User talk:GMH Melbourne/Archive 2024

2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

Pop up links

Yesterday's main page had an atticle on the House of Habsburg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Habsburg). When hovering over the link to "Holy Roman Empire" in the third papagraph, a complexity weird pop up appeared about non existent organisations and people. Today it has been fixed, but I took a screen shot of it. The link though when clicked was to the real wiki Holy roman empire page.

How do these pop ups work? Yesterday I thought I would try to fix it but obviously that has now been done. But i am interested anyway

Thanks Virgobeach (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, GMH Melbourne!

Happy New Year!

GMH Melbourne,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alphington Paper Mill

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alphington Paper Mill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 04:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alphington Paper Mill

The article Alphington Paper Mill you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Alphington Paper Mill for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lindsay Thompson Portrait.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lindsay Thompson Portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Paulie Stewart moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Paulie Stewart. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and see WP:MUSICBIO for what constitutes notability for a music biography. All four references fail WP:IS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

@UtherSRG: I have moved the article back to mainspace. At least 2 of the 4 sources are independent of the subject (SMH & The Guardian). If this isn't sufficient, there are other sources that exist ( [1] [2] [3] & more ). If you still believe that isn't sufficient to meet GNG, I suggest taking it to AfD. GMH Melbourne (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Did you read those two sources? They include interview material and, as such, are not WP:IS. See WP:MUSICBIO and I will indeed go to AFD. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Also, the purpose of draft space is to give time for an article to get made with adequate sources before being moved into main article space. If you have additional sources, they should be added to the draft before it is made into an article. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

I thought I'd let you know that this article you moved to main space twice is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulie Stewart. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, GMH Melbourne. I'm just posting to let you know that List of chief commissioners of the Victoria Police – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 16. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash

On 18 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Lockheed EC-130Q aircraft crashed after performing a waterbombing just 190 feet (58 m) in the air? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 00:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,814 views (742.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Npp

@GMH Melbourne Patrol the page Fisayomi Abebi Thanks. Jutos222 (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Monique Ryan

Hi GMH, I'd love to get your advice on something if possible. I recently put Monique Ryan up as a FAC, which was not successful.

One of the comments that was made was that The 'Member of Parliament' section is rather bitsy, and jumps from issue to issue. It would be better to discuss how Ryan has positioned herself as an MP, including her overall voting record rather than listing various issues of at times unclear importance (for instance, on what types of issues does she side with the government and on what does she side with the the opposition? Has she successfully influenced government policy?)

I'm not really sure how to rework the "Member of Parliament" section to make this change. The trouble with writing about independent MPs is that they take public positions on a huge variety of things, and so putting their statements chronologically would mean jumping between lots of topics. Writing about government MPs seems much easier as you can't attribute decisions of a government solely to them, so ordering chronologically is fine. Grouping Ryan's statements by topic seems to me to make more sense, but it still makes it a bit choppy.

Do you have any advice about how to restructure the Member of Parliament section? Any thoughts are appreciated and totally fine if you're not sure!

GraziePrego (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I would suggest perhaps rewriting the Member of Parliament section to be a chronological biography of her time in parliament and maybe have a seperate section on her political views. I would also recommend a Peer Review as you'll be able to get many people nitpicking on the finer details to get the article near-perfect. There are also a few articles (here) that are Australian political biographies and FA status which can provide you with a bit of a structure/ guide on the best way to do this. GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Great thank you :) GraziePrego (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash

The article 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash and Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 12:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash

The article 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash for comments about the article, and Talk:2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

@Z1720: Thank you for taking the time to review and for all your work and helpful suggestions! GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet

Hello, GMH Melbourne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1840s in Mauritius

A tag has been placed on Category:1840s in Mauritius indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello GMH Melbourne,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Amelia Hamer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amelia Hamer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Hamer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion

I must apologise to you @GMH Melbourne- I mentioned Hamer in the discussion for deletion of Alex Bhathal, (also nominated by AusLondoner). Because of this, they immediately nominated Hamer for deletion as well. I recently created Alex Bhathal and I very much think her article should be kept- I only mentioned Hamer as an example of how a candidate can be notable enough to keep. The deletion discussion for Bhathal is ongoing. GraziePrego (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@GraziePrego: Hello, no need to apologise, I understand where AusLondonder is coming from. WP:NPOLITICIAN states that unelected candidates aren't inherently notable, which is the case here. But if the articles meet GNG, then they are 'notable' outside of the requirements of NPOLITICIAN and hopefully the community discussion should result in a keep outcome. GMH Melbourne (talk) 06:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @GMH Melbourne, glad there's no hard feelings. Happy to see what others think. AusLondonder (talk) 06:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I should also say no hard feelings from me to you either @AusLondonder, we’re all here to make Wikipedia better :) totally respect your nominations. GraziePrego (talk) 08:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Matthew Charles Johnson

Hello! Your submission of Matthew Charles Johnson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review

Thanks for your through and detailed good article review of John Tonkin. You did well! I hope for List of premiers of Victoria to be promoted at FLC soon. You now have 2 supports which might be enough. Steelkamp (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of List of premiers of Victoria

Congratulations, GMH Melbourne! The list you nominated, List of premiers of Victoria, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

ndash and mdash

Re: [4]

Hello. The article you edited uses ndash and mdash instead of the actual characters for clarity of coding. Depending on the font (and depending on one's visual acuity), it can be difficult to tell the difference between -, –, and —. The price of this clarity is a few additional characters in the wikitext.

Unless you can cite a guideline that discourages this practice, please do not make this kind of edit. I have restored the ndashes and mdashes at that article. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 15:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

@Mandruss: Sorry for the error, this was a bot-assisted edit (m:User:TMg/autoFormatter#Character entity references). I agree that code is more practicable in this situation. I will be more careful next time around. GMH Melbourne (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

I have requested that that script be changed to remove this type of edit, but I'm not optimistic. Being more careful may have to suffice. ―Mandruss ☎ 16:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Rollback on London 03.06.17

Hi there! I started to edit the page on the Aphex Twin release London 03.06.17 and added a new section about the background of the record (being released at the festival, etc) since the article is a stub right now, however I noticed you rolled back those changes. I thought the edits were constructive and I don't understand why they were rolled back. I am new to editing Wikipedia, so I'm sorry if my edit wasn't actually constructive! Beachweak (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

@Beachweak: Sorry about that, I was patrolling recent edits to try and undo vandalism and from the interface I was using (which is different from the normal interface) your edit must have appeared to be vandalism. This was of course an error and I apologise. I have undone my undo. Thank you for your edits! GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

All good, thank you for the explanation, have a good day! Beachweak (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Reverted draftifications

Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reversed your draftification of John Jaycee Cuijpers, Gabriel & Co., Stadionul Soda, and Gary L. Coleman. I did so because articles older than 90 days should not be draftified without prior consensus at AfD, per the result of this RfC. Please be mindful of this when moving pages to draft space in the future. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: Hello, not a problem, I have now PRODed them. Sorry for the inconvenience. Because the RfD says 'too old' and isn't really clear about the '90 days' rule, I assumed it was ok to draftify them as they hadn't been reviewed yet. Again, sorry for the trouble. GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

No worries, I usually end up telling one or two editors a week about this, as it's really only written down in WP:DRAFTIFY, which is an essay itself and not policy. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Aida Vee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aida Vee, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aida Vee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, GMH Melbourne. I'm just posting to let you know that List of premiers of Victoria – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 7. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Matthew Charles Johnson

On 26 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Charles Johnson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the "trial from hell" Matthew Charles Johnson and his co-accused hurled abuse at the judge and threw human excrement at a member of the jury? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Charles Johnson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Charles Johnson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,062 views (710.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Free content from State Government of Victoria

A tag has been placed on Category:Free content from State Government of Victoria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to GMH Melbourne for accumulating at least 100 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

GA review circle

Hey! This is The Sharpest Lives (talk · contribs). Earlier, you invited me to your GA review circle. I just wanted to say- great idea! I hope it works out and helps facilitate many GA reviews to come. The Sharpest Lives (the deadliest to lead) 16:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your encourangement! GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Brad Banducci

On 10 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brad Banducci, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that starting at age 16, future Woolworths CEO Brad Banducci was named top sewing machine salesperson three years in a row? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brad Banducci. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brad Banducci), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Matthew Charles Johnson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matthew Charles Johnson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Matthew Charles Johnson

The article Matthew Charles Johnson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson and Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 07:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding WP:GARC

Hi @GMH Melbourne! I was wondering if there's a limit for how many articles one person can list at the review circles; I have a few GANs that I'd like cleared sometime, and I feel as if there's some current stagnation with how many participants there are. I've already finished my preliminary review for Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album), and I'm just waiting for the nominator to get back to me so I can continue reviewing their fixes. Just need an indication of whether listing another one of my GANs for review would be considered greedy or not.

Also, I want to reiterate that I think this is a wonderful idea, and that it should be promoted a bit more - I think it'll help a lot in clearing out the backlog. joeyquism (talk page) 07:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, @Joeyquism, the aim of GARC is to reduce the GAN backlog and wait times so feel free to add more articles to the pool! Keep in mind though that the process is still being trialled and I have stopped advertising the page so it might take a little while for you to be paired in a circle. Thank you for your contributions to the process thus far and don't hesitate to drop me anymore questions feedback you may have! GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:36, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the clarification! I think I'll drop one more in within the next week or so after I (hopefully) complete my existing review. joeyquism (talk page) 07:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Matthew Charles Johnson

The article Matthew Charles Johnson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson for comments about the article, and Talk:Matthew Charles Johnson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 08:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thank you for starting WP:GARC! What an elegant solution to a problem that has been plaguing the Good Article process for some time. Here's to hoping it will continue to develop in the future. Fritzmann (message me) 10:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! I should have my review for Hypericum huber-morathii completed by tomorrow (AEST). GMH Melbourne (talk) 10:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Matthew Charles Johnson

Hi GMH Melbourne, I've now finished my copy-edit. I found there is a fair bit of uncited text in the section "Criminal history". I also noted some uncited direct quotations within that section. I have marked these texts with [citation needed] tags. Because this is a Good Article and a biography of a living person, we must be mindful to properly cite texts. Per good article criteria, good articles are required to comply with BLP.

I also noticed two primary sources are used; one is the judgement in the case of Williams' murder from the Supreme Court of Victoria; the other is the investigation into Corrections Victoria relating to Williams' death. According to WP:BLPPRIMARY, court records and transcripts are not supposed to be used as refs in articles; these should be replaced with, or at least augmented with, secondary sources. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Africa Social Impact Summit

Hi GMH Melbourne, trust this finds you well. I was wondering how long it would take for the above page to be reviewed, so I wanted to discuss it with you. The page was created about 8 weeks ago, it is ready and would need to be looked into by a reviewer. Thank you. Nnamdi93 (talk) 13:31, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Asking for help with an issue

Hi sorry if i am bothering would you mind if i asked you for help with something ? Friendlyhistorian (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@Friendlyhistorian: Sure, how can I help? GMH Melbourne (talk) 11:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule

Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule
Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed. We plan to use the following schedule: Oct 8 – Oct 14: Candidate sign-up Oct 22 – Oct 24: Discussion phase Oct 25 – Oct 31: SecurePoll voting phase If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections. If you are interested in helping out, please post at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections § Ways to help. There are many redlinked subpages that can be created.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Free content from The White House

A tag has been placed on Category:Free content from The White House indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Australian Collaboration of the Month

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Australian Collaboration of the Month, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to GMH Melbourne for accumulating at least 25 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

• October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
• October 22–24 - Discussion phase
• October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

• The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
• Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
• The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
• The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
• Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)