Formyparty

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Formyparty, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Please further clarify on what is considered moving a page disruptively. Formyparty (talk) 00:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Maybe a caution is enough for this. But you did move NTT to NTT (disambigation) when NTT (disambiguation) holds the move. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Formyparty, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hello, I'm Kline. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Los Angeles FC—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Kline • talk • contribs 23:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at French Open, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

personal attack? reliable source? Formyparty (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Please stop all this disruptive editing. Govvy (talk) 09:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

please elaborate further on why you think my edits are vandalism/disruptive editing, thanks Formyparty (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in X (social network), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. per MOS:BOLDLINK, links in the first sentence of the lead should not be bolded. Neo Purgatorio (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Caixa Econômica Federal. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at AC Milan. Angelo (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 04:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello. In your revision to Philippine-American War, why did you make a major change to the lead sentence of the article and then mark it as a minor change? Furthermore, you did not include an edit summary offering a reason for the edit. Please do not do that again. You are invited to talk about any contentious changes you believe are warranted. Thank you. Chino-Catane (talk) 18:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Email. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Angelo (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Yeah I don't understand how that's an unconstructive edit. Formyparty (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

It is, because you're doing changes that go against the current status quo on all similar articles, where a certain kind of manual of style is followed. The very fact it got reverted, and similar changes of yours on other articles as well, should be quite telling in fact. And even more so because you are not supposed to keep pushing your changing repeatedly, per WP:CONSENSUS. If you disagree with the current way the article is made, feel free to propose your changes on the related article talk page instead; otherwise, as you have already been blocked before for similar behaviour, you might very well end up on a longer ban, as that would easily be deemed as disruptive behaviour. Regards, Angelo (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Montreal Canadiens, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop pushing your changes without a proper consensus, or you might face another block. Regards, Angelo (talk) 08:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Montreal Canadiens) for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 12:28, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Email. You have been repeatedly warned not to push your changes without a consensus forcibly, yet you have failed to do so consistently. Talk pages are explicitly meant to discuss changes other users have challenged, and you are strongly encouraged to use them to start a conversation in such cases. This is a final warning: any other repeated attempt at forcibly pushing your changes, regardless of other users' reverts, will lead to a longer block on your account. Angelo (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at European Portuguese. You have already reverted on your article lead changes multiple times, yet you keep forcing your changes, nonetheless, despite not having a clear consensus on them. This is a kind of behaviour that goes against Wikipedia guidelines and rules (WP:CONSENSUS and more) and you have been repeatedly warned in the past about not repeating it. This is a final warning; any further behaviour in this pattern, and I will have to consider enforcing a longer block on your account. Regards, Angelo (talk) 14:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

It was one revert, that's not WP:OWN Formyparty (talk) 16:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

You did one more revert on July 17 already, so yes, it is WP:OWN. And it is a kind of pattern you have repeated on multiple articles already. I hope you understand this is not good practice and it will lead to a longer block if repeated. Angelo (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)