06:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Compare for example to Driver, Virginia which is also part of Suffolk, closer to the city of Suffolk, and no part of which is in Chesapeake.@user:Legacypac FloridaArmy (talk) 06:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

If you feel strongly about it youbcan simply edit over the redirect at this title. You don't need AfC approval. Legacypac (talk) 06:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't think that would be the correct approach. A proper move and either a proper merge or leaving this historically African American community as an independent article subject would be the only policy consistent outcomes. FloridaArmy (talk) 06:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

And as I've noted, a merge doesn't make much sense to me because there are other communities in Suffolk that have their own articles and this one is especially notable and along a border area with part of it in Chesapeake. 06:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcus Jernegan has been accepted

Marcus Jernegan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Felipe Vigamy) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Felipe Vigamy, FloridaArmy!

Wikipedia editor Domdeparis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Write a helpful note for FloridaArmy. It will be posted on their talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dom from Paris (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Panowich (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir Joseph was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Panowich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Panowich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir Joseph ^(talk) 20:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mona High School (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir Joseph was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mona High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mona High School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir Joseph ^(talk) 20:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wright's Liquid Smoke (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wright's Liquid Smoke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wright's Liquid Smoke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pughsville, Virginia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pughsville, Virginia. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 22:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pughsville, Virginia (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pughsville, Virginia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pughsville, Virginia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 22:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Cyclopedia of the Colored Race has been accepted

National Cyclopedia of the Colored Race, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Commission on Industrial Relations (Nebraska) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Commission on Industrial Relations (Nebraska). Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 23:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@user:legacypac I suspect many people still call it by its original name as it is still a court with judges. Buy I adjusted the content to reflect the name change. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commission on Industrial Relations (Nebraska) has been accepted

Commission on Industrial Relations (Nebraska), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barnesville, Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warren Township, Ohio

Liquid smoke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Manitowoc

• Fixed. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pughsville, Virginia has been accepted

Pughsville, Virginia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 10:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Great! Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RDX (reggae duo) (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RDX (reggae duo) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RDX (reggae duo), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

@user:gene93k can you please explain why the Jamaica Gleaner articles entirely about the band don't establish notability? FloridaArmy (talk) 05:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Corregio Smith (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Corregio Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thomas Corregio Smith, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Feather Barnstar
	Is awarded for awarded for the creation of good articles for a long period of time. The 403 articles which you have created greatly enhance the encyclopedia. – Lionel(talk) 09:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much Lionel! I enjoyed writing them. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Page moves to draft part 4

The following articles have been draftified:--

• Draft:Colin Teague (missionary)

• Draft:Lisa Curtis (restored)

• Draft:Magnus Devold (restored)

• Draft:Kajala Masanja

• Draft:Elias Barnaba

• Draft:The Nashville PRIDE

• Draft:National Cyclopedia of the Colored Race (restored)

• Draft:John Crudele (restored)

• Draft:Henry A. Rucker (restored)
• Draft:Thomas E. Askew (restored)

• Draft:Britannia Depicta (restored)
• Draft:William Woolnoth (restored)

• Draft:Charles Pye (engraver) (restored)

• Draft:Samuel Barenger (restored)

• Draft:Thomas Corregio Smith
• Draft:Joseph Hoag (restored)

• Draft:Ebenezer Thompson Baird (restored)

The following articles have been redirected:--

• Collinsville Formation -- I restored it and developed it somewhat. The original version would not have gotten through AFC probably, but redirect to one park where an example of it is exposed was not proper either. --Doncram (talk) 20:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
• Robert Church Jr. (restored}
• James M. Cox Jr. (restored)
• Robert Matson (restored)

Some other articles have been slapped with maintainence tags.

You are advised to read this t/p thread, concerned with notability of engravers et al.

Best, ~ Winged Blades^Godric 02:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

‎

• I understand that it must be frustrating to have a bunch of articles moved to draftspace, and honestly some of them already assert enough notability as is. But would you mind working on some of them in draftspace? I've been improving my fair share to move to main, and doing so will help you get back in the good graces of the community. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 19:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the note and for your help Eddy. Very much appreciated. For the moment I am trying to take things slow. But I hope I can help restore as many of the subjects as possible. I wouldn't have created them if I didn't think they were worthwhile and I am sorry to see them disappeared. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

A lot of the articles that I moved to draft space do make significant claims to notability but the sourcing was not sufficient to back up the claims. With a bit of work the sources have been added and the articles are back in mainspace. The trouble is that you were creating close to 100 articles a month at a rate of sometimes nearly 20 articles in a day. This created a massive workload for other editors especially new pages reviewers and editors participating in Afd and the closing admin. All of that could have been avoided if you'd slowed down and concentrated on correctly sourcing an article before creating another. You've seen what editors like Editorofthewiki and Carole have done to bring the articles up to scratch, it takes a bit of effort but now the articles are quality articles and pass review with flying colours. I hope this hasn't discouraged you because you seem to have an eye for finding useful and interesting encyclopedic subjects that enriched Wikipedia. They are way more useful than some of the promotional crude they we deal with from COI and PAID editors. Dom from Paris (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

• Bloomington Rail Trail
• B-Line Rail Trail

Didn't see these listed and don't want them forgotten. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I have moved out Charles Pye (engraver). Charles Matthews (talk) 04:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Crudele has been accepted

John Crudele, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Nice work! ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 15:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Mahan Jr. (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Mahan Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George Mahan Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 12:26, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Julian F. Everett has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Julian F. Everett. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 01:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian F. Everett has been accepted

Julian F. Everett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Mahan Jr. has been accepted

George Mahan Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Estes Mann has been accepted

Estes Mann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Doncram (talk) 19:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bellows Falls Canal has been accepted

Bellows Falls Canal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Bellows Falls Canal - infobox?

This might work well, Template:Infobox canal? KJP1 (talk) 13:14, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Looks okay to me. I tried adding it but the image came out huuuuge. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Scenic railroad has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scenic railroad. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steven Sainz (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steven Sainz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steven Sainz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mona High School has been accepted

Mona High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 16:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Maureen Callahan (food writer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maureen Callahan (food writer). Thanks! Catrìona (talk) 21:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Adolphus Humbles has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adolphus Humbles. Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 23:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Gettis (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Gettis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James Gettis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durkee (food business) has been accepted

Durkee (food business), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trial of Joseph Spell has been accepted

Trial of Joseph Spell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 21:05, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sid Brown (boxer) (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sid Brown (boxer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sid Brown (boxer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 11:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John James (U.S. Senate candidate) (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John James (U.S. Senate candidate) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John James (U.S. Senate candidate), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 05:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

The cited source is a New York Times article entirely about him. How is that far far away from demonstrating notability? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asclepias pedicallata has been accepted

Asclepias pedicallata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warea cuneifolia has been accepted

Warea cuneifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 02:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warea (plant) has been accepted

Warea (plant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transberingia has been accepted

Transberingia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 03:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Warea (genus)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Warea (genus), FloridaArmy!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see the citation needed tag.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 06:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casey DeSantis (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Casey DeSantis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Casey DeSantis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 00:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:John James (U.S. Senate candidate)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:John James (U.S. Senate candidate), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AaronWikia (talk) 23:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

WTF? It's bad enough we don't have an article on the primary winning Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan but how was this deleted as advertising out of my draft space? Substantial coverage of James includes an entire New York Times article that was cited. This place is fucking nuts. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

I agree that it is very unusual to delete a draft article. I hope that you know that it is not really deleted but only hidden, so that you could request that an administrator un-deletes so that you can continue working on it. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Adolphus Humbles has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adolphus Humbles. Thanks! The Duke of Nonsense^{What is necessary for thee?} 20:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belmont County Children's Home has been accepted

Belmont County Children's Home, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Great: Thanks Catriona. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syd Brown (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syd Brown and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Syd Brown, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

I believe the international boxing titles and substantial coverage establish notability. An AfD would be a more appropriate venue to determine notability. And I'm not sure what about the articles covering him, his matches, a controversy over a fixed bout, and an obituary don't establish notability. Seems like more bias. A title holding boxer West Indies and Jamaican champion during his career isn't notable according to whom? FloridaArmy (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adolphus Humbles (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adolphus Humbles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adolphus Humbles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 16:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

I resubmitted. Seems like systemic bias to me. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Articles

I just want to say, nice work with article writing lately and avoiding drama. Several drafts have been move to mainspace. Maybe you can get your ban on new articles lifted soon. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 18:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Eddy! But I really haven't been very active. If my contributions aren't welcome or wanted so be it. But I do hope Wikipedia gets better. It's not well. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Minatti has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minatti. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 18:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maureen Callahan (food writer) (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maureen Callahan (food writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maureen Callahan (food writer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Minatti has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Minatti. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 23:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

My understanding is that inhabited places are considered inherently notable. This one is discussed in a variety of sources although the depth is somewhat limited. It seems to me to be suitable for a stand-alone article. I also added some content to the Lake Hancock article in the meantime. The Draft approval process if very slow and quite broken. Legitimate drafts where notability isn't absolutely 100% clear cut re never taken to AfD for community input. They just languish. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twelfth Street Industrial Historic District has been accepted

Twelfth Street Industrial Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

FYI, for a brand new NRHP listing, there is always an official announcement within a weekly listing from the NPS which can/should be used as source for info to go into an infobox, in addition to the type of local newspaper announcements which you found already. Much of this infobox-type info is already quickly put into the corresponding NRHP county/city list-article without link to the official announcement. The list-article includes the exact date of NRHP listing; this can be used to find the specific weekly listing in the NPS's list of weekly announcements in 2018. I added this type of reference and an infobox for the Twelfth Street article. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

P.S. From past experience, having a starter infobox helps get AFC approvals more quickly, and they're pretty easy to adapt from any existing NRHP article or from running the NRHP infobox generator. I suggest always creating one. --Doncram (talk) 00:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the note @Doncram. I generally avoid fooling much with infoboxes. But perhaps I can try to copy one over for future NRHP property articles. If you can offer any help with Draft:Isaiah T. Hatton (Isaiah Hatton) and Draft:Romulus C. Archer I would appreciate it. I used the tool to look for NRHP listed properties but only came up with ones I had already included. Also, the campus of Virginia University of Lynchburg is a historic district but another editor objected it being called ... Virginia University of Lynchburg Historic District. What is the historic distrixr called? Also in the county listing it doesn't seem to be listed as a historic district which sems weird an unhelpful to me. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The weekly listing doesn't seem to inckude much info. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Right, the weekly listing is extremely minimal, but for Twelfth Street HD still had a few bits that your starter article did not have. And it is the definitive, authoritative source for the date of NRHP listing and for the NRHP reference number. Note that an NRHP application document usually doesn't have the date of eventual listing.

The NRHP infobox generator shows that the campus is listed as "Virginia University of Lynchburg". It suggests link to NRHP document at NPS that fails to find anything; i have to follow wp:NRHPHELPVA suggestion to find the state-supplied document, here, which verifies that the name does not include "Historic District", and I would avoid coining a new phrase. wp:NRHPHELPVA includes a sample reference to be completed out.

About the NRHP county list-articles and the individual infoboxes failing to note that a district is indeed a historic district, even when "Historic District" is part of the name of the place, yeah that happens. It's a general (though not too horrible) problem that the NRIS database field for that is quite imperfect, passed on to the tables and infoboxes which were directly generated from NRIS originally. You could just change it, e.g. by adding "hd" as the type in the infobox. --Doncram (talk) 01:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't really see how calling a historic district a historic district coins a new term. When is a historic district not a historic district. Anyway, hopefully the compromise edit I worked out holds. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raila Odinga, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nyanza and Kikuyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Fixed. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:55, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CVM Television (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CVM Television and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CVM Television, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CVM Television has been accepted

CVM Television, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 14:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Great! Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Motta (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanley Motta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stanley Motta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 14:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry L. Franklin has been accepted

Harry L. Franklin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minatti (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Minatti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Minatti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Aren't populated places considered notable? If it's going to be expanded it will become undue in an article on a nearby lake. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elias Barnaba (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elias Barnaba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elias Barnaba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 01:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Daggering

Do we really need to explain this? You link notables, esp. when it says "notable". If you think a draft is ready, move it. Yourself. Don't demand others do it. Meatsgains, is there something I'm missing here? Drmies (talk) 02:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm not allowed to move the draft or I would. Systematic bias (ie. bigotry and discrimination) are big problems here. I added 2 cites noting RDX as key players in the daggering phenomenon as well as having recorded the hit song daggering. Excluding them from the article would be inappropriate. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: T. Parker Smith (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:T. Parker Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:T. Parker Smith, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 17:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Ron DeSantis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - MrX 🖋 19:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Always the edit warriors serving up the misguided warnings. You removed longstanding content from the article. You were reverted. You did it again. Now you've taken the issue to the talk page. It's an interesting argument that we should exclude a person's legal career and service as a JAG attorney from the lede. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Julian F. Everett

Hello! Your submission of Julian F. Everett at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)