Gofootyhawks

Welcome!

Hello, Gofootyhawks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nicholas Winmar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ikh007 (talk) 10:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicholas Winmar

The article Nicholas Winmar has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ikh007 (talk) 10:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Please reference your articles

Hi there, thanks for creating AFL player articles, but one of the main policies on wikipedia is that all articles, especially biographies of living people, must have references to reliable sources. The easiest way to do this for the new pages is to just to use a news article from when they were drafted, and then one or two from when they made their debut. Have a look at how I edited the Nicholas Winmar, Cameron Richardson (Australian footballer) and some other similar articles. You can even cut and paste those articles and just change the names/dates/clubs etc to make writing articles much easier. Also, please ensure you don't do any edits like you did to Jeremy Laidler - that is vandalism and can get you blocked if it happens again. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 15:20, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to re-inforce this, you need verfiable citations. Also, I'm getting a feeling of lacking NPOV. BTech United (talk) 02:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Shared computer?

If you click on the "my contributions" link at the top of the page, you can see a list of all of your edits - including quite a few mindless vandalism edits. Could anyone else (a brother?) be using your account? If you do use a shared computer, make sure that you log out each time you leave it, or else this may occur again - and "It got hacked" isn't an acceptable excuse here - you have to ensure no-one else uses your account. The-Pope (talk) 07:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Ill tell you

I have been letting my brother use my account. I saw yesterday that my account was blocked for 48 hours. My brother would have done this. He vandalises things at school all the time. I will not let him EVER use my account again. I saw that the reason was vandalism. I will block him from entering the site Wikipedia. Please leave a message on my talk page if there if any more vandalism from my brother.

Speedy deletion nomination of Blake Bray

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blake Bray, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Porturology (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blake Bray

The article Blake Bray has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 01:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

What?

Why in the world have I been banned?. I have done nothing wrong. It says that I have been banned because of vandalism. I previously let my brother use my account but I stopped letting him because he was vandalising and he was blocked for two days. I dont know how my brother got back onto my account. Bongwarrior, please unblock me because I have done nothing wrong and it is my brother. He keeps vandalising several computer websites with Mozilla Firebug and I keep warning him that he could get into big trouble for vandalism but he just keeps vandalising.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gofootyhawks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here please unblock me because it is my brother, not me. I have never vandalised in my life. footy hawkers awsmm 01:45, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:BROTHER and WP:EBUR, maybe even WP:GOTHACKED (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Cameron Pedersen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cameron Pedersen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Greenmaven (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)