User talk · Discussions · Rosso Corsa · Scuderia Wikipedia · Tempio della Velocità
Welcome to my user talk page. This is my Wikipedia pit wall for discussions about articles, drafts, sources, translation, formatting, motorsport, circuits, and collaboration.
Theme: Rosso Corsa · Ferrari · Monza · Motorsport · Scuderia Wikipedia Motto:Velocità, precisione, fonti affidabili. — speed, precision, and reliable sources. Atmosphere: red, speed, machinery, circuits, pit lane work, collaboration, source checking, and article tuning. Focus: motorsport, racing circuits, sports events, translation, formatting, source cleanup, and draft improvement.
Scuderia ForestiaoRosso Corsa Talk Interface
Rosso Corsa
This talk page uses Ferrari red as its main visual theme. The red is not only decoration: it is a reminder to edit with energy, but also with restraint; to respond quickly, but also to respect facts and sources.
Monza Spirit
Monza represents speed, straights, braking points, and judgement. Article editing is similar: remove clutter, reduce promotional wording, tune phrasing, check sources, and let the text reach the facts by the cleanest line.
Wikipedia Garage
Wikipedia is an open garage. Every editor can help tune articles: improve structure, check citations, fix translations, rewrite leads, and remove unreliable or non-encyclopedic material.
Article content, draft review, draft moves, and mainspace issues
Motorsport, circuits, teams, drivers, events, and season articles
Translation, terminology, and article title handling
Sources, citations, notability, neutrality, and verifiability
Formatting, templates, categories, infoboxes, navboxes, and article structure
Other Wikipedia collaboration matters
Before leaving a message
Use a clear section title for new topics.
Keep replies under the relevant section when possible.
Please sign your message with ~~~~.
Please do not alter other editors’ comments.
For draft discussions, please provide the page link and the main issue.
Older discussions may be archived when appropriate.
Rosso Corsa Editing Philosophy
Speed
Discussion can be quick and revisions can be timely, but encyclopedic writing should not be rushed. Useful speed means quickly finding the issue, checking the source, and moving the article toward a more stable version.
Precision
Racing needs precise braking points; Wikipedia needs precise wording. Vague statements, promotional tone, unsourced phrasing, and overreliance on media wording can weaken neutrality and accuracy.
Reliability
Reliable sources are like racing telemetry. Article content should withstand checking, citations should support the text, and references should be structural support rather than decoration.
Garage Status Board
Draft Setup
Draft creation, structure planning, lead cleanup, section order, and basic source framework.
Source Check
Checking reliable sources, making sure citations support the text, and avoiding excessive reliance on promotional material.
Copy Edit
Reducing redundant wording, removing news-style phrasing, and improving clarity and neutrality.
Final Lap
Checking notability, neutrality, formatting, citations, categories, and internal links before submission or publication.
Motorsport Terminology Board
Pit Wall
The command area in motorsport; here it refers to this user talk page.
Box
A pit instruction; here it can also mean “please discuss on the talk page”.
Setup
Car setup; here it refers to article structure and formatting adjustments.
Telemetry
Racing data; here it represents sources, citations, and verifiable information.
Final Lap
The final check before review, publication, or major revision.
Monza Notice Board
If you are here to discuss an article: please point to the page, section, source, or specific sentence. This makes the issue easier to understand and faster to fix.
If you are here to discuss a draft: please say whether the issue is notability, insufficient sourcing, promotional tone, formatting, title choice, or translation.
If you are here to collaborate on motorsport articles: feel free to discuss circuits, events, teams, seasons, drivers, race results, sources, and terminology.
Scuderia Message Map
Articles and Drafts
Does the page have reliable sources?
Are the sources independent of the subject?
Does the text avoid promotional tone?
Does the lead summarize instead of listing excessive detail?
Does the article rely too much on news-report wording?
Are there repeated phrases such as “according to reports” or “sources show”?
Motorsport
Are event names, circuit names, and team names consistent?
Should any English technical terms be retained?
Are race result tables clear?
Are reliable statistical sources available?
Does the circuit article need coordinates, layout, length, corner count, or related data?
Does the article need translation, localization, or formatting cleanup?
Style Statement
This page uses Ferrari red, the Italian tricolour, a dark pit-wall background, and white information cards as its main visual language.
Red represents speed and enthusiasm, white represents readability, and the darker background represents the atmosphere of a pit lane or night circuit.
These design choices are decorative only and do not imply any affiliation with any team, brand, or organization.
Nota bene: Although this page uses racing and Ferrari-inspired styling, discussion here should remain focused on Wikipedia collaboration. Please keep comments civil, specific, verifiable, and constructive.
Notice: Article, draft, translation, source, and formatting discussions are welcome. Please reply under the relevant topic when possible; use the “Start a new topic” link above for new discussions. Please do not alter other editors’ comments. Older discussions may be moved to archive pages.
Archives:Archive 1 · Archive 2 Older notices and discussions may be moved to archive pages; recent discussions should remain on this page.
━━━━━━━━━━ New messages below · Box, box ━━━━━━━━━━
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:
Hello, Forestiao!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! grapesurgeon (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply