User talk:Fox/November 2011
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is 
Hurricanehink (submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:
Hurricanehink (submissions)
Sp33dyphil (submissions)
Yellow Evan (submissions)
Miyagawa (submissions)
Wizardman (submissions)
Casliber (submissions)
Resolute (submissions)
PresN (submissions)
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
- The Featured Article Award: Casliber (submissions), for his performance in round 2. Hurricanehink (submissions) matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
- The Good Article Award: Yellow Evan (submissions), for his performance in round 4.
- The Featured List Award: Miyagawa (submissions), for his performance in round 4. PresN (submissions) matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
- The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics): PresN (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
- The Did You Know Award:
The Bushranger (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The In the News Award:
Candlewicke (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews): Wizardman (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.
Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
2011 WikiCup participation
It was good to have you on board this time around- we hope you enjoyed the competition! In case you are interested, signups for next year are open. Thanks, J Milburn and The ed17 20:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Fox/November 2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
About Sentou Gakuen
Hi there, When I was going to edit the pages and adding more references. It seems that my article, Sentou Gakuen already deleted.
Just now I do another research and I found another sources and references appearing regarding this such as from Siliconera http://www.siliconera.com/2011/11/03/whats-a-massively-multiplayer-online-visual-novel-ask-sentou-gakuen/ and from OtakuStudy (Dunno this one) http://www.otakustudy.com/2011/11/what-do-you-get-when-you-cross-a-visual-novel-with-online-features-and-indie-developers/
So I need your help Canestenmobile (talk) 03:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah thank you.
- And by the way how do I know that this article is notable enough and ready to be placed on article space?
- Well this is my first article here :< still need to figure out how things work at Wikipedia
- Oh I see,
- And what should I do, when I think the article is ready? Is there any people that I need to ask to review or that userpage is constantly monitored? ::Canestenmobile (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- All right, will do ・ｗ・ ～～～～Canestenmobile (talk) 04:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Sentou Gakuen
Hey I kinda need help on format on references (citing webpages). Can you take look at the article? Is it okay or? hmmm, thanks! Canestenmobile (talk) 09:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
FYI
I've posted some comments at Joe Danger's FAC. Please bear with me, it's my first detailed FAC review. Feel free to object to any of my concerns. 
HurricaneFan25 15:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
...for your help. Cheers, 76.248.149.98 (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
Article Feedback Tool - Newsletter 1
Hey, guys and girls! You're receiving this because you signed up (or manually requested) the Article Feedback Tool Version 5 Newsletter. This is for people who care about making the AFT a better feature, but don't necessarily want to have to participate in every discussion. Instead, I'll be sending a newsletter around twice a month talking about what's been decided and what's still up for discussion - that way, if you're interested in specific features or ideas, you'll know when to jump in :). If you know anyone who fits into this category (or you're a talkpage watcher who does) please sign up here to receive more updates in the future.
First off, editors have already been picking at the basic design, and I've forwarded their suggestions to the devs. Those ideas which are worthy of further investigation (or being programmed into the software) are listed in the status box at the top of the talkpage. Community suggestions that the devs like include:
- Allowing for up and down-voting of comments to indicate priority (suggested by User:Bensin)
- Having comments link to the version of the article (as well as the article) that they refer to (suggested by User:RJHall)
- Including the AFT box as a hidden drop-down from a "feedback" button on section headings (suggested by User:Utar)
So already there's been some great ideas - I was in a meeting yesterday in which they confirmed that the developers are actively looking at how to include Utar's suggestion pretty quickly. There are still a lot of open issues, however; most pressing this week is what level of access IPs should have to submitted comments? The Foundation's plan calls for IP addresses to be only allowed to read the comments, but not to vote on or comment on their priority - this is intended to reduce gaming - but editors may have different opinions. If you like this level of access, want something more open, or want something more closed, please drop a note here.
Hope to see you all on the talkpage soon, with any developments, ideas or suggestions you may have. All the best, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh - and the next Office Hours session will be held on Thursday at 19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. Give me a poke if you can't make it but want me to send you the logs when they're released - we'll be holding sessions timed for East Coast editors and Australasian/Asian editors next week. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Deleted article named "Fischer Pharmaceuticals Ltd"
Hi Fox,
I would like to resubmit an article (page) to Fischer Pharmaceuticals. Our page has been deleted by you and we would like to recreate it according to the wikipedia guidelines. Please assist us with this matter.
Thank you. Shirley Ofer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirleyofer (talk • contribs) 12:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Errors in Louis XVII of France
I have been trying for years to get the article on Louis XVII of France corrected , it is full of errors. For instants the death certificate you have is invalid. It was signed by two guards who only knew the boy in prison for a very short time after the real Louis XVII was already gone from The Temple.b At the time as now it required the signatures of family or close associates to validate a certificate. The sister was in the same prison and so were the family Tison long time servants of the Royal family.. Secondly a death certificates of Louis XVII exists in Delft Holland signed by a son and a Mayor of the Dutch Army and authorized by the King of Holland. Why is this legitamate certificate missing? See part of the article under Naundorff. This is only one of the many errors in the article written under the influence of the de Bourbon Parma family (Mr P. Delorme) and the French government and the Orleans family. The links to the P. Delorme site do not work, no scientific article on his DNA research exists. No link to his DNA research is active. Do not start me I could go on and on. edmond123Edmond321 (talk) 15:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
224 (number) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 224 (number). Since you had some involvement with the 224 (number) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 84.203.34.252 (talk) 02:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:34, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number ones for Boxing Day
Hey Fox, just wanted to run the idea of having the above list on the main page for Boxing Day? It would need to be updated for the 2011 number 1, and I'd appreciate it if you could check for dabs, MOS violations, dead links etc, but assuming you can do all that, let me know and I'll slate it for our own Xmas No.1... The Rambling Man (talk) 18:28, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, for what it's worth I've removed all that number two nonsense. Still interested? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:26, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
For the help and listening in #wikimedia-au connect! :D
Thanks
Appreciate it. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 16:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Hey! Quick Question about a Page
I created a page about Theory 47 and you tagged it as subjection to deletion. I wrote under the section why the page should remain and i'm asking you to consider leaving the page up. Theory 47 is an up and coming band in the Long Island music scene who has been around for 3 years. they have released two studio albums and are currently signing with a label for their third due out in the winter. thank you! i appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarrock165 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Office Hours
- Hey, fokseh! Acknowledging that office hours sessions are normally pretty...what's the polite word...shit for those in the south-and-right-a-bit-hemisphere (what with being held at around 4am) I'm holding a session on Saturday at 3am UTC in #wikimedia-office on the Article Feedback Tool. Hopefully that fits nicely into the middle of the aussie day, and you can attend :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
userpage
I like it! Nice work! Eta-theta (autographs) 18:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Hey
Hope you are having a wonderful Friday :-) Are you still accepting copy-editing requests? Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 01:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
MagicScore
Hello, You have removed the page MagicScore_(software) for what? It is not subject to copyright law, as its author, I like the English version as well as in Russian, where it was created originally.
If possible, ask to recover. Thanks in advance!
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.Hi could you explain your reason for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yochanan as you did. I was surprised to see it closed as Delete, after there was quite a lengthy discussion about a merge proposal. Also, despite being originally suggested in the deletion rational, I am not seeing the incentive to move Rabbi Yochanan; I struck out my original !vote and the last comment didn't seem to offer an explanation. None of the others addressed such a move. It might also help to look at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Dabs with honorific titles which I initiated, where we seemed to agree that such pages are valid. The discussion was a confusing one so I'm just hoping to understand how you interpreted it. Thanks, France3470 (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Article Feedback Tool newsletter
Hey, all! A quick update on how version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool is developing. I'm sending this to both newsletter recipients and regular participants, because I appreciate we've been a bit quiet :).
So, we're just wrapping up the first round of user contributions. A big thank you to everyone who has contributed ideas (a full list of which can be found at the top of the page); thanks almost entirely to contributions by editors, the tool looks totally different to how it did two months ago when we were starting out. Big ideas that have made it in include a comment voting system, courtesy of User:Bensin, an idea for a more available way of deploying the feedback box, suggested by User:Utar, and the eventual integration of both oversight and the existing spam filtering tools into the new version, courtesy of..well, everyone, really :).
For now, the devs are building the first prototypes, and all the features specifications have been finalised. That doesn't mean you can't help out, however; we'll have a big pile of shiny prototypes to play around with quite soon. If you're interested in testing those, we'll be unveiling it all at this week's office hours session, which will be held on Friday 2 December at 19:00 UTC. If you can't make it, just sign up here. After that, we have a glorious round of testing to undertake; we'll be finding out what form works the best, what wording works the best, and pretty much everything else under the sun. As part of that, we need editors - people who know just what to look for - to review some sample reader comments, and make calls on which ones are useful, which ones are spam, so on and so forth. If that's something you'd be interested in doing, drop an email to okeyes@wikimedia.org.
Thanks to everyone for their contributions so far. We're making good headway, and moving forward pretty quickly :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
BHR Pharma, LLC. article deleted
Hello,
The article I posted titled BHR Pharma, LLC. was deleted and flagged as an advertisement. Do you have recommendations on edits so I can repost the article. The purpose is to help create awareness of Tramatic Brain Injury along with novel and emerging therapies.
Thank you, Jeffrey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmacallister (talk • contribs) 21:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)