Wikipedia

Gary Joseph

Joined 15 May 2005
Latest comment: 8 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom elections are now open!

Welcome!

Hello Gary Joseph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dominick 02:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

???

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry, I don't understand your comment on my talk page. I'm guessing it is about List of largest suspension bridges but you mention a category. I'm baffled. -- Samuel Wantman 04:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Template talk:Infobox Commercial Ship

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As you may know, there are a variety of infobox templates used for ocean liners; at least one of which is ill-suited to passenger vessels. As a consequence of a discussion with User:Ebyabe at User_talk:Ebyabe#RMS_Queen_Mary, Ebyabe has generously agreed to create a template for passenger vessels. It appears at Template:Infobox Commercial Ship. Its creator needs assistance with the fields for the template. Given your interest in this area, would you be willing to particpate in the project? If so, go to Template talk:Infobox Commercial Ship and weigh in. It may be that different templates are needed for passenger ships (gt), freighters (dwt, net), containerships (TEU) and that one size will not fit all. Would you be interested in participating in this project? We need more input. Thank you. Kablammo 01:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ireland article, the flags

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

That's exactly what I mean, and you seem to be agreeing that the flag section should go, so I don't understand why you voted disagree. --Red King 21:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Help with image

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for your note-- I don't know what is going on with the image and I haven't yet ventured into that area of editing. You might want to ask one of the contributors of images-- One was recently made an administrator; perhaps he could help you. Here's his talk page: User_talk:Rklawton. I haven't worked with him but he appears to have a lot of knowledge in this area. Good luck. Kablammo 13:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Architecture

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello and welcome to the wikiproject - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards --Mcginnly | Natter 19:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Architecture Bulletin  
 

A new Historic houses task force has been created.

Please join if you are interested!

Announcements - please add your Project announcements  


Articles at Peer Review - edit list
Machu Picchu
Manor House, Sleaford
Endeavour House
Taliesin (studio)
New article announcements - add new architecture article to list
Articles related to architecture over the past two weeks are listed automatically by AlexNewArtBot.

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2024-11-16 19:09 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.


DYK announcements - add new architecture article to list
New participants (add me)
Jpboudin, Mayarrow, Nwhysel, Cassianto, Jtmorgan
This template will be updated regularly. If you would rather not receive this bulletin, just delete it from your talk page.

Burj Dubai

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding the Burj Dubai if you see something that need fixing than Be bold and do it. If the article is being actively edited (check the history for recent edits) then unless there's an absolutely glaring error, it's usually good manners to discuss changes on the talk page. If you don't get a response in a few days, go ahead and make your changes. --Joopercoopers 08:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Citation help

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can you add a citation for this edit. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 06:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Interestingly, I wanted to become an Architect but my father (ex Navy) talked me into Naval Architecture. Small world! I used to work for Kvaerner ... now Aker and am quite familiar with Cruise Ships & Ferries. If I can help out with any of your research, just let me know. Jmvolc (talk) 01:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Freedom-Class_Comparison.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Could you possibly upload the vector version of this. I'd like to try changing the 747-statue-train to be a shade of red so that they all clearly contrast against the ship. In the small thumbnail shown on the article, it's not possible to clearly discern the ship super-structure from the statue. —Sladen (talk) 21:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you had any luck with finding the vector of the image? —Sladen (talk) 21:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hey,
I was able to edit the image and upload it, overwriting the existing file. I had originally save the unedited file as a .svg, but since I do not have software to be able to view it, I was not confident that it looked okay. Nonetheless, please accept my apologies for taking so long to get this done.
Leave me a message if the upload does not work.Gary Joseph (talk) 07:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Brilliant; the new picture really stands out in red. I haven't been able to find the SVG/CorelDraw "source-code", I tried guessing Image:Freedom-Class_Comparison.svg. If the original was done in CorelDraw, then it'd probably be best to upload the original in that format as well as the bitmap (and put links on each of the uploads that they relate to the other). If you have a copy of Firefox handy, that will load/view SVG files. My main hope is that we can have the vector copy somewhere in the system. Alternatively, if you're working out what to do, if you send me what you've got and I'll try to figure out what to do with it. Once again, thank you sticking at this after so long! You have my appreciations. —Sladen (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Titanic

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Be bold, Gary. If you think your edit would be an improvement I would advise you to go ahead and edit the article and see if anyone objects. Eroica 11:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Liberty of the Seas

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I only changed it because of a previous change to one of the other Freedom Class ships. I will revert it now along with the other.Michael Merali 01:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Freedom of the Seas

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

The Queen Mary 2, to my knowledge, also doubles as a cruise-liner (from Ft. Lauderdale during the winter-time); hence the reason why I inserted the statistic. As for the comparison image, couldn't it be easier simply to contact the company/person in question and ask for permissions? I tried that on the Liberty of the Seas article, and it turns out that it worked. The comparison image would be a great addition to the article.Michael Merali 15:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Have you tried saving the comparison image to a different format then uploading?Michael Merali 15:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Its very good. The only suggestion I can give for it is have the Statue of Liberty over on its side. Generally, when size comparison is done with a building versus ship, the building will be placed on its side. Just a thought, but it's fine as is. Michael Merali 18:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you were trying to show the Statue of Liberty for height; however, you also do have a point on the overall amount of things that would be on the picture would be way too many if we were to add buildings on their sides as well. The best thing, I think at the moment, is to just leave it as is. Michael Merali 22:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Nabucco Gas Pipeline-en.svg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, I was reading the article on the pipeline and looked at the map ici that you created. I noticed a few things to correct but could not because of technical issues. My software, CorelDraw, gives me errors for object IDs. If you can make the changes, I can tell you what they are. You can leave me a message here Merci. Gary

Hi Gary,
This file seems created by Ahruman, but as I've made the original (in French), I think I can modify it. Please tell me how I can improve it.
Sémhur 11:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello again. Thanks for getting back so fast. There are some corrections to be made on the map. It is missing Montenegro. The "Mediterranean sea" should be "Mediterranean Sea". The Caspian Sea is spelled incorrectly (as Caspain Sea). These were the only things I saw that were technically incorrect.
I also have some graphic suggestions that are really unnecessary, but might help. You can use your discretion. I would suggest making the country names smaller. On my map I made them 12 points so they all fit inside the countries. I made "Czech Republic" into paragraph text so it can fit too. I used Tahoma for the body of water labels since serif fonts don't always read well. I also changed the city tags to orange so they contrast slightly from the background. I can email you a JPEG of the file that I had completed if you need a representation. Thanks again. 207.229.164.68 (d) 14 juillet 2009 à 13:35 (CEST)
  Done. I prefer to keep "big" texts size, with that the map can be read even in a Wikipedia article. The fonts are now DejaVu Sans Condensed and DejaVu Serif Condensed. Before, we (the French Graphic Lab) used Arial and Times New Roman, but these fonts are not free, and when the Wikimedia Fondation changed its servers to run under Unix, their rendering were bad (as my English this evening). After several weeks of research, we have found that the DejaVu Condensed have the best rendering, even after the SVG to PNG transformation. I also change the colors to the standard (grey for the "other countries", and the blue of the sea is a little more saturated). Sémhur 18:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

RE: Australia

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey there. Yes, I concur with your stance -- thanks for your praise. I suppose the advantage of the recently-changed lead is that the 'island' claim is absent from it, while other major sources (Britannica, National Geographic) are cited in support of the 'continent' claim (which, in and of itself, says something about the commonality of the notion); as well, shunting the claim down to a later section may mollify those who may insist on retaining the claim in the article (as it is referenced), while somewhat deprecating it and not giving the claim its former prominence. Since those edits were made, which seem to have made the content more balanced, they have not been changed, so perhaps that's a good sign? I also have little interest in fighting or being the torch-bearer on this point, as I have more important things to do with my time, but I would be prepared to nominate the article for a featured article review if those 'ownership' issues continue to compromise article neutrality. Thoughts? In any event, thanks for your efforts. Bosonic dressing (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gary_Joseph&oldid=691995957"