User talk:GeneralPoxter/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome!

Hello, GeneralPoxter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sir Bob Ukachukwu Theeves, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 02:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sir Bob Ukachukwu Theeves

The article Sir Bob Ukachukwu Theeves has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 02:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bob Ukachukwu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bob Ukachukwu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 02:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sir Bob Ukachukwu Theeves

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sir Bob Ukachukwu Theeves, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wywyit (talk) 02:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Tony Tan. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, PACTF, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tony Tan · talk 03:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christ Blessing (Bellini, c. 1500) (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christ Blessing (Bellini, c. 1500) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christ Blessing (Bellini, c. 1500), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, GeneralPoxter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christ Blessing (Bellini, 1500) has been accepted

Christ Blessing (Bellini, 1500), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Saints

You need to read MOS:SAINTS, although it does not cover all eventualities. In general WP avoids "St." except where it is normally used in place or church names etc. Use "St" or "Saint". Johnbod (talk) 03:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coresus Sacrificing himself to Save Callirhoe has been accepted

Coresus Sacrificing himself to Save Callirhoe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The See-Saw has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The See-Saw. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 21:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Triumphal Symphony (Smetana)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Triumphal Symphony (Smetana) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ad Parnassum (Klee) (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ad Parnassum (Klee) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ad Parnassum (Klee), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, GeneralPoxter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello GeneralPoxter and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ad Parnassum (Klee) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ad Parnassum (Klee). Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 14:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dog Barking at the Moon (Miró) has been accepted

Dog Barking at the Moon (Miró), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Painter's Daughters Chasing a Butterfly has been accepted

The Painter's Daughters Chasing a Butterfly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dynamism of a Soccer Player (Boccioni) (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dynamism of a Soccer Player (Boccioni) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dynamism of a Soccer Player (Boccioni), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Editing other people's talk page comments

It is generally a bad idea to edit other people's talk page comments like you did (with Citation bot's help) here, and you appear to be doing on many talk pages. Please think about what you are doing and don't blindly make changes on talk pages.Nigel Ish (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I didn't do that. I'm afraid you got the wrong person. GeneralPoxter (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I've been going through old talk messages, and I see what I did wrong. I won't do it again. GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dynamism of a Soccer Player (Boccioni) has been accepted

Dynamism of a Soccer Player (Boccioni), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:51, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

This should never have been declined. The first reviewer wrote " The only references are to MOMA, i.e. WP:PRIMARY sources. We need WP:SECONDARY sources which talk about the painting."

I consider this a misunderstanding. The only primary source that's relevant here is the painting itself. The MOMA catalog information is a reliable secondary source from an unquestionable authoritative institution. It may have some sort ofcoi because it owns the painting, but it is nonetheless universally accepted as the basic reliable source, with the only possible more reliable source a monograph on the artist.. And since it is our practice that any painting collected by a major museum justifies an article,and since MOMA is one of theleading museums famous throught the world, nothing mroe really needs to be shown.

Please add as many moresucharticlesas youcan. But it does help to have an additional source as well, just to avoid difficulty with thos ewho may not understand. DGG ( talk ) 11:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ad Parnassum (Klee) has been accepted

Ad Parnassum (Klee), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 11:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

You appear to be a reliable editor in this field. There'sno reason why you need use draft space. Just wrtite the articles in main space--just remember that at the very first edit there most be at least one source. Of youencounter any problems, let me known on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 11:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Tagging talk pages

Hi! Thanks for your contributions. But note that the correct way to add WikiProject tags to articles is using the template, such as:

{{WikiProject Visual arts}}

This would automatically cause the talk page to be categorised in Category:WikiProject Visual arts articles.

Do not manually add

[[Category:WikiProject Visual arts articles]]

to talk pages. There exists a HotCat-like script that you may use to add these tags more easily. Cheers, SD0001 (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop setting article "importance"

I can see from your recent contribution history that you've altered the "importance" level of about 75 articles in the last couple of days, sometimes at the rate of 3 or 4 per minute. Please stop doing this and discuss it.

The assessment of article class and importance is done by experienced editors who are familiar with the Wikipedia:Content assessment project, and with the project guidelines. Please do not alter the article assessment codes on articles, until you have discussed it with members of the project. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding your recent article assessment edits. The thread is Editor altering Content assessment importance values at a fast clip. Mathglot (talk)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:31, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kebab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov)

Hello! Your submission of Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edelseider (talk) 11:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reviewing my submission for Friendly Subpeona, and the lesson on wikipedia standards for new article creation. I appreciate the feedback and will edit the subpoena article as you suggested:)Sati010 (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, GeneralPoxter. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov).
Message added 10:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, General Poxter

I appreciate your enthusiasm running for ArbCom, but please take a very close look at the WMF's requirements for access to nonpublic personal data and confirm that you're eligible to serve if elected. LINK

Best regards, —Tim ///// Carrite (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi GeneralPoxter, I also appreciate your enthusiasm, but would like to respectfully suggest that you withdraw. You do good work in article space, and I hope you keep improving the encyclopedia! As you may have gathered from the questions and comments, a lot of editors are worried about your experience, and it would be better to focus your efforts on improving the encyclopedia in ways you already have experience in. ArbCom elections are unpleasant even for editors with 5 to 10 years of experience, and you'll probably be a happier and more productive if you withdrew. Wug·a·po·des​ 08:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Good timing stepping aside fast, don't be discouraged or worry about it. Everything in good time. Good luck with your continued editing at Wikipedia and I'm sure we'll be hearing more of your name in the future. best, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 19:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Agreed with Carrite. I know it’s not much consolation, but thank you for volunteering to do a thankless job that, frankly, most Wikipedians aren’t willing to touch with a ten-foot bargepole. It takes a lot to be willing to throw your hat in the ring. Personally, I would consider it a bullet dodged that you’re withdrawn from the election now, but I’d encourage you to continue growing as an editor, put a few years worth of time in gaining the trust of the community, and you’ll stand a better chance of joining the ArbCom, if that’s your goal. OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, GeneralPoxter. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 00:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Please check your mail and respond :) TonyBallioni (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov)

Hello! Your submission of Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edelseider (talk) 13:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

You say that is customary for classical compositions' articles to keep instrumentation and structure separate, and I doubt it. Featured articles BWV 4, Messiah, Piano Concerto No. 24 (Mozart) and Requiem (Reger) (to name just a few) don't, and why separate in a short article? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Who are you talking to, Gerda? The General, or me? I said that it is customary to add a discography. A discography. Eine Diskografie. --Edelseider (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Please refer to articles concerning symphonies. Symphony No. 8 (Mahler), Symphony No. 9 (Beethoven) just to name a few. GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I indented wrong. The discogrphy wa added. First time today I heard that that is needed, - always learning. - GP, Do we have a FA article on a symphony? A guideline to say it's wanted? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I also didn't know that discography was an absolutely necessary part of a musical composition article. @Gerda Arendt: There is not exactly a guideline on this, but it is best to remain consistent within the type of composition. GeneralPoxter (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

(ec) Having looked at Mahler and Beethoven: for Mahler, I think the header "Instrumentation" is justified, because it's a serious discussion. For Beethoven - as Kalinnikov - I doubt the use of the whole section, which is only a list of instruments. - After edit conflict: feel free to call me Gerda, and no ping needed, I'm watching. Consistency is nice, but no more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

In the composer's article, zwo refs are not used, Anon.(a) and Anon.(2004), - it's probably easier for you to fix than for me. - Please: no harv-ids in Further reading, to avoid glaring error messages that theay are not used. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Approval for Thomas Speight (Mayor of Bradford)

Thank you for the very prompt approval of the draft Roger Wood (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

You are most welcome. GeneralPoxter (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Congratulations (PewDiePie song)

Hello, there! You've recently commented on my draft, Draft:Congratulations (PewDiePie song), advising for it to be merged with PewDiePie vs. T-Series. Well, I have recently found out that the topic actually already has an article (Congratulations (PewDiePie, Roomie, and Boyinaband song). So, I merged the content from my draft into that article. I tried renaming the article to "Congratulations (PewDiePie song)," although it wouldn't let me. Why is that? Is there any way I can? Melofors (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

1. You rename an article by moving it. Navigate to the "More" dropdown and you will find it there. 2. I believe the article title is good as is. There is no need to rename it as of now. GeneralPoxter (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, but renaming it isn't working for some reason. I think it could be because the name I want to rename it to is already taken by the draft, and so it wouldn't let me rename it to that. Well, I'll just keep it at this for now. Thanks for your help. -Melofors (talk) 22:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov)

On 25 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Vasily Kalinnikov composed his Symphony No. 1 while suffering from tuberculosis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi GeneralPoxter. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello GeneralPoxter,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

New page reviewer granted

Hi GeneralPoxter. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi GeneralPoxter, thanks a bunch for reviewing and accepting my article. NawJee (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Milton Cross.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milton Cross.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Request on 00:09:04, 16 April 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Tokidoki232

• Tokidoki232 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi!

Thank you for reviewing my draft article about Hartshorne Plunkard Architecture. I understand that the current draft has been declined, and the reason provided was because it was written like a marketing piece and did not have enough supporting evidence. May I ask for some additional guidance about what I could modify or eliminate that would make it seem less like a promotional article? I carefully reviewed the tips on how to write a Wikipedia page. The article is written in a neutral tone, was fact-based and referenced third-party sources in every section. Citations came from well-established publications such as the Chicago Tribune, Crain's Chicago Business, Architectural Digest, etc. If you could provide any specific advice about problematic areas and what I could rectify, I would greatly appreciate it.

Tokidoki232 (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Tokidoki232 (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi GeneralPoxter. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Lapablo. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Thuraineelavanai, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lapablo (talk) 13:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi GeneralPoxter, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Factcheck

Hi, a Turk is here. Yes, Atatürk insisted on the protection of secular reforms. - Aybeg (talk) 16:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification! GeneralPoxter (talk) 17:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Good articles

Hi GeneralPoxter, I'm sorry for the bit discouraging comment to your attempt to raise Atatürk to a GA or FA. I am also interested in reaching to raise an article to GA or FA, but I would not choose such a long article I've hardly contributed to. Here some steps which can follow to reach your goal. The editor has reached several FAs. I've read this, and it seemed to make sense. Then I've recently seen an FA from Louis Aragon Teresa Sampsonia and also a GA Safavid Georgia. Look at the references, Atatürk references are no match to these articles. I am also looking into a topic of which I could raise the article level, I think I choose a calm article that has not been woken since some time. And then really get some books, get to know the subject. And maybe I achieve a B, then I'd be already satisfied to begin with. I hope I've been of some help.13:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay got you. No I wasn't discouraged at all by your comments and am appreciative that you were so considerate to leave a personal message on my talk page. If time permits, I'll be sure to look at the issues you mentioned above. Thanks! GeneralPoxter (talk) 17:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I do believe you forgot to sign your comment on the talk page, though. GeneralPoxter (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Looking forward to see you raise an article soon then. And about the signature; you are correct. This time, I do sign, though. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you very much for contributing to the article Kemal Atatürk! Aybeg (talk) 20:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

American and British English dialects

Hi. Both dialects are included in the article Kemal Atatürk. (such as -ization/-isation) It should be written in one of two dialects. Can you be interested in this topic? - Aybeg (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes I expressed interest in this topic on the article's talk page a few days ago. During my run-through edit of the article over the past few days, I tried to standardize the article as best I could, but I don't think I caught all the instances of inconsistencies. I was hoping to reach a broad consensus first on the article's talk page before I took any drastic action such as placing the British English banner on the article's talk page. GeneralPoxter (talk) 14:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Curzon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jadoo TV

I used 2 sources. My knolage and the official sources, both present and past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.185.119.98 (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

2 sources is unfortunately not optimal for an article of that size. Furthermore, I am afraid that the main issue regarding your article draft is that it reads like an advertisement and does not demonstrate topic notability. Please try and improve the article by removing exhaustive details and lists of JadooTV products as well as showing how JadooTV has achieved noteworthy recognition (e.g. wide media coverage, large consumer base, etc.). Thanks for taking your time to stop by my talk page – GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Huion

Hello GeneralPoxter, Could you let me know what sources will be reliable. Is it an coverage like New York Times and Wall Street Journal ? I just search the sources from google to write this article by truth without any advertisement. I don't understand that my submission was be declined again. I hope you can provide me some help and guide me how to make it into an article. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachi1307 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello GeneralPoxter,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Iowa Valley Junior-Senior High School feedback

"So far, the only media sources included so far are local newspapers, which I do not believe constitute significant enough coverage." Using that criteria, most of the high schools in the US will never qualify. I'm aware that consensus was reached regarding the notability for high schools, but it's a bit unfair to exclude the schools who didn't have pages created prior to that decision, considering the average entry for a high school. It also unfairly penalizes rural areas, compared to metropolitan areas, where the only likely coverage is local newspapers. RickH86 (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

@RickH86: I am aware of your concerns, but this is simply Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia significant coverage policy dictates the need for evidence of substantial coverage, and observation of the titles of the cited sources in your draft is not enough to definitely prove these sources count as substantial. Further examination of your sources cannot be carried out because no online copies that article reviewers can access exist. Giving unverifiable articles the benefit of the doubt is risky, and thus we unfortunately cannot count your existing sources as substantial. I am sorry if my original comment was not clear about this. In addition, the article itself does not utilize any of your existing media sources to the topic's advantage by demonstrating notability. Finally, it is a undeniable truth that areas with less coverage tend to receive less coverage in encyclopedias like Wikipedia, and it is our responsibility as humans to work to bridge this inequity. However, I do not believe bringing your concerns here is the best way to address your qualms as I am in no position of power to change the existing policies of Wikipedia. I recommend bringing your concerns to the Notability talk page so that more qualified experts can deal with your concerns. GeneralPoxter (talk) 17:39, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Arenzano Funicular

Hello GeneralPoxter,
thanks a lot for your helpful hints on Draft:Arenzano funicular. I've been able to change the sources to Wikipedia standard and hope it is now ready to be published Jimiller123 (talk) 18:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Ground Swell

On 22 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ground Swell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the buoy in Edward Hopper's 1939 painting Ground Swell (pictured) alludes to impending doom, possibly the beginning of World War II? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ground Swell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft Ben Ramalingam

Hi thank you for the decision and input on the draft Ben Ramalingam. The references have now been updated to include verifiable third party sources - apologies that I used Wikipedia sources on the first draft! Could you take another look? Warmest thanks. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ben_Ramalingam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trumpgirl2000 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Mellow Pad

Hello! Your submission of The Mellow Pad at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 10:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The image also needs to be removed from the article and deleted from Commons. Yoninah (talk) 10:31, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The See-Saw has been accepted

The See-Saw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Singt dem Herrn ein neues Lied

I wonder why you picked one particularly unknown hymn to distinguish Singt dem Herrn ein neues Lied (Kempf) from, while there are several works by Bach, and psalm translations. How about a dab page? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I was considering making a disambiguation page, but I didn't have the time at the moment to do so. I chose that one since that page also had a redirect to the Kempf hymn. I think that the logic behind this is because the Bach works are actually settings of chorales and hymns but not hymns in themselves. I do agree making a disambiguation would make things a lot more organized though. GeneralPoxter (talk) 16:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Precious

paintings

Thank you for quality articles about paintings such as Ground Swell, Dog Barking at the Moon (Miró) and Ulysses and the Sirens (Waterhouse), and about music such as Symphony No. 1 (Kalinnikov), for gnomish tasks such as fixing typos and adding short descriptions, for dealing with articles for creation, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2461 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Mellow Pad

On 1 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Mellow Pad, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American artist Stuart Davis spent six years working on his jazz-inspired painting The Mellow Pad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Mellow Pad. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Mellow Pad), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello GeneralPoxter,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)