GoSentWin
March 2009
editWelcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kimmie Weeks has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. LittleMountain5 review! 15:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Please...no self-advertisements wp:NOT. Keep to a wp:Neutral point of view. Be sure to cite wp:reliable sources. I edited the article heavily.
PLEASE DO NOT restore the advertisements... this part is a formal warning. Such use of Wikipedia is wp:SPAM.sinneed (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I am marking the article for deletion unless some notability is established.sinneed (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ashlie Michelle Cebak has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): (?<![^\s:])[^\s\]\[\{\}\\\|^\/`<>@:]+@\w+(?!\.htm)(?:\.\w+){1,3} (links: signings08@live.com). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Ashlie Michelle Cebak. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Ashlie Michelle Cebak do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): (?<![^\s:])[^\s\]\[\{\}\\\|^\/`<>@:]+@\w+(?!\.htm)(?:\.\w+){1,3} (links: signings08@live.com). It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Ashlie Michelle Cebak. Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ashlie Michelle Cebak, you will be blocked from editing. "I am Ashlies rep, I am sick and tired of people deleting this, she doesnt have much out there and im trying to make her a little more well known." It doesn't matter at all who you are. wp:NOT would be good for you to read. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise. If you continue to use it for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. sinneed (talk) 19:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ashlie Michelle Cebak. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You clearly have a wp:conflict of interest in this article. You are not following Wikipedia practices, and you have stated at my talk page that you have no sources. You have stated the article's purpose is to advertise the person. I have flagged the article for deletion. sinneed (talk) 19:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Ashlie Michelle Cebak, you will be blocked from editing. Verbal chat 20:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ashlie Michelle Cebak, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Jarry1250 (t, c) 20:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Unwanted article
editHi, it seems that you might be the representative the subject of one of our articles and are displeased with some of the contents. See Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) for a general overview of ways to get problems fixed (as well as an email address). You can also mention specific problems on Talk:Ashlie Michelle Cebak after your block expires if you want specific mistakes corrected.
The email address is info-en-q@wikimedia.org. The first thing you might be asked to do is to privately establish your identity and authorization to represent the subject. Toddst1 (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)