GeraltOfRivia2077
GeraltOfRivia2077, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi GeraltOfRivia2077! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC) |
September 2018
editHello, I'm Random character sequence. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to REDengine seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Random character sequence (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales (September 21)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your thread has been archived
editHi GeraltOfRivia2077! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Flooded with them hundreds 13:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Note on adding unsourced content
editHey, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.
Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Flooded with them hundreds 13:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
editWelcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Ibrahim Mohamed Solih. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. - lollerwaffle (Talk) 00:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thronebreaker (September 29)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thronebreaker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thronebreaker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
October 2018
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. -- ferret (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Please Unblock me
editGeraltOfRivia2077 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I created the draft about the new Witcher game Thronebreaker (Draft:Thronebreaker). I actually want to help Wikipedia have more stuff about The Witcher and Cyberpunk 2077. I don't know what I did wrong. Please unblock me and tell me what I did wrong! Sincerely, Geralt of Rivia. GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If the stuff you want Wikipedia to have is along these lines, it's better to leave you blocked. Huon (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request
editGeraltOfRivia2077 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
That's not vandalism. I was testing pages and seeing how Wikipedia works. Did I put anything obscene or rude? I think not. What makes what I did wrong? Please tell me. I created the article about Thronebreaker: The Witcher tales (See my draft: Draft:Thronebreaker) and I'm not doing anything malicious. Please explain to me what isn't allowed on Wikipedia and unblock me. GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you claim those edits weren't vandalism when they clearly were, it would be inappropriate to unblock you. Yamla (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
editGeraltOfRivia2077 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So then I will from now on only add facts and never do tests again. Please unblock me. I can do good things, like the Thronebreaker draft. GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser-verified sockpuppeteer. Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
October 2018
editHello, GeraltOfRivia2077, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Yennefer2077 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)