Getdpg

Welcome!

Hello, Getdpg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as How to create new page in wiki, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SFK2 (talk) 04:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of How to create new page in wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on How to create new page in wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. SFK2 (talk) 04:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ZeeQ -India's first edutainment channel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ZeeQ -India's first edutainment channel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. SFK2 (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of StayfreeIndia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on StayfreeIndia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Promotional editing

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that a belief that what you are promoting is a good cause does not make promotion acceptable. Also, can you say what connection you have to the person who has edited using the user names Stayfreeforwoman, Lbiindia, and Lbiindia2? JamesBWatson (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Reply to your request for help

I have read your request for help on my talk page. Although I normally prefer to answer a message on the page where it was posted, on this occasion it seems to me that it will be more helpful if the information I give you is on your talk page for future reference, so I am copying your message to here, and replying here. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Please note that we are from digital agency and Stayfree India given us instruction to create the page for the stayfreewomenforindia and it is not for the promotion of the product but it is for the good cause of the women in India . I really don't know who on the Stayfree page in the wiki , the wiki user is promotion. We can send you the content for the approval . It is genuine and original content for the periods , how to cure on those days . We would like to make awareness to women to use sanitary pads because it is very safe for the health.

Please let us know how we can add the content for women care in wiki . If you need we can use the J&J official id for this page . Hope to get the positive answer from your end — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getdpg (talk • contribs) 16:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Clearly you are acting in good faith, attempting to serve a useful purpose in informing people of information that stands to benefit their health. Unfortunately, however, this is an example of exactly the kind of thing which Wikipedia does not do, and it conflicts with several of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You are clearly intending to use Wikipedia to host a page about a product to publicise it. Whether the motivation behind doing this is to increase profits of the company making that product or "for the good cause of the women in India" is irrelevant: Wikipedia is not for use to promote anything for any purpose. To put the same thing another way, the policy that Wikipedia is not for promotion applies just as much to promotion of good causes as it does to promotion of business interests. Trying to increase awareness of health issues in a population where there is widespread ignorance of those issues is no doubt a worthwhile thing to do, but it is not one of the things that Wikipedia does.

You should also be aware that editing on behalf of a business or organisation to write about a subject in which that business or organisation has a direct interest is brings you into conflict with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and if you are writing on behalf of someone else in order to publicise a subject they are involved with, it is likely that you will find it difficult or impossible to write from such a neutral point of view. (In fact, in this case it is clear that you do not even wish to write from a neutral point of view, since your declared aim is to portray the campaign as a good thing.)

"Stayfree India" has used several Wikipedia accounts, which have been blocked from editing, because their only purpose was using Wikipedia to promote their cause. They have evidently approached you to edit on their behalf, to continue the attempt to promote their cause. Under Wikipedia's policy on abuse of multiple accounts, if any account is used to make edits on behalf of a blocked editor, thereby helping the blocked editor to evade the block, the account used for such purposes can be blocked too, as it is being used to circumvent Wikipedia's policies. As I said at the beginning of this message, I have no doubt that you are acting in good faith, and that is why I have taken the time and trouble to explain to you what the issues are, rather than simply blocking your account. You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia on other topics, where you do not have a conflict of interest, would not be helping to evade blocks on other accounts, and would not be promoting a cause. However, continuing to edit in ways which conflicts with Wikipedia's policies in those respects will not be acceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello I see that JamesBWatson has already given you an answer. My suggestion is not to attempt promotion. Neutral information can be added to some other pages such as Stayfree or sanitary pad. Some of your content is relevant to those pages, but content must not be trying to promote anything. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BigDwiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Stayfree, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BigDwiki (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stayfree may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• company and the sixth largest consumer health company. In addition to Stayfree, makes [[Carefree (feminine hygiene) paintliners , [[tampons]] .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

ZeeQ

Hello Getdpg,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, ZeeQ, may be copied from http://pta.zeeq.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18&tmpl=component. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 06:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

It has been explained to you that your editing is unacceptable because it is promotional. This issue has been mentioned by several editors, on this page, on other talk pages, and at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. However, you continue to add promotional content to articles, the latest example being the creation of the article ZeeQ. You have already been told that continuing to add promotional content would be likely to lead to your being unblocked, and since, despite extensive explanations of Wikipedia's policy, you continue to use Wikipedia for promotion, this account has now been blocked indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this message, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (Perhaps it is worth mentioning that it has long been clear that you have been editing on behalf of one or more other editors whose accounts have been blocked, to help them evade the effects of those blocks. Editing to help another editor evade Wikipedia policy in this way, known as meatpuppetry, is itself sufficient grounds for an immediate block, but rather than block you immediately I tried to explain the situation concerning promotional editing, to give you as much chance as I could to edit within Wikipedia's policies, but unfortunately that has been to no avail. I have also written a reply to your latest message on my talk page, in which I have tried to clarify the issues that you have asked about.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Please note that you didn't read my content but without reading and verifying the content you blocked my account . It is highly unacceptable way of handling the position. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getdpg (talk • contribs) 13:11, 18 November 2013

What on earth are you talking about? What "content" do you think I didn't read? I read everything you have ever posted to Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

can you enable my account ..It is more than 10 yrs you blocked my account . Getdpg (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)