Multiple edits noone of them accurate

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
[[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]] [[5]]
((Argento1985) 00:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

Inaccurate Data

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
your entries in here are fake and this is spam [[6]] [[7]] ((Argento1985) 09:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

insisting on adding un-announced players

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
your entries in here are fake [[8]] [[9]] [[10]] ((Argento1985) 17:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

multiple entries

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
there is no need for multiple entries when there is no official termination of player loan. your recent edits [[11]] and [[12]] about 1) Lamine and 2) Sachetti made the players visible on both of teams of ael [[13]] and doxa [[14]]
((Argento1985) 13:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

another edge of vandalism

edit


you have just hit again with falcao edit.
that player had an agreement but not announced yet. so the changed will not be valid until is officially announced by the club. heres your edit -> [[15]]
((Argento1985) 00:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

Vandalism again

edit


vandalism happened again [[16]]
  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
((Argento1985) 23:51, 31 May 2013 (UTC))Reply

hate/disgrace speech

edit

your recent edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anorthosis_Famagusta_FC&diff=prev&oldid=556747942) shows hate/disgrace and an attack to individual personalities be aware that similar actions are not supported nor accepted.
  Hello, I'm Argento1985. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!
((Argento1985) 02:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC))Reply

Nomination of Elpida Xylofagou for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elpida Xylofagou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elpida Xylofagou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 03:10, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nikos Egglezou

edit
 

The article Nikos Egglezou has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nicolas Anastasiou

edit
 

The article Nicolas Anastasiou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not yet notable per WP:NFOOTY, as he hasn't yet played in a professional match.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nicos Efthimiou

edit
 

The article Nicos Efthimiou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced per WP:BLP, and not yet notable per WP:NFOOTY as he hasn't yet played in a professional match.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nikos Egglezou

edit
 

The article Nikos Egglezou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable youth player who has never appeared in a fully-professional league. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 20:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Enzo Zidane

edit
 

The article Enzo Zidane has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andreas Christofides

edit
 

The article Andreas Christofides has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 17:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andreas Konstantinou

edit
 

The article Andreas Konstantinou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. The one appearance listed in the infobx is not verified by reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marios Antoniades for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marios Antoniades is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marios Antoniades until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kosm1fent 12:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Enzo Fernández

edit
 

The article Enzo Fernández has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Debojyoti (talk) 10:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anorthosis Famagusta FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikos Nicolaou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to AS Monaco FC, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SpencerT♦C 05:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

You have been accused of vandalism, Fterov. Please be more careful when adding material to add a source or citation, and to explain why you have removed material. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bearian (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply


Fofanas Squad number has not been announced by the club, in the future do not edit anything unless its officially announced. your edit in here is just a guess [[17]]. wikipedia doesnt work that way.
  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ((Argento1985) 19:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

06 / 06 / 2013

edit

with your edit here [[18]] you removed and vandalized original content of Anorthosis Famagusta ((Argento1985) 08:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 12:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

After 1st block activity

edit


As i can see after your block expired you have returned with more intention to vandalize [[19]] [[20]] for your interest this person doesnt belong to Anorthosis, and skopelitis still being the captain. ((Argento1985) 02:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC))Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  SpencerT♦C 02:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Constantinos Laifis

edit
 

The article Constantinos Laifis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Panayiotis Loizides

edit
 

The article Panayiotis Loizides has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andreas Fotiou

edit
 

The article Andreas Fotiou has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Samad Oppong

edit

your recent edits about[Samad Oppong] were unreferenced and were based on rumors, furthermore were reverted due to the inaccuracy. Argento1985 12:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ethnikos Achna FC

edit

[reason of removing such player of the ethnikos achnas roster?] no reference no nothing. Argento1985 00:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

insisting on not following the community rules

edit

user has been blocked twice and after the 2nd block expired he returned with 5 more violations, dispute editing, vandalism and adding and removing content without any reaon reference nor citation here are 5 of the 30+ of his edits. [[21]] [[22]] [[23]] [[24]] [[25]] Argento1985 00:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  SpencerT♦C 04:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mario Daniel Vega

edit

Please provide references on every edit you do for example on [this edit], so we can count your change as accurate. Argento1985 20:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lenos Georgiou for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lenos Georgiou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenos Georgiou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GGT (talk) 14:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Angelos Perikleous for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angelos Perikleous is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelos Perikleous until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply