Gertiu32
Gertiu32, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Gertiu32! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
Categories
editPlease do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content, 2) the individual identifies as such, and 3) it is a defining characteristic of the individual . Please see WP:BLPCAT, WP:EGRS, and WP:CATDEF for additional information.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
El Al
editPlease keep in mind Arabic is one of Israel's two official languages. While El Al is now a private carrier it was previously a government carrier, and due to this reason and El Al's flag carrier status the Arabic name of El Al should be included in the article. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
BTW about Morocco despite the fact French has no official status, it is de facto important in Moroccan society as documented by French language in Morocco, so I have restored it. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Categorisation
editJust to clarify, people stay in a country category even if they later gain a different nationality. Cheers, Number 57 19:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Yehezkel Chazom, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure I understand this edit. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- it's the transliteration of the hebrew name. Gertiu32 (talk) 11:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- What does "– lit." mean? I've never seen it used on Wikipedia. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 03:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Gertiu32. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please read MOS:FORLANG. There is no justification for adding Hebrew to the opening sentence. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 19:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
June 2018
editHello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 14:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
editPlease carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Note that removing the Arabic version of important people in Islam, eg Eve and Adam, will be considered a violation
editPlease don't do this again. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- As apparently were your edits at Orion Ben and Turks in Israel. Doug Weller talk 12:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Gertiu32. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)