Photo Request

edit

Hi Gaz, I am currently looking for an image of the Gateway Bridge Brisbane, and I stumbled accross your picture on Wikipedia. I would really like this image in a high res format that is suitable for print. If possible could you email me a copy of this? Falcon1978 06:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

What end use do plan for the image? Commercial/personal/etc? - Gaz 15:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Archive 1


Well just to tell you thanks for your comments on Wikipedia:Featured_pictures_candidates --Chmouel Boudjnah


I've replied to you over at my talk page - Chrism 17:51, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

image syntax

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AExtended_image_syntax

so you can stop posting 2 images, and stop ruining names with pixel information esaily obtainable from the file itself.

APEC

edit

I just went by how their official website listed these countries. They used the conventional short form for all of them except for Brunei, China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. This especially matters for the latter two since the name they used (especially in the case of "Chinese Taipei") would determine whether they would allowed to become a member. The "Republic of China" would never be allowed to become a member - only Chinese Taipei would. Our footer needs to reflect that. And since listed the names used by APEC for Hong Kong and the two Chinas, we might as well do so for Brunei, for consistency sake. --Jiang 18:59, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

As I see, you are directly responsible for this article having been created — I was nonplussed to see Adam Carr, whose interests seem to be more in the political articles, has written it. Good call!

But now... we need a picture of the beast, of course! I haven't found any non-copyrighted ones on the web: how about a weekend trip to Tasmania and donating Wikipedia a handful of nice pictures of the Spotted Quoll?

(Only half joking — my experiences with asking for permission for other pictures have been so far unsuccessful, so I fear this would actually be the easiest way to get one :-)

Lupo 19:40, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Gaz. Looks fine as-is to me. But I'm brain-dead today. I (perhaps rather foolishly) volunteered to code the HTML of a reasonably extensive web page for a landcare group recently. Haven't done any serious HTML for quite a while. Very rusty. Been working on it most of the weekend. Eyes falling out, brain fuzzy, could get quite serious about a beer or two, some gentle excercise, and some sleep. Adrian User:Apingstone is the main man for images. But you already know that. Best. Tannin (Oh, and I put "Australia" rather than somewhere more specific because I have taken to travelling a lot lately. Next month - I hope - WA. Only state I've never been to. But the indecision is killing me. It's been raining up the Cooper and for he first time in a long while the Channel Country wetlands will be in full of life and growth. I shouldn't miss that opportunity. But I fear it's not practicable without 4WD.)

Hi Gaz,
I'm just wondering what exposure/aperture/settings you used for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg
Another Gaz


DSCN4786.JPG (aka BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg)
CAMERA       : E5700V1.1
METERING     : MATRIX
MODE         : M
SHUTTER      : 8.00sec
APERTURE     : F3.1
EXP +/-      : 0.0
FOCAL LENGTH : f14.7mm(X1.0)
IMG ADJUST   : AUTO
SENSITIVITY  : AUTO
WHITEBAL     : AUTO
SHARPNESS    : AUTO
DATE         : 2004.03.12 19:28
QUALITY      : 2560x1920 FINE
SATURATION   : 0
FOCUS AREA   : CENTER

Yeah. I looked at it again after I corrected it by reflex and thought ... er ... Nope, it was right the first time. Revert away! Or I will. (I got distracted by other topics just now.) Tannin


A request

edit

Gary - do you have higher resolution versions of Image:Great Ocean Road 1.jpg and Image:Great Ocean Road 2.jpg? I *love* them, and I'd like to nominate them on the featured pics, but I think a larger version would help. →Raul654 19:26, May 5, 2004 (UTC)

Transcriber

edit

Transcriber [1] is the same as transcriptionist, and I intended it to include both people willing to notate music and type up audio, if the need for either should ever arrive. A list of polylinguists would be great, but I am not one. Hyacinth 20:27, 11 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Sunset

edit

Holy cow. I'll wait a little bit to avoid overwhelming FPC with weather photos, but both your excellent photo and the other shot on sunset are stunning illustrations--I've seen nice sunset photos before, but these are really exceptional! If I forget to nominate in timely manner, please nominate them yourself and I'll happily vote them up -- excellent work! Jwrosenzweig 17:10, 13 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

John Hancock Center

edit

I was unable to find copyright information on Image:John Hancock Center (Boston) daytime.jpg. Because of this, I have listed it and others on Wikipedia:Images for deletion. I have uploaded a replacement photo called Image:John Hancock Center (Boston) daytime 2.jpg. Just letting you know, MattSal 22:01, May 15, 2004 (UTC)

Footers

edit

I've already started removing some of the non-geogrphaical/non-EU footers. Please help and remove the rest. It's been weeks a no one's objected. --Jiang 06:53, 19 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

WorkSux

edit

To whom it may concern...

My work load had recently risen sharply. I will log in here when I can.

If its urgent, email me. - Gaz 16:39, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Work has not abated. The only plus is that it is all solid PHP coding. - Gaz 02:54, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)


Image license

edit

Hi,

Your image Image:Dominoes.jpg is currently used in the wikipedia repository of free images Wikipedia:List_of_images, but doesn't actually have proper licensing information attached to it. Would you mind adding a license tag to it? Thanks, Wilke 21:17, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg

edit

Hi there! Thanks for adding the image Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg. It currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, and I was hoping that you would add one as untagged images may be deleted eventually. (You can use {{gfdl}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks! --Diberri | Talk 18:05, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)

Hiding your recent changes bookmarklet

edit

I noticed that you requested the ability to hide your changes from the Watchlist. I wrote a bookmarklet that does this; it's on my page. Freel free to check it out. If it doesn't work, please let me know and I'll try to fix it. JesseW 08:05, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Image:AustNationalHwyMap.png

edit

Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:AustNationalHwyMap.png. You mentioned that you got permission from the webmaster. Do you know if the webmaster gave permission only for Wikipedia to use, with no third-party use allowed, or if he gave permission for it to be licensed under the GFDL so that Wikipedia could use it? Thanks, Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 14:17, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)

United States Army Air Service

edit

This article is in Spanish (I think, its definatly some foreign language) though I'm not sure how to move it across to there.

RFC pages on VfD

edit

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:43, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

edit

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

FPRC

edit

I don't know if you are aware but one of your pictures is currently on FPRC. BrokenSegue 00:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Pic of the day

edit

Hi Gaz,

Just to let you know that your photo Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg is due to make a reappearance on Pic of the Day on the 21st May. I've used the same caption as last time, but you can make any changes at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/May 21, 2005. -- Solipsist 20:49, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

...and Image:Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg is coming up again on the 31st May, with the caption at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/May 31, 2005. -- Solipsist 16:49, 25 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Dominoes

edit

Hi Gaz. I love your photo Image:Dominoes.jpg! You wrote that the original version is 2560x1920. It would be wonderful if you could upload it (with the same name). Thanks! dbenbenn | talk 23:21, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Use of Brisbane image

edit

Hi Gary,

Just wanted to let you know I've used your image of Brisbane at night for the screenshot of the 0.1.8 release of my image editor Seashore. The screenshot for the program changes every release. I'm pretty sure the licensing details are correct. You can veiw the screenshot here.

Cedars 02:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane Image

edit

Gaz, leave the image I've uploaded onto the Brisbane wiki. Your's is outdated and doesn't do the city justice.

Request

edit

Hi Gaz,

My name is Fernanda Viégas and I have been studying Wikipedia for a while now (you can see a paper I published on the subject here). I would like to ask you a few questions about your activities as a Wikipedia image creator. I am fascinated by the pictorial side of Wikipedia and it would be great to hear about this community from one of its members. Would you be available to participate an email survey this week? Thanks, — Fernanda 03:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | talkReply

Hi again, Gaz. I have started sending out the questionnaire to participants in the study and it would be great if you could participate too. If you'd like to get in touch with me via email, please use the "Email this user" feature on my page. Thanks! — Fernanda 21:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | talkReply

file Wedding_planner_movie_poster.jpg

edit

Hi, Dear Administrator! Please, let to delete this file: Wedding_planner_movie_poster.jpg (uploaded by me), because already exist Wplanner.jpg . Sorry for disturbing and thanx. Greating from fair Poland in Europa. Zboralski 00:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:190px-Greece-Cat.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:190px-Greece-Cat.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Great Ocean Road 1.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Great Ocean Road 1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Great Ocean Road 2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Great Ocean Road 2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply


Help

edit

Can you please help me by reviewing my article HSV Senator Signature it would help me alot.Senators 07:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

FP delisting nomination

edit

Hello, I have nominated Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg for delisting from WP:FP. You can join the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:BrisbaneByNight2004.jpg. --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:WilsonsPromLightstation750.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:WilsonsPromLightstation750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 10:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:WilsonsPromLighthouse750.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:WilsonsPromLighthouse750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 10:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane meetup

edit
  Brisbane Meetup

 
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Giggabot (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:UQ-SteeleBldg.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:UQ-SteeleBldg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane meetup invitation

edit
  Brisbane Meetup

 
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!

Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC).Reply

Image source problem with Image:AlbertBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AlbertBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:CentenaryBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CentenaryBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:JackPeschBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:JackPeschBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:StoryBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:StoryBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:VictoriaBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:VictoriaBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:WalterTaylorBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:WalterTaylorBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:WilliamJollyBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:WilliamJollyBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:MerivaleBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:StoryBridgeByNight800.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:StoryBridgeByNight800.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:GatewayBridge800.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:GatewayBridge800.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:CaptainCookBridge.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:CaptainCookBridge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Huddled-Gaz.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Huddled-Gaz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Huddled.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Huddled.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:24, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Santorini-mod-Gaz.jpg

edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Santorini-mod-Gaz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC) --SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:PointCartwright.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:PointCartwright.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:NormanBay750.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NormanBay750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:SouthEastPoint750.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:SouthEastPoint750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:WhaleRock750.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:WhaleRock750.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:StrelitziaReginaeFlower.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:StrelitziaReginaeFlower.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Home-icon.png

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Home-icon.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Clock-UTC.png

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Clock-UTC.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane meetup invitation

edit
  Brisbane Meetup

 
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a barbeque and meetup at Southbank this Sunday (26 June). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

edit

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:MooloolabaSkyline.jpg needs authorship information

edit
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:MooloolabaSkyline.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Gaz~enwiki}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
  • If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane workshop and meetup invitation

edit
  Brisbane Meetup

 
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a series of Paralympic History workshops and a meetup next Saturday (26 May) and Sunday. In attendance will be University of Queensland faculty and Australian Paralympic Committee staff. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/5. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane)

Brisbane meetup invitation

edit
  Brisbane Meetup
Next: 3 August 2012 - Dinner
Last: 26 May 2012 - Dinner @ Southbank

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup this Friday evening (3 August). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/6. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 01:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Brisbane)

Notice of change

edit

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

edit

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TwelveApostles-Gaz.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --65.130.202.239 (talk) 00:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane meetup with Sue Gardner invitation

edit
  Brisbane Meetup
Next: 11 February 2013 5-8PM - Drinks and light dinner at SLQ with Sue Gardner
Last: 3 August 2012

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 Febrary 2013 with Sue Gardner.

Details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/7. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 10:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in SEQ)

Files missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 06:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

edit
 

Dear Gaz~enwiki,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 08:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

00:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

13:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Brisbane Meetup

edit

Hi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated on your userpage that you're a Wikipedian in the Brisbane area. Assuming significant interest, I'm organising an event for August 22 at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for you to come along. A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/8. Hope to see you there! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane Meetup in January 2016

edit

Hi there! I'm dropping you this notice as you've indicated on your userpage that you're a Wikipedian in the Brisbane area. To celebrate fifteen years of Wikipedia, we are holding a celebration in Brisbane on the 16th of January and you are invited! For further information, and to register your interest, please see our meetup page. Hope to see you there!

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery.

Please claim your upload(s) : File:GreatOceanRoad1-Gaz.jpg

edit

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please claim your upload(s): File:GreatOceanRoad2-Gaz.jpg

edit

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


Brisbane meetup - Sunday 10 December 2017 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland

edit

If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Brisbane meetup: Saturday 13 January 2018 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland

edit
  Brisbane Meetup

 
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Saturday 13 January 2018 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there!