Fullstackdev
Attacks on civilians during the Kobani protests
editI have added an Amnesty International source which as to me is rather critical to the Kurdish liberation movement but viewed as mostly neutral by international observers. I hope you can refrain from reverting to inserting a half-sentence like you did last time. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Kobani olaylarının birebir canlı şahidi olarak ilkgün evime 20 metre uzaklıkta olan yerde gösteri yaptılar ve polis müdahale etmedi. Demirtaşın açıklamasından sonra gece bizim sokağımıza girerek tüm esnafın ve evlerin camlarını taşladılar. Bence bu konuyu hiç uzatma. Birebir şahidiyim. Ek olarak kaynakta ekledim. Yapılan şey bize benim mahalleme benim komşumun arabasına benim kasabımın camlarına yapılan bir saldırıdır. İçinde gram insanlık varsa kaynağını göstermeme rağmen yani eklememe rağmen bu maddeyi silmezsin.
October 2021
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite block
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 18:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Fullstackdev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What do you mean by national ethnic advocacy? Please write the article I added that caused you to make this accusation. The changes I have made are also valid on the Wikipedia Turkish page. I want to know the reason for your strong reaction. What is the reason for this unconstructive behavior?Fullstackdev (talk) 19:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not an unblock request. See WP:GAB to understand how to write an acceptable unblock request. Note that the Turkish Wikipedia is a separate project with separate rules. Yamla (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I don't understand the nature of your confusion or your request otherwise. But ethno-national is the exact phrase I used. El_C 19:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
(talk) 20:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)@El C: What I want from you is what post is causing you to block me indefinitely.and I'm asking for policy information on which wikipedia policy this is against. Is it a nationalist movement for me to add an article with only Turkish sources to an article created with only Armenian sources? Why do you think the source and content I have added has a devastating effect on the article? What evidence do you have for this? I want you to send my articles that caused me to be suspended indefinitely.Fullstackdev (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
@El C: This action you have made makes me think that you are directed to an error. If you check this link, you can see that the propaganda accuser has created articles professionally. After seeing this twitter post, I did a little research.I saw that all of the articles were written with Armenian sources, and I understood that they had a one-sided point of view.So I added to the article with a Turkish source. and you immediately suspended me indefinitely. Is this a coincidence?
Fullstackdev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What I want from you is what post is causing you to block me indefinitely.and I'm asking for policy information on which wikipedia policy this is against. Is it a nationalist movement for me to add an article with only Turkish sources to an article created with only Armenian sources? Why do you think the source and content I have added has a devastating effect on the article? What evidence do you have for this? I want you to send my articles that caused me to be suspended indefinitely.
Decline reason:
Please do not continue to use the block appeal template to continue a discussion; simply post your questions/comments on this talk page and sign with four tildes (~~~~). As Yamla requested above, please review WP:GAB before posting another appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock reviewed |1= I have not committed any policy violations. I've added a source to the changes I've made. I believe that I have been utterly prejudiced and indefinitely removed.The changes I have made are the changes that exist in the Turkish section, which is a wikipedia subpage, and are not against the policy.wikipedia general policies apply to all languages.I want my sentence lifted. }}
(talk page watcher) You've been edit-warring in 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement, diffs: [1], [2]. Not only it's a very contentious topic and article, but your edits weren't just reverts, they were reverts of reverts with no good reason. Keep in mind that it still counts as edit-war if you re-revert with no valid reason (which you did both times), and you don't have to brake WP:3RR for that to be counted as an edit-war. You were asked to discuss in talk and seek consensus, as there was actually an ongoing discussion and an AfD for it, but that didn't stop you from re-reverting newly added disputed content and edit-warring.
Secondly, you've added partisan revisionist sources [3], [4] which directly contradict to the article's reliable sources, published by HarperCollins and Britannica among other RS sources. Furthermore, your second 'source' spouts basic Turkish gov. propaganda nonsense, such as calling the Armenian genocide "the Armenian problem" (common denialistic talking point), and your text shifted the blame for it to the Armenian political party of that time Hunchakian, clear case of WP:DISRUPTION.
Last but certainly not least, your entire comment here is casting racial and ethnic aspersions on Armenians. Your quotes:
I think the Armenians who lost the war in Karabakh think that they will win with wikipedia special forces. Armenians are chasing a dream again. On many pages on Wikipedia, I see only articles created with Armenian sources.
All your propaganda efforts will be in vain. It is a war indemnity given by Armenia for losing the Zangezur Corridor at the end of the 44-day war. You should get used to it by now.
Your ban is very much warranted, and you're clearly WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 20:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
@ZaniGiovanni: The information I have added is the opinion of the Turkish side. The fact that the article was written entirely by Armenian sources is nothing but the dictation of a one-sided view. If you don't see the Turkish government as a reliable source. On the other hand, it is quite natural that the articles of the Armenian writers are not considered reliable. If Wikipedia is not a platform that reflects only Armenian views, what you have done is wrong and against wikipedia's biased viewpoint policy. And I still agree. Even now you don't accept the agreement signed by your president even though you lost the war. Today, you don't even hesitate to show the groups you created to make this disinformation on Twitter. Rest assured, I will review your articles one by one and add resources. First of all, I will have my unjust punishment lifted. If necessary, I will go to the Arbcom.Fullstackdev (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC) @El C: , @Yamla: I'm waiting an answer from you.
- I owe you no answers. Review WP:GAB and then make an unblock request if you wish someone to review your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 20:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- How does a new account know about ArbCom, hmmm? Secondly, if you continue saying Armenian genocide denial is just “Turkish side”, then there is nothing to discuss here, and clearly you're missing the point.
On the other hand, it is quite natural that the articles of the Armenian writers are not considered reliable
– ah yes of course, lol. Those "Armenian writers" are published by reliable publications such as Oxford press, Britannica and HarperCollins, while your added source(s) is just straight up either Turkish government propaganda regarding the Armenian genocide or just denialistic nonsense. But judging by your comments in talk pages, your WP:COI is too high to understand this.Even now you don't accept the agreement signed by your president even though you lost the war. Today, you don't even hesitate to show the groups you created to make this disinformation on Twitter.
– Stop spouting nonsense, you don't understand half the things you're saying. For reviewing admins, Fullstackdev here talks about the concept/non-existing “corridor” Zangezur corridor, and tries to present it as a reality. Wikipedia isn't a place for your original thoughts. And why are you linking random tweets of children, and how does that in any way relate to your block? What a weird day... ZaniGiovanni (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fullstackdev, please stop repeatedly pinging me to this page. Your appeal rights were explained to you by two different admins already. If a (3rd) reviewing admin needs me to clarify anything to them, I'm happy to do so, but absent that, I have nothing further to add at this time. El_C 21:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- @El C: Frankly, there is nothing you can explain.There is no vandalism. You blocked me for adding Turkish source. You are blocked because you wrote this article here, you cannot write. because you made a mistake and you can't go back. Send me my article that caused me to be suspended indefinitely. and tell me which policy of wikipedia it is against. otherwise I will assume you are in violation of policy. Gaming the systemFullstackdev (talk) 21:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fullstackdev, if
there is nothing [I] can explain
, why do you still ping me to this page, even after I asked to stop doing so? El_C 21:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC) - You weren't banned for adding denialist sources and text. Did you magically forget about your re-revert edit-wars with subpar edit descritpions/reason, and disgusting ethnic comments about Armenians and Armenian editors? Did you bother to look at your ban reason? And somehow, a new account like you not only is familiar with ArbCom, but also knows guidelines such as WP:GAME (and inappropriately uses them). Who are you? ZaniGiovanni (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fullstackdev, if
@El C: Why did you block my account unlimitedly based on what policy? you cannot answer that. Because you did it in an arbitrary move. @ZaniGiovanni: Stop making personal attacks on me. The comments I have made are the summary of the situation you are in. You have been defeated by the Turks again and you are making distortions again. Saying this is not racist. This is history itself.Fullstackdev (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
- You've socked on your home wiki. Don't try that stunt here.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)