User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 11

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

→

Archive 15

Disney/Nick "movie" question

Geraldo, general question for you: if Disney Channel or Nickelodeon advertise something as a "movie" or a "movie event" (e.g. this), but there is no independent sourcing calling it such, is it still a "movie" (e.g. [1])? Or is it better called a "one-hour episode"? TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Reminds me of Stuck in the Middle's season two premiere, likely why the second season started with excellent ratings. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: Network marketing is jerking everyone around on this. http://www.disneyabcpress.com/disneyjunior/shows/the-lion-guard/episodes/the-rise-of-scar/ which is also a marketing outlet of the same network calls it episode 205. If the only advertising showing it to be a movie is a promo video, I say go with what the press site says. Also, after it airs, see how it is sold. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:37, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Personally, when it comes to The Lion Guard, I think that Rise of Scar counts as a TV movie, as it has a lot in common (format wise) with Return of the Roar. Both of them feature no narration during the title card, they both have several songs, and they both have a more cinematic feel compared to episodes of the regular series. But like I said, that's just my personal opinion. I'm fine either way. Wikicontributor12 (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Nurseline247 AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 01:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

References

Is that the "official" way of doing it? I thought it was just some odd formatting choice. When I cleaned up the articles in my sandbox, a very small amount had them like that before I touched them, but the majority didn't, so I thought maybe it was something outdated. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: See Help:List-defined references. It is actually somewhat new. Idea is to put the actual cite in the references section and just point to them when used in article, like I did. Makes reading the source a bit easier if the cite isn't embedded there. Editor choice in articles whether to do it or not. I generally follow the guideline of only doing it for multi-use references and generally don't bother changing whatever is already decided. It also makes cite maintenance easier if they are all in the same place. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

And how many times it's used probably also plays a role, eh? For example, with K.C. Undercover having two episodes on July 14, I used a ref name for the viewership since it was the same link for both episodes' viewership data. That was only repeated once, though, and wouldn't make sense to move it down to the References section. However, something like The Futon Critic, which is used as a column reference for titles, air dates, and production codes, would probably be more appropriate under the References section, particularly once a series gets a dedicated list of episodes article. Zap2it, on the hand, probably not so much. It's used for titles and air dates, but it's not one big listing like The Futon Critic as there are separate listings for each season, so it's not called quite as much as The Futon Critic. So maybe once something starts being called, say, five times, that's when it's appropriate to move the main ref name down to the References section or something like that. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I generally agree although 2 or 3 is my threshold, 5 for sure. It is good for any multi-use references that will likely stay in the article for long time. References that are short term like pre-aired episode info should be defined in-line on use so they can be deleted easily when no longer needed. Stuff used for column references look to be ideal for LDR. Still this is all an editor style preference. I think it is a good idea when used appropriately and it is a personal preference for me. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Question: There was a change made a while ago to Template:Reflist which automatically splits the list into columns when there are 11 or more references, which is why I removed it, so what exactly were you referring to with this? Thanks in advance! Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

It is being discussed at Template talk:Reflist and the 30em default might not stick. Removing it is a bit contentious. But I don't care much either way. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Ah, that I didn't see. I won't remove it anymore until a consensus is reached there, then. Thanks. Now, another somewhat related question while I'm here. Over at List of Henry Danger characters, you recommended that I add references for the characters a while ago on my talk page. Now I notice that over on DanWarp Dan Schneider has the character names like Henry Hart/Kid Danger, Ray Manchester/Captain Man, and even Jasper with his last name (Dunlop). Is his own site justifiable enough to change those names accordingly in the headers and even on the parent article from what they are currently? Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Yes. We've been using Schneider's site for official names before so that would be sufficient sourcing as a primary source from the show runner given that the names are not given in the show credits which would be a superior source. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: Bizaardvark

Likely going to need some extra eyes on the article following today's announcement. Just like with anything else, whether it's new cast additions or what have you, the article covers the series as a whole and he is still starring and should still be listed. There is also no such thing as a "Former main" section. Pinging MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H, and IJBall as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps Jake Paul as well, but that one's semi-protected until January 18 of next year due to BLP issues, so I don't think there will be as many problems there. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and requested semi-protection at WP:RfPP, though there's no guarantee – they've already declined one request I made there today... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I previously reverted this, but before I revert it again, just to make sure, should this stay as "portrays" per MOS:TENSE? (IJBall, Nyuszika7H, MPFitz1968.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: He worked as an actor on the series but mutually agreed to part ways with them (fired put politely) but it is obvious he portrays a character in the episodes he is in. Not like they deleted all his scenes. If an issue may need to rephrase and make clear. Looking at other actor articles it is common to refer to their past projects in the past tense as in starred, portrayed. Focus is on the job, not the fictional work. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Minor (edit conflict) Yeah, may be best to figure out a way to rephrase that. In general though, the leads of most WP:FILMBIO articles phrase these kinds of things as, "...She portrayed Elena Gilbert on The Vampire Diaries from 2010–2017..." This situation is a little more complicated though, as episodes with Paul as Dirk still have yet to air... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Thanks. So I have a couple of curiosity questions. 1) As we know, a perk of being a main cast member, which is reflected by what's shown during the opening credits sequence or during the credits after the cold opening if there isn't one, is to get paid all the same even if an actor is absent from an episode since they're still listed in the credits. Unless they change the opening credits sequence for Bizaardvark beginning with the first episode he doesn't appear in due to leaving the series—something that's not common as new opening credits sequences are usually only at the beginning of a new season—will Jake Paul still get paid for those episodes? 2) In cases like Degrassi, beginning with season 13, where main actors are only credited in the episodes in which they appear, do they still get paid when they're gone or only when they appear? Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: That is for normal situations. It looks like Jake Paul negotiated an exit after he was basically fired for cause and the terms of whatever happened modify the initial contract. Unless they say, we won't know. It will be interesting if they modify the opening credits to reflect his exit. They very well might. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

How about my other question? But yeah, it's a difficult and also sad—in a way—situation. Obviously, I don't condone disrespect, but I know his cast members consider him family—I saw Ethan Wacker personally post on his Twitter last night saying that he loved him and how he'll miss him on set—so him leaving must be hard on a lot of people, cast and other crew members. However, there are consequences for behavior like that. I do agree with what Jake Paul said in a video on YouTube yesterday, where he says not to believe everything the media says as they do have a habit of stretching the truth, exaggerating, etc. I personally don't believe he's this super bad guy everyone's making him out to be, but when there's video of him climbing on a news van, showing disrespect, you can't exactly argue with that as that's something that can't be twisted. He's obviously done enough to not be considered a good role model by Disney Channel, hence his departure. I'm not hating here, though, and that's something I don't agree with. Many people are just straight-up hating him. Not respectfully criticizing his behavior like I am here, but straight-up hating him, and that's not okay in my book and I personally find it to be just as bad. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: As for Degrassi they likely got paid only for the episodes they were credited in with some likely minimum negotiated to make sure they stayed available for when needed. As for Jake Paul, he likely broke some behavior clause in his Disney contract. Normally what you do on your own time is your own business but employers tend to get testy if it reflects badly on them. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I think Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn does the same thing as Brian Stepanek wasn't credited in the episodes he didn't appear in: the last three episodes of season two, airing-wise.

Yeah, exactly. Like, if you're an actor who is 21 or over and wants to have a few drinks, as long you don't overdo it and do anything crazy, go for it. That doesn't affect the company in any way. Jace Norman, Thomas Kuc, Ethan Wacker, and other Nickelodeon and Disney Channel stars have their own YouTube channels where they do video blogs and such, but they don't do anything that is over the top crazy or causes legal issues, so there are no issues there. Jake Paul was on YouTube and these other social media sites before coming on Bizaardvark which appears to be his first acting job, so I don't know what caused him to get to this point. I also don't know how to describe it. Is it that he got a big ego from being on Bizaardvark or what? Whatever it was, not the best behavior. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: If you are a real good actor, like Robert Downey Jr., they do tend to overlooks some past discretions. But you need to be real good and bring in the money. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: We're likely going to need to think of some different wording that still keeps it in the present tense as people keep changing it. People obviously don't understand how anything works or bother to check the history of articles. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure there is much we can do, but I've added a hidden note about this to Jake Paul. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

If anyone's interested, Jake Paul talked about it in his video today. It sounds like negotiations on leaving were taking place for about a couple of months, which was, of course, before the recent drama with his neighbors went down, so the drama could actually be just a small part of the reason for his departure. Skip to 6:22 here and watch until the end. (MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H, IJBall.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm sure you guys already are, but we're gonna need to keep extra eyes on this for a while more as I've now got another editor not affected by the semi-protection who just arbitrarily and unnecessarily made changes, like removing valid sources, without discussion, making ridiculous claims that Deadline and Variety are not reliable. That's even more ridiculous than that situation at Backstage a while ago. (IJBall, MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

There's a discussion on the talk page now, something that should have happened in the first place: Talk:Bizaardvark#Jake Paul. They're still missing the point. Nowhere did I say he left on his own accord, I wrote that he was leaving the series and Disney Channel. There's an obvious difference. I won't get into it too much here, though. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

On more general matters, just to give you guys an idea of how long we'll still be seeing him, see here. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:37, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Jake Paul

With Bizaardvark pretty much settled, though we should still keep an eye on it, we should probably shift our focus over to the Jake Paul article. On Bizaardvark, as Geraldo stated on its talk page, we really only care that he left the show, but more detailed information should be posted on Jake Paul's page. However, it should be done properly and not misquote things and the like. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

So two issues, Geraldo, IJBall. First, the current wording has WP:TONE issues—for example, "it is likely"—under the Career section, particularly that there is nothing that says he was let go, yet that's stated there. As before, we should just leave it as he's leaving the series and Disney Channel and not try to speculate what it was. Second, is New York Magazine a reliable source? Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: New York Magazine looks OK as a source but speculation as to reasons made by wiki editors that goes beyond what is explicitely stated in the source is WP:OR. I'd also considered any speculation as to reasons and "scare quotes" made by the writer of a otherwise factual article as personal opinions by the author and editorializing. "it is likely" phrasing in a Wikipedia article sets off a whole bunch of WP:NOR flags. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Hm. Thanks. So based on that, should It is likely that Paul actually got let go from Disney because of Paul's recent infamous antics, which included a feud between him and his neighbours and illegal stunts. and the corresponding source just be removed entirely? Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: The "it is likely" stuff is conjecture no matter where it is from. We need the straight facts and if a conclusion can be drawn let the reader draw it themselves. The source may be ok but if the only fact used from that source is the "it is likely" conjecture it serves no value. It does support some of other the other facts stated though, so editor choice on usefulness. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Geraldo, IJBall, I went with my gut and just removed it: [2] Will likely need to keep an eye on it as I'm sure we'll have IPs and accounts alike try to add the conjecture back in. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Yup, called it: [3]. More attempted conjecture. Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm not even touching the latest edit, particularly because I'm not sure, though I'd like to believe that when someone states something about their own person on their Twitter that that's a reliable source. Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: We can use a persons twitter as a self-published source of information about themselves but need to take care that it is not unduly self-serving per WP:TWITTER. We can report that they said something but not necessarily trust that it is objectively neutral or true. An attributed direct quote if we need the info in the article. I think of the times I've heard one side of the story of people breaking up and get a different spin from the other person. Twitter statements is just one spin. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Yep – on the one hand, Paul said it and it's sourceable. But OTOH, I'm not sure it adds anything to include it – What's Paul going to do after leaving Bizaardvark? Well, of course! he's going to focus on "improving his brand"!... So I don't think it really adds much to have that in the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Geraldo, IJBall, thanks, guys! Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

I could use some extras eyes on the article. Larsconks isn't exactly a vandal, but they've been rather disruptive and then combative when they're warned if you take a look at their talk page. I don't hate him, but I'm not a huge fan of Jake Paul—or "Jake Paulers" as he calls his fans—and that's been the case even before recent events, but even I know what his catchphrase is. (I subscribed a few months ago just because I found some videos interesting.) Although, truth be told, do we even need to list his catchphrase? Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: 2605:A000:1500:80DF:5C:2EC2:F4BF:E70

IPs like this keep popping up and adding bogus categories to live-action television series, and it's been going on since last year. Most recently, other than this IP, they've hit List of Bella and the Bulldogs episodes and List of Zoey 101 episodes. Is this a known IP using proxies? I'll ping IJBall as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I forgot to mention this earlier – but I too have noticed this IPv6 editor adding "animation" cat's to live-action TV series articles. This is persistent and long-term enough that something should be done, if it continues after today. As this is a dynamic IPv6, I'd advise taking this to WP:ANI (unfortunately), and looking to see if a rangeblock is possible to deal with this. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury and IJBall: Low intensity, pops up periodically, adds animation categories, then goes away for a while. That IP is only one in IPv6/64 range with any activity. I did a clean pass of past edits that were not current. Looks to have stopped for now. Watching. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Also to add, need at least a few warnings including a final one, before blocks will be considered. Looks to be someones home cable IP and static. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

New question

In what way is this supposed to considered "correct"? I have never seen this done at any other TV article anywhere, and I have no idea how MOS:COMMA is supposed to support that. The more relevant MOS guideline here would seem to be MOS:DATERANGE – if an {{ndash}} was used instead of the word "to", it would be "August 15, 2011 – March 12, 2013", with obviously no comma... Can somebody help me out here, and explain why this is either right or wrong better than I can?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: We've done that on TV series articles before before I reworded all of them just to avoid that because I agree it does look weird. The way I understand it is that the year is separate. You can take it out and a sentence still makes sense just like with others things. For example, The rabbit ran to its hole, which is a big hole, and jumped in. You can take out the comma separated bit and the sentence would still make sense: The rabbit ran to its hole and jumped in. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Can you just reword The Lying Game lead to please get rid of the comma, then? It looks horrible with the comma... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Should be good to go. It doesn't look awkward with "and" because we often place a comma before "and." I can't think of any examples where we place a comma before "to." "Too," yes, but not "to." Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall:@Amaury: MOS:COMMA and MOS:DATEFORMAT clearly show that when using month-day-year format to have a comma after the year as shown in their examples. Having a date range that uses an en dash to separate the dates is one exception (MOS:DATERANGE). Generally, I don't bother making any edit (or revert) to include or exclude the comma, though like with other types of editing, I'd get more concerned if there's a back-and-forth (mini edit war) involving it. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

The "to" and n-dash mean the same thing and the examples for DATERANGE don't show the comma. It looks awkward and wrong to put a comma there in a range statement. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: School of Rock

Pinging IJBall as well. Here's one that's definitely not right. User trying to include an actor award on the series page. May need some extra eyes depending on this user's stubbornness. I've come across them once before, and I also notice that they're currently being discussed at WP:ANI over some other issues. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: A major critical award for a performance such as an Oscar or Emmy for a role is tightly linked to, and should get listed as, one of the film or show awards. These popularity awards are pretty much about the person only and have little or no link to their performance work itself. One of the actors got a popularity award doesn't really reflect much about the show. Still opinions vary - see List of awards and nominations received by The Big Bang Theory for example. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Bogus ABC categories

Hi, Geraldo! Could you keep an eye on the editor I mentioned to you here back in mid-July? Although I am considering an AIV report might be appropriate. Thanks! Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Need advice on another one...

Anna Cathcart. Was previously nominated for deletion – Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Cathcart – in May, and the result was delete. I'm assuming this version is better sourced that the previous version that was deleted. But, objectively, subject looks to be short on WP:NACTOR, with only Odd Squad (TV series) and a very supporting role in Descendants 2 to her name... For once, I don't have a strong opinion on this one (though I lean towards thinking it's 1–2 years WP:TOOSOON), though if you think it's short of notability, I'd probably be inclined take it to WP:AfD then. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: She is getting a starring credit in a 2018 film which would cover NACTOR and multiple significant roles along with the series. The AfD concerns seem to have been covered. Coverage is light but it looks sufficient for an article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Using an edit notice on Bizaardvark?

With Jake Paul's announced departure from the series, and multiple editors including autoconfirmed accounts removing his name, I am having thoughts about using this approach (which I read only an admin or template editors can add but users can request). Semiprotection will only stop the IPs temporarily, but they and all other editors need to be aware of the WP:TVCAST guideline pertaining to this matter. Certainly, we could put hidden notes at various places in the article (there is one in the Characters section). Not sure what effect an edit notice will have, though there will be those who will ignore that or the hidden notes, not to mention the guidelines. Thoughts? (pinging Amaury, IJBall and Nyuszika7H) MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:39, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @MPFitz1968: I wouldn't be opposed to that idea. Right now we're safe from IPs for a year, so that's good news there. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:41, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit notices are for more general article issues. A hidden note next to his name might be worthwhile. Geraldo Perez (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Something like the copyright edit notice at List of Bella and the Bulldogs episodes? Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Descendants 2 and User:Mecj2

I saw your revert at Descendants 2 [4] and in your edit summary you said about names redirecting back to the article. Plenty of these redirects (to people who had been red links) were created quite recently by Mecj2, like Brenna D'Amico, Thomas Doherty (actor), Dylan Playfair, Dianne Doan and Jedidiah Goodacre, probably among others. I'm thinking those are inappropriate redirects, as Dianne Doan and Jedidiah Goodacre, at least, were in both Descendants films. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: The redirects look pointless to me as people clicking on a linked name get sent to an article that doesn't immediately look like it gives any information of value or why the user ended up there. Typical WP:EASTEREGG but with redirects instead of piped links. If there were something in the article of value there should be an anchor and the redirect targeted to the anchor. Unfortunately for actors it is fairly common practice on Wikipedia to do exactly what is done here, point to a project the actor is in in order to create a blue link instead of creating a stub article. I disagree strongly with this practice but it is still common practice and getting the pointless to me redirect deleted is unlikely to be supported by others. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Category creation?

Hey, who knows how to create (and populate) a category?!... In messing around with {{WikiProject Degrassi}} with this edit, it looks like I (inadvertently) started linking articles to Category:Degrassi: Next Class articles, which is empty. At the least, it looks like Degrassi: Next Class and List of Degrassi: Next Class episodes should be included in this currently-"null" category...

So, anyone know what needs to be done? In addition to the TPS's, I'm going to ping Nyuszika7H specifically, in case he knows anything about categories... TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: You create a category by editing the category article itself with some description of what should be in the category. That turns the category into a blue link when added to articles. That is pretty much it for the mechanics. Whether or not a category should be created is another issue. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

The latter question is above my pay-grade, but this is how the Degrassi WP banner template works with the other shows. (In total, it looks like there are at least 6 Degrassi: Next Class-related articles, so a category doesn't seem too unreasonable to me in this case...) But thanks for the explanation! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: On the subject of Whether or not a category should be created is another issue, see Category:Descendants, a category I don't believe is warranted considering it only has four entries. It was also created by one of our disruptive editors. And two of entries in that category were also created by them. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Second opinion needed on an edit to Bizaardvark

Do you see this as being WP:UNDUE? (MPFitz1968, IJBall.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: It is supported per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Normally, I wouldn't have second-guessed it, but I was under the impression that the "Home media" section was only for just that, home media. I don't see online distributors like Amazon and iTunes as "home media," but reading the home media section in the MOS, it looks like they're also considered "home media." The tone used also seems a little odd. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion about this – Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television/August 2016 updates/Release – but it seems to have stalled. In that discussion, I specifically mentioned that we need to expand this section of MOS:TV to better cover streaming/Netflix stuff. Now, in the specific case of Bizaardvark, I think that section should be retitled to something other than 'Home media' (as it doesn't really cover DVDs), though I don't really know what it should be called... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: That should be better: [5]. The only thing that might be weird is that it says all episodes are available, but we are only linking to the first volume. I don't know if we should be providing links to all the currently available volumes—in Bizaardvark's case, three—or just the first volume as we are now and people can just navigate from there to the other volumes. I'm thinking the latter is what the general practice is. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

List of Zoey 101 episodes

I'm gonna need some assistance. Thanks in advance. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Would page protection be justified now? Pinging IJBall as well for the matter in general. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes. That, or WP:AIV, as they've reached the Level 4 warning. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Note that 99.245.193.225 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 2607:FEA8:919F:F9BA:837:C6D0:B521:F669 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) geo locate to the exact same place and are likely the IPv4 and IPv6 aliases of each other that Wikimedia software chooses, somewhat randomly, to identify edits with. I know when I was testing stuff logged out my IPv4 address and IPv6 address tagged edits somewhat indeterminately, don't know why, so this is unlikely to be deliberate. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

IPv6 is currently blocked, but have spotted a newly registered account User:Marthaspeaks123 making the same type of edits as the IP in the parent article, and is very likely block evasion. Haven't reported the user yet, but I've given them a level 4 warning already. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Not certain same person and other than reverting my last edits as first edits done may be making good faith attempts at being constructive. As a logged in user may be willing to communicate and collaborate. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: I've watched the parent article and will help out. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Looking at latest edits, looks like my hopes might be misplaced. Still adding same false information about ep counts and continuing from recently blocked IPv6. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Forgot to mention, but I did request semiprotection on the parent article after reverting Marthaspeaks123 and seeing the number of edits made by the blocked IPv6. Will wait and see whether it gets the protection, and hopefully we'll get a break from this disruption. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: I think it's time to report this user. Sock or not, clearly WP:NOTHERE. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I've gone ahead and asked for semiprotection on the LoE article, too. (Still have yet to see anything about the parent article regarding that.) MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:The Loud House#How Can Anyone Not See This?

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Loud House#How Can Anyone Not See This?. I have no knowledge on this particular subject, so perhaps you guys might know. IJBall, MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H. Cheers! Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Need some table help

Would you mind having a look at R5 (band)#Awards and nominations. You have previously removed some non-notable awards and it has since been replaced. Also need to remove two entries based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Disney Music Award for Best Band. I spent a good hour trying to figure out these multi-layered rowspans and just can't get it. Anyway you can have a run at it?--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@Loriendrew: I think I did what you wanted to the article. Major hassle removing stuff in a complex table. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@Loriendrew: A major problem there is that that table's use of 'rowspan' violates WP:ACCESSIBILITY, in addition to making it unnecessarily difficult to edit... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks much. After a certain point you just have to give up and see if anyone else can get it to work. Ban rowspan and I'd be happy to sortable tableize things.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@Loriendrew and IJBall: Rowspan, except for the first column, is discouraged in general, but making the changes was enough of a hassle as it was so didn't want to remake the table completely. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:53, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

+1. Banning rowspan in most instances would solve a lot of current problems with wikitables... I may try to fix the table at R5 if I get bored enough/have some time. But I've got a lot of non-Wiki stuff on my plate right now... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Why distributor need references?

It clearly state that the television production company need distributor. Why some Disney Channel show doesn't have a distributor yet? Still makes no scene. Jasonnguyen2606 (talk | contribs) 12:25, 17 August 2017 (ICT)

@Jasonnguyen2606: For a broadcast television series the network is the distributor because they broadcast the series, and that is in the network attribute. They deal directly with the production company and not through an intermediate distributor. Other distribution deals that the production company does should be supported by references. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:China Anne McClain

I'm guessing that this is an improper category that should be deleted?... What's the next step? --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: It doesn't look like it's their first rodeo, either: User talk:Happypillsjr#Category:Jennette McCurdy has been nominated for discussion. God, that'd be like me creating a category for Hunter Street and including only, well, Hunter Street. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: Nominate for deletion as the above mentioned one was using the same rationale. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done – Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 August 18. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

that message

Obvious trolling by IP.

for your big fat information. that so-called unsourced content I did to Hotel Transylvania: The Series were really some ideas I had for the show and I have many more — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:15C0:5A0:D441:1F5B (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC) I suspected you invented all that, thanks for the confirmation. We are not interested in fanfic on Wikipedia. Plenty of places for that on the net. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC) like where exactly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c4:890d:cf00:c512:f9a8:9f4b:c9e0 (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC) fanfiction.net for a start. Just not here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC) and another thing I don't have a fanfiction.net account— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:C512:F9A8:9F4B:C9E0 (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC) you big bully. my ideas for Hotel Transylvania: The Series. are not hoaxes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23c4:890d:cf00:c512:f9a8:9f4b:c9e0 (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC) Post your fanfic some other place. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC) like where, give me one example — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:C512:F9A8:9F4B:C9E0 (talk) 21:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC) (edit conflict) Like, not here. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC) you are lucky my mum doesn't know how to use a laptop buster or she would have a thing or two to say about this DK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:C512:F9A8:9F4B:C9E0 (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC) I'm so scared. Geraldo, I'm 100% confident they're trolling and have been since they posted their original message. Under normal circumstances I would revert, but it is your talk page and this isn't clear-cut vandalism. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC) touchy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:C512:F9A8:9F4B:C9E0 (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Big Hero 6: the Series

Hey, did you removed my edit?--ExplorerX19 (talk) 02:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@ExplorerX19: Yes and I left an edit summary explaining why. Good to check the edit history. Too many personal opinions about genres for that series as it is and the existing ones need to be replaced with something supported by references, not people's opinions. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Special Agent Oso episodes#Episodes need to be listed in order of air dates

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Special Agent Oso episodes#Episodes need to be listed in order of air dates. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

As much as anything, I'm interested to see your thoughts on whether the UK air dates column should be included or not. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Peyton Elizabeth Lee

I've seen a couple of IPs add this to the infobox. I'm thinking this is an improper use of "agent", as the instructions at Template:Infobox person state "discouraged in most cases, specifically when promotional". While I'm not quite sure about the "promotional" aspect here, it appears its use in this way is incorrect. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:24, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: I don't know what their deal is but Disney Channel is not a management agent for talent so that info is bogus on the face of it. I see it as vandalism and deliberate misinformation. Other than that it should be referenced if a real talent agency is put there and generally it is not something we put in articles. Promotional is some agency putting their name in articles for advertising their services and is sometimes done when an agency is actively updating one of their clients articles. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

Thanks! Sockpuppet playing its games again. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

IP hopper

I've range blocked this irritating IP hopper for two weeks. If you see them pop up on another range, or if they continuing littering unsourced trivial agency info post-block, could you please drop me a note on my talk page? --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Big Time Rush (band)

Geraldo, it may be time to ask for semiprotection on this one – this has been going on for quite some time now, and it doesn't seem to be going away. Pinging Amaury as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: Blocked now. I'm not sure about semi-protection, though, as it's only one IP instead of different ones. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall and Amaury: Generally won't get a protect if only one IP is edit warring stuff. Blocks are always preferred to protects. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I had thought there had been similar problematic editing there from an IPv6 as well, but looking at it, the IPv6 was a while ago, and it looks like they were doing something else... --IJBall (contribs • talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

The Nutshack

The Nutshack was on many networks so stop removing it from the channels — Preceding unsigned comment added by GIRCrazyWaffles (talk • contribs) 23:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@GIRCrazyWaffles: With all the disparate networks you were adding this to seems extremely unlikely. Please provide a reference. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Only the original airing network matters – any network it aired on after premiering is not listed in the infobox... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:24, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Jess Harnell‎

To Geraldo and his TPS's – I could use some help over at Jess Harnell‎: I have an edit-warring IP who keeps adding an unverified role (e.g. even IMDb does not list it, so it's completely unverified). TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: Looking at /64 range he seems to be adding this type of stuff to a lot of actor pages with respect to that show. Looks like deliberate misinformation. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

my ideas

can we talk about these — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:3DA0:D10A:60BA:8DE5 (talk) 18:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

As before, we document what happens on the show only. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

I see so what do you like about Hotel Transylvania: The Series cause I'm and up and coming fan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:890D:CF00:4D69:A309:2DE6:37F3 (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

JE98

Would you review their edits when you can? They seem to making questionable edits, at the very least, and unnecessarily replacing PNG uploads with SVG for no real reason. Thanks. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: See File:Disney Junior Logo.png for reason. SVG is preferred over PNG because of storage efficiency. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

The Shari Lewis Company

Is even this a real company? If it is, do they produce Poppy Cat? Because someone keeps adding it in to Poppy Cat (TV series), and it keeps getting reverted. -- Logosncompanies (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Logosncompanies: I can find no evidence that a company with that name even exists or why anything associated with Sheri Lewis would even be interested in that series even if it did. IMDb only shows Coolabi Productions and King Rollo Films as production companies for that show but if you have access to the actual credits that would be best. Also dubious is assertion of American involvement in production which is very unlikely. This looks to be a purely British production. Also looking at User talk:107.77.169.12 and the edit history of the user who added gives some indication on likely veracity of anything they add to any article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Landry Bender

I'm not sure about the image added here [6]. It doesn't look like a representative picture of her - if she's shaving her head bald or wearing a cap that makes her look bald for a particular cause, that's one thing, but not sure it's appropriate here. But of an even greater issue - is this violating copyright? I couldn't tell from the image's info, but it was fairly recently uploaded. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Ripped from Getty Images so blatant copyright violation as Getty Images does not release images with a free-use license that we can use for bio articles of living people. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Going to need some assistance

This vandal's back. (IJBall, MPFitz1968.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Project Mc2

One the same topic, the Project Mc2 article could use more eyes on it. I think only myself and Nyuszika7H have it on our watchlists currently, and Nyuszika7H isn't as active these days... This article now has a dedicated IPv6 vandal who has been making the same vandalistic edit since at least mid-August. I'll go ahead and ask for page protection for it again at WP:RfPP, but more eyes on this one would be helpful. Pinging Amaury and MPFitz1968 as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: Watching. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Thomas Doherty (actor)

I'd appreciate it if you could start keeping an eye on this one. We have a new editor who pretty clearly doesn't understand what our notability guidelines are, or how our MOS works either. (Frankly, this new article is YA example of why we need WP:ACTRIAL in place so badly...) Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

OK. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Disruption of unsourced name enhancements continues

Would a range block request be appropriate or would it be too large of a range like with the date vandal? Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Just by looking at Nick Spano alone, it's too large a range of IPv6 addresses, something like /40. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: It is a /40 range, this today, owned by Verizon Wireless for people using their cellular data plan. It moves around a lot and far too much collateral damage for a range block. He has a set of things he hits and I watch the range periodically to check for others. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Matthew Underwood

I'm inclined to slap a speedy deletion on this one (G4) as the previous article about him was deleted via a previous AfD back in January. Where I'm scratching my head is the G4 guideline says it needs to be a sufficiently identical copy of the previous article, but I have no idea on that. Also, the title of the new article goes against convention with the use of the capital "A" (in actor), plus the two references mentioned in the article don't work, which is annoying. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Just make sure to point to the previous AfD discussion when you tag it. Presume it is sufficiently identical, the admin will reject the G4 if it isn't but based on how sparse it is, likely is the same. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Tagged. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn - Mace Coronel (Dicky)

I know that only statements the network and the showrunner make are ones that we can use even if a cast member has mentioned something on their verified account on whatever site because the network and showrunner are the only ones who speak for show. However, how do we handle something like this? From what I heard, they've got 12 of the 14 (production) episodes ordered for the fourth season filmed, but it will certainly cause some confusion if the fourth season is ordered additional episodes and/or the series is renewed for a fifth season. The series most likely will have additional episodes ordered for its fourth season as a common pattern with Nickelodeon with The Thundermans and Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn seems to be to order small seasons at first (13 or 14 episodes), and then order more. This was the case with Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn's third season, which was initially ordered 14 episodes, but then had an additional order, bringing the total to 24 episodes. Same with The Thundermans' fourth season, which was ordered additional episodes twice, and both of the series' other seasons, I believe, except the first seasons, which were ordered 20 episodes from the start. Whereas series like Henry Danger and Game Shakers get about 20 episodes from the start when they're renewed. Pinging MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H, and IJBall. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: All he's said that we can use is that he is off the show as he is speaking about himself. Info about the show, other than his leaving it, can't be used as he does not speak for the show (and since he's left it has even less knowledge than before). Geraldo Perez (talk)

That's basically what I was trying to ask, but I may have worded it poorly. Can we insert that he's leaving the show on the parent article and source his Instagram post or do we have to wait until the network announces it and Deadline and other secondary reliable sources post it? Like with Jake Paul. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Editor choice. I'd suggest waiting for a secondary source to show it is notable. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Waiting sounds like a good idea. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Ed, Edd & Eddy vandal

Geraldo, the Ed, Edd & Eddy vandal is back, and is active at List of American television programs‎, at least. Just so you know. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Geraldo – vandal is back at List of American television programs. Any suggestions?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: ISP is Verizon Wireless and looks to be 2600:1012:b000::/40 a very large range to range block used for people's cellular data connections. Only thing I can think of is look for normal haunts and check all edits when seen. Annoying. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Advice question...

Please take a look at Jon Simmons – {{Notability}}-tagged since 2013. May only be notable for his clients rather than for himself. Now it did go through WP:AfC, but that was back in 2012, and I wouldn't necessarily trust AfC c.2012. I am strongly tempted to WP:PROD this one... What do you think? --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: Just a quick look at the references, it is just passing mentions of his involvement with others to get them started so don't see significant coverage in multiple sources sufficient for meeting GNG. Actor roles are minor so doesn't look to meet NACTOR. PROD with reasons might see this deleted if low interest in keeping it. Consider AfD if PROD removed. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

How to handle this in the episode table?

We seem to have a unique situation here with I Am Frankie, at least I think it's unique as I don't ever recall seeing this before. The series premiered last Monday, September 4, though Nickelodeon called it a sneak peek. The official "premiere" was yesterday. Here's the situation: The first episode is a double-length single episode as seen here on the Nickelodeon site: [7] (44 minutes). The series isn't on Amazon and iTunes yet, but Nickelodeon's site is just as official in that regard. The sneak peek that aired on September 4 was the first half of what aired yesterday, meaning that only one episode has aired thus far. That means "I Am ... in Danger" should be episode one. How do we handle this with the first half used for the sneak peek being titled something else? Pinging MPFitz1968 and Nyuszika7H as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Okay, wait. I just noticed that the title of the video has "Ep 1/2," so now I'm not so sure. Hopefully this is put up on Amazon and iTunes soon so we can know for sure. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Never mind. It is on Amazon now, and I was right: [8]. So my original question is still valid. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: That is unique. First airing was with what they called a sneak peek. The next new content is the second half of a combined extended length episode. I guess go with the titles as listed so far and note that the first half of the second episode was a repeat of the first episode to air. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Ugh! This seems to be more complicated than when Disney Channel premiered Andi Mack as a double-length special when it was actually two separate episodes shown back-to-back as seen on Amazon and iTunes.

and note that the first half of the second episode was a repeat of the first episode to air So forgive me here, but wouldn't that be confusing? The "second" episode, as it is currently listed, is actually the first episode, which is a single double-length episode—like Henry Danger's "Hour of Power" double-length episode. This is further supported by how "I Am ... in Danger," the only listing, is listed on Amazon as mentioned. It's just that only the first half of "I Am ... in Danger" was used for the sneak peek, which was also given a different title instead of leaving it as it was. If you take a look at the video I linked in my first message and skip to 22:00, a few seconds from that point, you'll hear "Urgent! Liquid detected! Important! Locate shelter immediately!" Right after that is where the sneak peek ended, right before it switches away from Frankie's view of things. If you continue for a few more seconds, you'll see Cole comes up to Frankie and provides shelter for her with his umbrella, and there was no transition of any kind in the full episode where the sneak peek ended.

The only thing I can think of doing is something like this or simiar: https://i.imgur.com/Tr48wrO.png Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: That would work too and match Amazon. Try it and see if anyone objects. Non-standard so becomes whatever editor consensus for this show is. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.  Done. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

That looks good. Are we expected to get ratings for the combined episode? Should it be TBD or N/A? nyuszika7h (talk) 15:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Nyuszika7H: We should since the whole thing is being considered new due to how Nickelodeon packaged it. Ratings are delayed, however, due to Hurricane Irma which recently hit Florida. We're still waiting for rescheduled delivery times for Saturday–Tuesday finals. Tuesday finals aren't "technically" delayed as they're usually posted around 1:00 PM (PT) on Wednesdays, which is today, but they'll want to release things in order. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Per what I said here, where I'm not really sure how to handle that, I just thought of something else that might work. Since the sneak peek wasn't a full episode and just part of it, as I mentioned above earlier, I wonder if it would be reasonable to list the sneak peek as a standalone special, somewhat similar to what we did with Hunter Street's recap special. Thoughts? IJBall, Nyuszika7H, MPFitz1968? Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

I am not sure how to handle this, but I would not list it as a "special" – it's the bona fide pilot episode. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: It was shown with a full set of credits so was packaged as a full episode. Can sort of look at the second episode as an extended version of the first. Could treat it like a special but label it pilot and start the numbering with the network labeled series premiere episode. That keeps the numbering to match Amazon which heads of a lot of future problems. First series airing dates should still match when the pilot aired with season 1 starting with the official premiere as defined by the network. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Something similar to this? (See bottom.) Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I don't like putting it at the end of the table. If it were separated out it should be in a separate table, not part of season 1 and just contain the pilot as the sole entry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I would have had it at the top. But gotcha! So basically what I suggested, but labeled differently. I'll give that a try. Can't hurt to try at least and see how that works out. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

 There. I believe that should be good. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Looks good. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Sofia Carson

Geraldo, there was an unattributed SPLIT at Sofia Carson by Mecj2. I'm currently moving right now, so I can't get to it on my end. TIA! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

June 10

Hey, you reverted the recent addition of Jessica DiCicco to the births of June 10 with the edit summary "Unsourced". Even though I didn't add her to that list, I thought the addition looked fine (in accordance with her page), but maybe there is something I'm not getting. I've also only very recently started reviewing pending changes (a lot of which are on the day of the year pages), so maybe this is something basic that I should know when I deal with those pages in the future. Could you just quickly explain your reasoning there? Thanks Felida97 (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

@Felida97: I rechecked and see that it was referenced. I undid my edit. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

@Geraldo Perez: That is a relief, I was afraid I overlooked something obvious and felt bad that I accepted it. Thank you for clearing that up. Felida97 (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

London Tipton

Looks like an undo, but i added a ref and forgot to note in summary. soz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craic Den (talk • contribs) 05:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes

Could you guys keep an extra eye on this? People keep trying to add the season three end count and date. We likely won't be able to do that until there's information on season four premiering/episodes. (I like how the last editor I reverted 13 minutes ago made false allegations.) College starts for me again today, so I won't be as available as I've been all summer. Normally, I'd still be on my laptop during breaks or when I'm done with classes and waiting for the bus, but my laptop started crashing back during spring quarter, so I just got fed up with it, and after summer break started, I just threw it hard against the floor. It probably still works, but I'm planning on getting a new laptop soon. (I was planning on getting a new one even if I hadn't thrown it.) Until then, I just have my tablet, and while I can use the desktop version of Wikipedia just fine and still revert and the like, it takes a while to type. I'll also be mostly watching YouTube videos. I'll be using the library computers to add viewership information (I've only used the tablet when I had to), but I'm not going to be there the whole time. Thanks, guys! (MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H, IJBall. IJBall, I know you're in the process moving, but tagging you, anyway, just for the heads up. ) Amaury (talk | contribs) 13:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

SUG DHX media missing reference

We need to look up the reference for DHX Media for distribution of Sonic Underground, anyway, and Rovio has a revival of Angry Birds Blues, but The prints are missing for Ham'o'ween Short Movie, can you link the reference and find the prints? UnknownPro (talk) 22:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

@UnknownPro: Template:Infobox television/doc says for "distributor" - "The names of the original distribution company or companies" so we shouldn't be updating the distribution beyond the original distributor(s). Company names should stay with the original names and not be updated. Change in company names later on are handled by redirects from the linked original name so readers get to the right article if interested. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

But vivendi is the original distributor from 1998–2005, DiC took control of this company and took over by CJG, then DHX Media UnknownPro (talk) 02:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@UnknownPro: Then Vivendi Entertainment as currently listed in the article, with a reference, is correct as all we want here is the name of the original distributor. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

If you see the Ham'o'ween short movie poster, it might be on Finland.

So Vivendi's owners can't distribute Sonic Underground because of Universal Pictures UnknownPro (talk) 17:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

We are looking for original distributor there in the infobox. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The Adventures of Kid Danger & Captain Man?

WP:TOOSOON? This one is borderline as per WP:TVSHOW, as it only has an "announced" approximate release date rather than an exact release date. I am sorely tempted to Page mover this one into Draftspace, but I thought I would check with you first... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: It seems to meet the strict reading of TVSHOW as it has been picked up for 10 episodes and announced in an upfront per the reference in the article. I wouldn't expect an exact schedule this far in advance. However it does not meet GNG now with only one primary source talking about it and no independent secondary sources. Needs a stub tag. Maybe tag it for notability and lack of sources and see if any can be provided, wait a bit and move it to draft space per GNG if none forthcoming. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

OK, I'll do both. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

NetWitz

I've already reported this user over at WP:AIV, but IJBall and myself are going to need some reinforcements until the report is looked at. Bogus name enhancements not supported by show's credits or reliable secondary sources over on Landry Bender and Best Friends Whenever. Pinging MPFitz1968 as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Netwitz is also using the full name of Landry Bender's character in Fuller House, which I've reverted on the grounds of their not providing a secondary source to support it. If it is in fact mentioned in the show, it would be from an in-universe perspective unless reported in a secondary source. (I definitely remember the many reverts of "Farkle Minkus" in GMW, until a secondary source showed his full name, which was around the time the season 2 episode "Girl Meets I Am Farkle" came out.) MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Speaking of Fuller House, may need extra eyes on that one - editors other than NetWitz are making questionable edits. I just reverted one who put John Stamos, Bob Saget, Lori Loughlin and Dave Coulier in the infobox (under "starring"); they are not main cast, but are special guest stars when they appear in episodes. I noted I've made a bunch of recent reverts, and don't want to get in hot water with 3RR. MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Watching, and I've just reverted an edit by our little edit warrior here. I wouldn't worry about 3RR as reverting obvious misinformation is basically equivalent to reverting vandalism. Articles should be accurate. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I just passed by AIV, and they denied your report and suggested you take it to AN3. I just warned NetWitz for edit warring at Fuller House. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: And I see they're still at it, but I'll leave it alone for now, so ANEW is the best option now. The rejecting administrator is creating a discussion on the Fuller House talk page, but I don't see how much good that will do since NW clearly thinks they're right and we're wrong, so their arguments will probably be a bunch of useless "but the name is said in the show..." without expanding or elaborating and all that blah blah junk. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Well, they got slapped with a one-week block for the edit warring. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) MPFitz1968, IJBall, well, scratch that. They've been blocked for one week with the next block being indefinite if they continue. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) A talk page discussion establishes a more formal consensus position and is useful to point back to if same issue arises in the future. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

That's a fair point, Geraldo. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I'd also add that it is difficult for newer editors to learn how Wikipedia works. New editors can get a lot of feedback telling them they cannot do something, and it is easy to take disagreement personally in that situation. I have found many new editors respond well to discussion with more experienced editors where the relevant guidelines are explained. I was hoping that is what we might have been able to have here. It often doesn't always work out that way, and it didn't here, but can't say I didn't try :). Prodego ^talk 21:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything

It's only right that I follow up. You can see the companies here. Skip to 21:53. I would use the link that comes from "copy video URL at current time" and link you directly to that time, but for some reason, it says it's blacklisted. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Not even sure they are production companies as doesn't even say that in the name. If you want to add them it is supported but the real production company for these shows is It's a Laugh, the others are likely vanity companies for the exec producers but that is just my personal opinion. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Good point. I'll go ahead and re-remove them. I never thought of it like that. If there's no "productions" at the end, then it's questionable. If they're not production companies, I wonder what they are, then. Amaury (talk | contribs) 23:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Editor (your) choice as everything sourced need not appear in the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Right, and I definitely agree with that statement, which is why I partially reverted myself. I'm just curious as to what those would be if they're not production companies. I wonder if they're some other company for shows. Since there's no "productions" on a lot of things, it would also be reasonable, should we choose, to remove similar things from the other articles. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Likely just the company name used by some executive producer who a lot of times has no real role in making the show, just some ownership interest in the property and gets paid to use it. Would need to research it to be sure. I don't like second guessing credits as that gets into the WP:OR realm but lack of production in the name makes removing that name from a production attribute a bit more supported. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

After our discussion here, it looks like there are some exceptions, such as Schneider's Bakery which even has its own article and doesn't have "Productions" in the title. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Unseen speedy deletion of File:Lizzy Greene.jpg

Geraldo Perez OK thanks for informing me, but I'm not much of an active Wikipedia user. At least make sure that the admins take this into notice and to give a speedy deletion contest about 30 days deadline to make sure that the victim actually sees it and gets time to act upon it. Propork3455 (talk) 16:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

EDIT: This is also a response to the same subject on my talk page.

@Propork3455: Replied on your talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Bella and the Bulldogs

Could you use some (temporary) extra attention. Persistent additions of unsourced last names and non-recurring characters. MPFitz1968, IJBall, Nyuszika7H. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

List of Lab Rats episodes

I could use some additional attention here as I've got an IP who's adding a bunch of nonsensical—and unsourced, for that matter—trivia regarding episode titles being references to whatever. This started Thursday. Looking at their contributions, this isn't the only article they've disrupted with that trivia, as I also see disruption on List of Good Luck Charlie episodes, List of Pair of Kings episodes, and other articles, though I just noticed this, so I haven't really reviewed their edits other than those on List of Lab Rats episodes. Pinging IJBall and MPFitz1968 as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: I just happened to revert that kind of edit at List of Good Luck Charlie episodes, before I saw this. MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Looks to be that IPs project, adding unsourced WP:OR personal comparison opinions. Likely a sock but has been on that IP for a while. This IP is wireless data but he has been blocked as 76.28.10.189 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for a year. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and added both Lab Rats and the LoE article to my watch list – these are no longer "current" TV shows, and Lab Rats is a minor fave of mine, so I'll start to keep an eye on these... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

for manually reverting the IP here, It drives me mad when people revert back to whatever revision and have no interest in readding all of the edits back so thanks for kindly reverting manually :), Happy editing, –Davey2010^Talk 01:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Tangled: The Series

Do you think semi-protection seems reasonable now? Block evasion again. The latest IP's comments on the talk page are just bunch of trolling. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Yup, definitely trolling now: [9] Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Ignore my original message. Apparently I suffered memory loss since I already requested protection before coming here. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Frozen (franchise)

Hi! Could you please check out the categorizations on the related pages? Some of them seemed to me like involved in WP:SUBCAT, or may be I am wrong. Also, any comment on this? One more thing that Elsa and Anna are royal sisters, so can Category:Films about royalty and Category:Films about sisters be added back to Frozen 2 page? I am seriously very confused in categorizing pages, hope for your kind response. :) Thanks! M. Billoo 21:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

@M.Billoo2000: Most of the categories on Frozen 2 were copied from Frozen with the assumption the two movies would be the same. We have no idea of the plot of Frozen 2 so categorizing it to that fine a level is too soon. Likely it will about the sisters as the first one was and that was the major theme of the first movie and then would be WP:DEFINING. Other stuff is background and not what the movie was about just the setting. Suggest waiting on Frozen 2 until we get a plot and some sources talk about it before worrying how to categorize it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Is there need of edits in the Frozen 2#Production? I think maybe some of the old news can be trimmed, what are your comments? Thanks! M. Billoo 03:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

@M.Billoo2000: I'd leave it for now. Mostly a judgment call of what to prune but that is basically all we know right now. After release we'll have a lot more for other parts of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Question

Geraldo, an IP has been making a series of edits like this one to various TV series articles. I'm not sure have an opinion on this, so I'm checking with you. Appreciate your thoughts... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: I was about to raise this as well. One of their edits—on Jessie—has already been reverted. Probably almost all of the articles in my sandbox have been targeted by this IP as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Also see this. There's no doubt it's the same person. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall: I've seen it and it looks benign. So far as I can tell the categories look valid. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Geraldo, IJBall, something of interest to maybe consider. This user who is mass adding these categories also created them, at least "American teen sitcoms." "American television sitcoms" should be sufficient, in my opinion. Amaury (talk | contribs) 22:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Even if that category gets deleted (which it may well), it's going to take somebody with Mass rollback to fix all of this, and that's above my pay grade... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

@IJBall and Amaury: Process is to propose deletion via category for deletion process. Part of close process is telling a bot what to do to effect the deletion on all articles if that is the close decision. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Cast of Disneys Jessie.jpg

The image is way too big for a non-free image - it's almost twice the guideline size. I'm sure any image maps can be rescaled if necessary. The presence of an image map is not a sufficient reason to exceed the guideline, one needs a far better rationale to have an oversized image. The image size that will comply with the guideline would be 349x286 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Errors in sources

How do we handle a situation like this? Deadline says Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn season three ended August 3, which is clearly incorrect as there was no new episode on that date. The last episode was on August 5. So I don't even know if we can use that Deadline source for that and I wonder if we should just wait until season four episodes are scheduled. Amaury (talk | contribs) 05:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Use the source that matches an aired episode date. Sufficient to say season over either way. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

NRDD

Hey, I was just wondering, if every site considers it 24 episodes and Nick considers it 24, why do we only count it as 23 on this website? Doesn't that take away from the overall episode count if we don't mention that there are 24 episodes but one is a one hour special? I just think that's the only logical and right thing to do. I've noticed some shows on the wiki don't truly represent that actual episode count which as a Wikipedia, shouldn't it be the truth? I was trying to use the citing source thing to note it since I saw it also used on shows where the overall episode count of a season could vary due to the length of one episode. Just want to know if that's not allowed on here, though.. :)Joshie (New Horizons Await You) 05:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ijoshiexo: Because we are documenting what actually aired and is sold on streaming services, 23 episodes with last one using a special production code to show it was a special double length episode. The production team thinks about production slots and most of the sources are reporting what the production team states. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

@Geraldo Perez: Oh okay. I was just wondering for next time. Sorry about that! Thanks for responding.Joshie (New Horizons Await You) 05:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

100 000th edit

Congratulations with passing the milestone.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Ella Anderson

I might need some additional eyes on this article, or extra attention if already being watched. Thanks. MPFitz1968, IJBall. Amaury (talk | contribs) 13:55, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

@Amaury: Has been on my watchlist for a long time. I am aware of the poorly sourced bio info being added and reverted before I needed to revert it myself. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)